![]() |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If some people took the time to read the relevant threads on this forum, or inform themselves about what's been recently printed in the local press, perhaps they wouldn't continue to add misinformation to a vile smear campaign. As first impressions go this has to be in the all time top three worst Accy Web introductions, and the others only pipped the top two places because they included death threats and/or threats of violence. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
Are you going to flounce off in another huff, accusing people of 'pickin' on you', and 'twisting your words'? If you don't wish any part of your posts not to be quoted, the only way around this is not to post the things that might be deemed worthy of highlighting. ;) :rofl38::rofl38::rofl38::rofl38: |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
You wouldn't happen to know Eafield personally, would you? |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
No I do not know Eafield personally. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
You and I are definitely on different sides of the fence on this matter. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
I should also add that coming onto a message board and throwing around baseless (and potentially libellous) accusations towards a councillor in a lengthy first post which is riddled with spelling errors that miraculously disappear from more pithy replies further into the thread is likely to arouse suspicion and get people's backs up.
The whole purpose of Eafield's contribution appears to have been politically-motivated, whether intentional or not. |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
|
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
I have jumped in at the deep end with a subject I do indeed feel passionately about. As a discussion forum I would have expected its members to welcome another opinion. I confess I did not look through the introduction for which I apologies, I will introduce myself retrospectively and with an apology. I am disappointed in myself for allowing my points to be diluted by petty procrastination over a miss typed date, a contended point of dates which has yet to be replied to further to my last comment to Claytonender and a question to a councillor about his current level of involvement in the rental market. You say you agree with some of my comments, yet like many others in this forum you seem keen to quibble minor points and have entirely avoided giving an opinion on the real issues raised. I will indeed be far more careful in what I post in future, I did not realise so many could be offended so deeply by things such as the above along with the spelling and grammar of a participant. Had I been introduced on a less relevant point I may well have spent more time looking at other elements of the site, as it is so far, I have limited time and this was the issue I joined to discuss. I will indeed continue to contribute to the site, albeit only where I feel I have a constructive and relevant point. Going to the matter at the head of this thread, “selective licensing”. May I graciously ask, as you have now advised you are a landlord, are you accredited and if so when were you accredited? I am a landlord, I am not accredited, although I applied to be over 12 months ago. Yes i’m an agent also. I do not have issue with being licensed, I do not have issue with paying for it. For the record, I only have two houses that will be affected by the scheme. May I also graciously ask will your property be affected by the scheme? I look forward to hearing back. :confused: |
Re: Selective Licensing of Landlords
Quote:
...and are you going to apologise to Graham Jones too, now you're better informed by what was delivered in evidence in post 140? Not really a wise move, wrongly accusing well respected members of this forum, of things that turn out not to be true. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:46. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com