Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779557)

No they don't.

Rules are rules.

Such a flippant disregard for them is very telling.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779573)

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...-18823-36.html

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post777690

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774125

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774082

Need I go on? Stop being petty. It's not a 'flippant disregard'. All that is happening here is pettiness from you, using the rules when it suits you. Turkishdelight has called you by your name several times before, and you haven't batted an eyelid. It's just handy for you to use it now. As I say, report it if you feel you have a legitimate case. That is where rule breaks should be addressed.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779575)

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.





Back on track...
I bet Graham Jones, plus all the other candidates, if they have any sense, are out canvassing right at this very minute.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779575)

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 779577)

By the way shouldnt this thread actually be closed now .. as its title is Potential Labour Candidate .. and as everyone knows Hyndburn & Haslingden Labour Party has decided on their candidate ..

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 779563)

After numerous tellings off from mick ... i have been under the impression that pm's are private .. and not allowed on accyweb .. even if the sender gives his permission .. seeing as ive done that in the past and got a telling off about it as well.

Originally Posted by turkishdelight (Post 779543)

Cashman Just been out for dinner with A.B. He had no idea what was in it, he was laughing about what had happened and i thought Jaysay may have named the conservative candidate, in the message, the reason why Gary was so exited. Andrew informed me that he did not know, what the message was about, because he had never received it.Turned out not to be as exiting ,as i thought,after reading it.

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 779579)

If they are they need their heads looking at .. as a someone who goes canvassing at regular intervals .. if you knock on anyones door after 7.30pm they normally give you what for!!!! :D:D:D

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 779593)

Then i am sorry but he's telling ya porkies, summat i do not! he did know n i know that fer fact, he pmd jaysay about it this morning n jaysay told him, i got that straight from the horses mouth, cos i was around to see him just after dinner.:rolleyes: so all that glitters is not gold, sorry to shatter yer illusion.:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 779593)

Then i am sorry but he's telling ya porkies, summat i do not! he did know n i know that fer fact, he pmd jaysay about it this morning n jaysay told him, i got that straight from the horses mouth, cos i was around to see him just after dinner.:rolleyes: so all that glitters is not gold, sorry to shatter yer illusion.:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779588)

Have asked Mick. You're right. Roy made the rule. I don't agree with it (but will enforce it from now on) 'cause I don't see the point in not allowing it if it's consenting 'cause I guess Jaysay could just rewrite the same thing out. Anyway I was wrong but garinda isn't going to get punished for my mistake. :D

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779599)

I think my mum misunderstood what I told her. :D )

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779599)

I think my mum misunderstood what I told her. :D I told her I hadn't seen the message from Jaysay and made a point that it was amusing garinda thought it was real, as if it was real, Jaysay would have sent me a second copy with a 'crap I sent this to Garinda again', but I never recieved such a message. She must have thought that meant I didn't know what was in it.

Only got a message telling me the content was that Tories had not selected yet and not to tell accyweb. :D The one you obviously were told about today by Jaysay. :)

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779605)

I suppose he sent you a pm explaining the previous message he sent me by mistake, in which he said your actions would leave Cllr. Britcliffe in the doo-doo, was also a bluff?

I know what I believe, and sadly it isn't yourself or Jaysay, and as MargaretR said, either way, in a dirty tricks campaign, only one side comes out smelling of a foul stench...and it isn't me.

;)

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779608)

You are well aware the first message was a mistake by Jaysay.

It's laughable that you're still convinced that Jaysay sent the one mentioned in this thread by mistake though. :D Read the message again, why would Jaysay send me that? Engage brain. :rofl38::rofl38:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779608)

Engage brain.

Originally Posted by Less (Post 779620)

That's rich! At which point do you engage brain when voting without the slightest consideration that the Tories could be wrong?
:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779630)

They are wrong on several things in my opinion. :D Have said so on this very site.

Originally Posted by garinda

Strange how rules can be 'bent'

Originally Posted by Less (Post 779633)

Yes, you have, but you also show the potential of voting out of loyalty to a party rather than for what is good for a community, (as have many supporters of the other parties).

Originally Posted by andrewb

http://www.eatunicorns.com/

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779639)

To be honest if the Tories were to dramatically shift to a position where I disagree with a lot of their policies rather than just some.. I wouldn't support/vote for them, even if that meant I had no alternative party to vote for.

I think Jaysay said he will always voet for them out of loyalty somewhere on Accyweb. I don't see myself doing that.. but time will tell I guess.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779599)

I think my mum misunderstood what I told her. :D I told her I hadn't seen the message from Jaysay and made a point that it was amusing garinda thought it was real, as if it was real, Jaysay would have sent me a second copy with a 'crap I sent this to Garinda again', but I never recieved such a message. She must have thought that meant I didn't know what was in it.

Only got a message telling me the content was that Tories had not selected yet and not to tell accyweb. :D The one you obviously were told about today by Jaysay. :)

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 779593)

Then i am sorry but he's telling ya porkies, summat i do not! he did know n i know that fer fact, he pmd jaysay about it this morning n jaysay told him, i got that straight from the horses mouth, cos i was around to see him just after dinner.:rolleyes: so all that glitters is not gold, sorry to shatter yer illusion.:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779599)

I think my mum misunderstood what I told her. :D

Originally Posted by turkishdelight (Post 779663)

I did misunderstand you,

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 779672)

Best double act since Morecambe @ Wise.:rofl38::rofl38::rofl38::rofl38::rofl38:

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 779681)

I'd like to see the Graham Jones and Blobby double act in the same room at the same time. ;)

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 779735)

Why oh Why would I send a PM to Andrewb, telling him something he already knew, that the Tories hadn't selected their candidate yet, if they had he would have been quite aware of the fact as he would have been at the meeting:rolleyes: seems Rindi can give it but can't take it, Quack, Quack:D

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779751)

Trust.

I thought you an honourable man.

If what you say is true, I was wrong, and you're dishonourable and untrustworthy.

Odd really, as those attributes usually make a successful politican.

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 779756)

The fact is that on Sunday you invited me to send another PM to you, which was meant for Andrewb, so I did, never thought you would be daft enough to think it was genuine, I thought you would have seen the funny side, alas its seem not, Oh Hum

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779764)

As stated, I honestly thought you wouldn't be so dishonest, and underhand.

It won't happen again, because I will no longer be able to trust anything you say, or fathom the depths you're capable of sinking to, to make a 'joke'.

Strange your own political career was so woefully unsuccessful, with such fine attributes at your disposal.

Again, as MargaretR said, whatever the truth, there's only one, or two, people who are covered in the stench of this dirty trick...and it isn't me. Mainly because my parents brought me up never to lie, because if you do, besides being morally wrong, people will never trust you again.

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 779765)

Well it did prove how gullible you can be for your own ends

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779769)

As stated, I thought you deep down a honourable man, and I trusted you, past tense.

I can now see why the modern, caring and sharing, hug-a-hoodie Tories at CCHQ, are having such trouble with their supporters at local party level, in some constituencies.

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 779775)

Well you thought it was quite funny when you thought I'd made another gaffe, we even had Margaret setting her alarm clock so not to miss me coming on line yesterday morning, sorry you seem to have had a sense of humor bypass, I hope you have it reversed very soon :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 779777)

I've answered this in the other thread.

Let's move on, as friends.