Accrington Web - Britcliffe

Page 9 of 10

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)

- General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)

- - Britcliffe (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/britcliffe-58480.html)

garinda

13-07-2011 23:28

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918750)

Perhaps you are more acquainted with PB's real motives behind his office than you would have us believe G. Or is it just that you enjoy having a personal pop at folks :confused:

As I said, I'm not at all bothered if you're a true blue tory, or anyone else for that matter. I just think it is completely ignorant to tell the electorate at any time that they have to live on a mere £38k. You are aware I take it that the Tory central office weren't enamoured with PBs presence ;)

Than I 'would have you believe'?

When you've been around a little longer you'll realise I post what I actually think, and don't have the time to waste masking hidden agendas.

Apparently he did regret the comment about living on £43,000.00 (not £38k), and realised it was a gross faux pas.

Bad P.R.

garinda

13-07-2011 23:46

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918750)

Or is it just that you enjoy having a personal pop at folks

Nor am I in the habit of doing that.

Unless I've clear evidence to back-up what I'm saying.

Unlike your good self.

Who had 'a pop a the folks' of St. Andrew's ward.

Wrongly labelling us all 'true blue Tories'.

;)

jaysay

14-07-2011 08:46

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918755)

It certainly was a tongue in check remark, which I'm sure everybody makes from time to time, but I did actually inform him that unfortunately when your in the public eye you can't make statements like that tongue in check or not, you cannot unsay something you've said

jaysay

14-07-2011 08:50

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918757)

Saint Andrews ward of old which in the days of the old Ossy UDC was foxhill bank ward which was a safe Labour seat until 1966, the Tories hadn't won it since the war, but along came a gentleman called Kenneth Joseph Hargreaves who changed all that

cashman

14-07-2011 09:22

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918781)

I can accept it may well have been a "Throw Away Remark" but what i find hard to accept is, the fact this guy thought he was competent enough to represent Hyndburn as M.P. when remarks such as that clearly demonstrate he aint the "Brightest Lamp on the Street" thankfully head office seemed to have that fact sussed.:eek:

garinda

14-07-2011 09:57

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 918797)

the fact this guy thought he was competent enough to represent Hyndburn as M.P.

What was more shocking was the support he had from the local Conservative party, who were hoping it'd be third time lucky, if he stood.

:rolleyes::D

cashman

14-07-2011 10:02

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 918803)

What was more shocking was the support he had from the local Conservative party, who were hoping it'd be third time lucky, if he stood.

:rolleyes::D

Perhaps they are easily intimidated? hard to comprehend that there all as stupid?:confused:

garinda

14-07-2011 10:14

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 918804)

Perhaps they are easily intimidated? hard to comprehend that there all as stupid?:confused:

We'll have to wait.

Until Jaysay tells us which it is.

:D

Mikejoed

14-07-2011 13:55

Re: Britcliffe

Hmm there's many a throw away remark revealed the true nature of the person. :)

garinda

14-07-2011 14:07

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918827)

Hmm there's many a throw away remark revealed the true nature of the person. :)

Yes, we've collectively noticed that too.

On the odd occasion that a gobby newcomer, with no evidence to back-up what they're spouting, joins our happy little band, here at Accy Web.

:rolleyes:

Mikejoed

14-07-2011 14:18

Re: Britcliffe

I never make throw away remarks. Like you Garinda I say what I mean and mean what I say. From one gobby to another I'm sure you'll appreciate that and wouldn't have it any other way :D

garinda

14-07-2011 14:30

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918833)

I never make throw away remarks. Like you Garinda I say what I mean and mean what I say. From one gobby to another I'm sure you'll appreciate that and wouldn't have it any other way :D

Don't even try and make some comparison with myself.

I can always produce evidence to illustrate and prove what I post.

Just as I did when I quoted your 'true blue Tories', as being the reason Cllr. Britcliffe is re-elected, which is a totally incorrect, and a ludicrous suggestion.

If there was an analogy to be drawn, I'm Premier League.

You're jumpers for goal posts.

...and you're providing plenty of evidence for me to prove that to be true.

;)

Mikejoed

14-07-2011 14:46

Re: Britcliffe

Speaking about gettings ones facts correct.

On page 5 of this topic you can clearly see that I stated: I don't think we should be too bewildered at PBs relentless hold on his ward if the majority of the constituents are true blue Tories

It's ok, I accept your retraction G :D

Ken Moss

14-07-2011 14:59

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 918564)

Na come on Margaret, who in their right mind would want to steal one of those, unless Red Ken wants a scalp for his trophy room:D

The trophy room at Rishton Towers is a little bare but I'm not sure a plaque estolling the virtuous nature of Peter Britcliffe would cheer up any unregarded corner of my residence so I'll leave it be for now.

The local scrap salvagers may have other ideas.

garinda

14-07-2011 15:02

Re: Britcliffe

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918833)

I never make throw away remarks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918257)

the majority of the constituents are true blue Tories.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikejoed (Post 918750)

Perhaps you are more acquainted with PB's real motives behind his office than you would have us believe G.

Two examples you've provided, in this thread alone.

Where you've posted 'throw away remarks', with no evidence to stop them being just that.

In conclusion, unless you supply evidence, which would make the two quotes not throw away remarks, that means you are woefully mistaken, or in the habit of saying things which aren't true.

All times are GMT. The time now is 14:08.

Page 9 of 10

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page