Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

I always wondered why many people propose that the first moon landing was a hoax; but I haven't heard of too many questioning the subsequent landings:confused: Think we should remember that in '69 the technology they used was state of the art (don't like that phrase, but it works in shortish post) .... I was around for the landing. Reading about it in the media in the days leading up to the event, it seemed obvious to me that the technology was more than adequate to do the job. No one thought the gear they used was clunky or inadequate. Perhaps we can deny that Irish monks crossed the Atlantic in crude leather boats ... or that the Vikings did it ... or that the Kon Tiki actually did what it did .... or, even Columbus, did it with the crude technology of the late fifteenth century ... getting to the moon, like all the other great exploratory adventures was not only a technological endeavour, but also a human one.

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

It is interesting that after providing real proof that the moon landings were tracked, no one except ossy kid who was rude in his post, has yet replied to it or provided any real evidence of the landing not happening, just web links to you tube abd silly web pages written by the same people.
So what next, Princess Diana killed by fuggin Prince Phillip, or maybe JFK and the Grassy Knoll?

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

Sorry, but the JFK/Grassy knoll thing does bear some scrutiny ;) ;)

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

Ah maybe I should have mentioned 9/11 instead

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

Strange isn't it?

You only have to hear those two words and you know it's in reference to the assassination of J.F.K.

Who uses the word grassy?

Who first described it as a 'grassy knoll'?

I prefer verdant hillock, but perhaps that sounds too much like the name an American Congressman might have.

:D

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

Hey up Garri, you've miss spelt the name, it should be Vernon Pillock.

Retlaw.

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

...and he'd probably be the third, and have III after his name.

They like to keep it in the family.

:D

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

True and then they will try n buy it. :eek:

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

In another thread, a video entitled 'Truth!!! Please wake up', was posted to show Hollywood's involvement in 'cover-ups'.
I have read allegations that Stanley Kubrick was used by NASA to fabricate moon landing footage.

Yesterday I found this which is a really interesting slant on that 'theory'
Jay Weidner

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

I have happened on a documentary - 40 minutes long - which reveals facts that the tv images you saw of the first moon walk were false.
Kissinger, Rumsfeld and Kubrick's widow are all shown testifying to that as fact.

So.....whether the moon landings were real or not, the pictures you saw were false.

http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/dark-side-of-the-moon/

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

Margaret.....

Dark Side of the Moon | Watch Free Documentary Online, is a French mockumentary about the moon landings, it is neither real or meant to be, read the comments about it, have a search on the net or better yet watch the end and the blooper' reel.

man landed on the moon FACT
Next.....

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

You obviously haven't watched it - or how can you explain that Kissinger, Rumsfeld and Kubrick's widow are shown saying that the tv footage of the moon landings was fabricated
In my post I do say that whether or not the landing was real, the tv images you saw weren't

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

PS if you do not have time or patience to watch it all - start at 28 minutes

but the whole film explains WHY

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

Margaret,
I would like to think that I am a pretty sane person, I am logical and will look at anything presented before me with interest. I fly a aircraft capable of hurtling through the atmosphere at over 500 Mph, with 195 souls on board. Man is not designed to fly at more than 5 miles high, but we do. So I consider that I am fairly well balanced.

I did some research on this before watching it, because, yes I had to see if there was any truth to what it and you said.

The film was made by William Karel in 2002, originally called Opération Lune, aired on the French station Arte. There are people in this called Dave Bowman and Jack Torrance, Dave was in 2001 a Space Oydessy and Jack Torrance was in The Shinning, both made by Kubrick. Next we have Eve Kendall and George Kaplan, both names in north by Northwest, played by Eva Marie Saint and Carry Grant.

If you had bothered to even Google this, I know that Goolge is evil and part of the Bilderburg lot but, you would have found out this is a joke.

As for people giving so called evidence on screen, well it can happen you know, Mick Jagger once said the Ruttles were bigger than the Stones. they did it because they were paid to and it is obviously a joke. I have watched it all of it not just a edited copy, it is all over Youtube, maybe you should try there.

You come on here and tell us all what to believe and where to read about the 'truth' on the net, but when we clearly debunk the rubbish we get regarding conspiracy, you conveniently ignore anything that does not fit into your little world, one that says the governments are out to get us all and anything major historic that happened never did. God and to think you call us Sheeple... its hilarious.

Not that long ago we were being warned of a worldwide financial meltdown involving Ameros by Christmas 2009....remember?

Re: Men (or Women) on Mars
 

I have now read
Dark Side of the Moon (documentary) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

but it just goes to show how devious governments can and do play mind tricks, even to the extent of producing mockumentaries which reveal facts as jokes.

The oft used phrase ' in plain sight' comes to mind.