Originally Posted by Less (Post 779556)

Yes, he may have a hissy fit, perhaps because his user name doesn't have a capital 'G'!
:D

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779558)

Don't pick on the little lamb.

He's only just taken his 'victim' hat and mittens off.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779553)

...and besides, as you once foolishly tried to recruit a close relative of mine into joining a pyramid selling scheme, promising riches beyond one's wildest dreams, your ability to judge the true facts of a situation, I don't hold very much store by.

Unless of course you're posting on Accy Web from a mansion on a private island somewhere.

Then l may have to reconsider your gullibilty, and not hold your opinion in such low esteem.

Originally Posted by turkishdelight (Post 779560)

In my opinion this is stooping so low.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779448)

I think you should publish it now that the sender has given you permission. I'd like to know what it says that got you so excited. :D

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779454)

As a moderator on Accrington Web, do you really think you should be using your position to encourage other members to break clear forum rules?

Rules which seem fairly transparent, and make no mention of it being fine to publish, even with consent.

12: All posts on the forum to be made in English. If you wish to communicate in a foreign language, please do so on the PM system,also PM=PRIVATE MESSAGE and all pm's are just that Private and must not be posted on the forum no matter how old they are or who they are from.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...mer-29681.html

I'm sure you'd love my right to a democratic voice on here to be silenced, but I have no intention of aquiring a ban. So that isn't going to happen.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779483)

Garinda, that rule is in place to stop private conversations in PM from being spread from there, as one member may have sent a private message under the impression that it is indeed, private. As the sender has given his consent to that particular message being posted, there is no problem. As a moderator I can tell you now, you wont be banned.

Cashman, I haven't seen the PM. I've no idea if garinda sent it to others on request, but I didn't request it.

Originally Posted by turkishdelight (Post 779560)

This has no relevance in this forum. My ability to judge the facts worked very well for me at that time. Your entitled to your opinion of me. However your so wrong.I wonder why you always try to make it personal, what do you get from it. I would try never to offend or have a dig at you personally.
In my opinion this is stooping so low.

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 779563)

After numerous tellings off from mick ... i have been under the impression that pm's are private .. and not allowed on accyweb .. even if the sender gives his permission .. seeing as ive done that in the past and got a telling off about it as well.

Originally Posted by Less (Post 779562)

I quite agree, but it begs the question...

garinda, how low can you get?
:cool:

Originally Posted by turkishdelight (Post 779560)

This has no relevance in this forum. My ability to judge the facts worked very well for me at that time. Your entitled to your opinion of me. However your so wrong.I wonder why you always try to make it personal, what do you get from it. I would try never to offend or have a dig at you personally.
In my opinion this is stooping so low.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779557)

No they don't.

Rules are rules.

Such a flippant disregard for them is very telling.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779573)

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...-18823-36.html

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post777690

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774125

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774082

Need I go on? Stop being petty. It's not a 'flippant disregard'. All that is happening here is pettiness from you, using the rules when it suits you. Turkishdelight has called you by your name several times before, and you haven't batted an eyelid. It's just handy for you to use it now. As I say, report it if you feel you have a legitimate case. That is where rule breaks should be addressed.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779575)

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.





Back on track...
I bet Graham Jones, plus all the other candidates, if they have any sense, are out canvassing right at this very minute.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779575)

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.