Re: Common Law
 

Rant of the year, IMHO.

Still, it makes more sense than a Graham Jones twitter.

Re: Common Law
 

Not my area either but I think it's to do with dilution of the value although the Pounds pretty devalued anyway. As BG said what is written on the bank notes basically equates to the Government issuing an I.O.U./credit note 5,10,20,50 pound notes instead of the equivalent in Gold to the bearer (you with your quids) for their I.O.U./Credit note (Monetary notes). Theoretically the amount of Gold should equate to the Quid note/coins issued to the public, so issuing new notes devalues the worth of the held Gold. I think :o

Re: Common Law
 

Not quite, Dave. We ain't been on the gold standard for many years and I doubt if we could ever return to it, not since Gordon Brown flogged off all our precious metal at a bargain basement clearout about 10 years back.

Re: Common Law
 

Aye T, I remember hearing & reading about that & it's quite often mentioned in various threads on here.

Re: Common Law
 

Just think of all the money he saved in security by not having to stop tealeaves stealing it :D

I am always the optimist :rolleyes:

Re: Common Law
 

Yes, I can see what you mean.

Re: Common Law
 

I have followed this thread since the start, yet I have to say I don't have a clue what the original point was or what the solution is.

Or even if we have come to any conclusion, am I being thick ???

Re: Common Law
 

I think It was all about a parking fine but I'm as wise or as thick as you are.:confused::D

Still I don't think we are on our own.:alright::D:D

Re: Common Law
 

Kenny has not expressed himself very well. He has been adversarial and verbose
If you wish to understand what he is going on about there is plenty on youtube.
The Freeman movement originated in Canada with Robert Menard and its main publicist in UK is John Harris

harris freeman on the land - YouTube
freeman on the land robert menard - YouTube

Re: Common Law
 

Since Kenny started on this, I have read into this subject.
Unfortunately, after chatting to a friend who teaches Law, it seems that the Freemans argument holds no water.
The Freemans view seems to be if you do not buy car insurance, road fund license or even hold a Driving license you are not agreeing to the Goverments Contract and therefore cannot be prosecuted because of this.
But by driving on tarmacadamed roads, which are owned by the Government you are agreeing to their contract. So your stuffed.
As I said a long time ago, if you use the things that the Government and Councils provide, bin collection, roads that are tarmacadamed, street lighting etc then you are entering into a contract and liable to play the game.
This reminds me of a quote by a friend of mine, "Some scientists say to God, we don't need you, as we can now make man. So off they go and as they start, God says, Hang on you are using my materials, build your own universe"

Re: Common Law
 

Na Dave I'm the same, who one person can have so much to say then eventually disappear up his own arse is totally incredible to me, definitely think we have a cabinet minister in the making:rolleyes:

Re: Common Law
 

Ya BG its definitely the chicken and the egg situation that's for sure, mind you there's always some smart arse that think they have a monopoly on logical thinking as the thread starter has tried to ram down the throats of anybody daring to disagree or take him to task, no doubt this post will warrant another 20,000 word post telling me I'm wrong and he's right;)

Re: Common Law
 

Me too Jay, let's wait and see

Re: Common Law
 

I wonder if this Kenny joker is the very same 'lifeinthemix' weirdo popping up under yet another guise? His arguments appear to be the same and the structure of his language is very similar. It's him...it's got to be.

Re: Common Law
 

No am 90% certain it aint.;)