![]() |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
I apologise for not following site protocol. I must confess I was introduced to the site by a friend who advised me that it was a good place to share and debate my opinions and on this subject which I have a passionate view, I may well of jumped straight in at the deep end. In choosing the clear username Eafield I had considered myself as transparent. I am not a conservative councillor and for the second time my political views have no bearing on my comments. My name is Paul Brown and as I thought was clear I am a letting agent and landlord in Accrington. I am NOT against licensing, I am merely against the current plans. I would love nothing more than the opportunity to voice my thoughts with the powers that be, but as also mentioned when I attempted to speak with Mr Jones he advised me to call back in three weeks. Accyweb seemed an ideal method of raising my comments sooner. As Mr Jones has not responded to any of the points I raise, I also apologise for being drawn into a ridiculous tit for tat, I shall leave it for Mr Jones to review my comments and perhaps he will then take it upon himself to comment further. I thank you for taking the time to look at my web site and raising the issue of profit for landlords, could you not have the decency to also compliment the content relating to safety checks and landlord obligations, along with the need to obtain good quality references for all tenants. Just a few of the items we and our landlords have promoted for many years, unlike many less scrupulous landlords. I am sorry for the use of bad language in my comments, this I shall ensure does not happen again. Your personal onslaught in reference to factual content seems just a little childish to me, as I thought we had already cleared up the typo in my initial text relating to the date being March and not April. Apologies again for causing you such trauma. On this subject and the absence of an apology to Clatonender, I should just point out that a response has been added and I shall consider an apology based on the response to the facts that I still believe to be correct. You state I am inaccurate with my comments, on what basis have “you” qualified this. On a final note, if you have any other comments relating to my views that you would like to air, perhaps we could stick to the relevant points in hand and leave the politics at home. If you are not capable of this then it is not likely you will receive a response from me. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
Regards.... |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
Sticking to the thread's subject, did you send back your questionnaire to our council, and are therefore included in the lowly 11% of the 1,000 landlords that H.B.C. contacted ? |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
As for your choice of username being transparent, that's risible. Someone could decide to call themselves Coutts...we wouldn't necessarily presume them to be a banker. ;) |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
The scheme is not a punishment for anyone who is already doing a good job or a way of extracting money, more a way of bringing an industry into line which has proved itself to be incapable of keeping its own house in order. The poor, defenceless property developers will simply put up the rents to compensate while the tenants will be ensured decent living arrangements. It's long overdue and I'm surprised that your opinion doesn't tally with Cllr Britcliffe, leader of an excellent council. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
On the subject of the questionnaire, I most certainly did respond, I also went in to great detail as to how I felt landlords could interact better with the council and how the scheme would "in my opinion” be best implemented. I did not receive any follow up to the questionnaire. I have also received no other information or correspondence on this subject since then. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
Perhaps as an educated man you could enlighten us all as to why you would choose (past tense) to make reference to Eafield & Maple in your previous threads, if as you claim in this your latest thread, my choice of username is risible and not transparent. I suggest all comments you have sir are unconstructive and risible. I shall now be leaving your playground as I refuse to play with bullies who clearly have more spare time on their hands than I. Have a nice life. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
now who's childish, spit yer dummy out have ya?:D
|
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
We only know what people decide to tell us. You informed us earlier in the thread that you were a landlord, nothing else. As pointed out, someone could decide on the username Coutts or Hoare, without us necessarily knowing they're a silly little banker. As for being bullied, it wasn't me who broke forum rules by using bad language, and caused extra work for our moderators. Thank you for your input. Goodbye. :wave: |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
If anyone has a right to clain the thread as their's, I suspect it's her. :rolleyes: |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com