Re: Common Law
 

I am getting bored with you now.
I asked a simple question and you made 6 posts just ranting without making any sense.
Does comman law allow me to ban you?

No, but common curtousy says don't use your moderator powers to bully.

Re: Common Law
 

All along I have asked civil questions of you, but you seem hell-bent on insulting me and others on this site.

Re: Common Law
 

He cant put his point across without waffling that much that no one wants to read it and give up.

Re: Common Law
 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I dont know about any "commAn" law!

Look, I dont take kindly to threats, ban? Ooh! you are so powerful I,m quaking in my boots!

All the answers are in my replies but you seem to be above it all.

Next You will be saying Snooker is a Sport!

I just dont understand how one sided you are, you are totally ignorant!

Now I'm definately bored with you, I asked YOU (accywebbers) a civil question "ORIGINALLY"
What did I get in reply ? Questions!
Neil, I can see from your 'replies' that you do not have ANY knowledge of common law and keep banging on about my not answering YOU (must be you I answer to FIRST) because in your little world YOU are the boss here
and if you want to threaten me YOU can because you have the grand title of "moderator"

You havent added ANYTHING to the subject except prove to people that you are typical of the problems people are facing today, Ignorance is NOT a defence,
What I want to know is, WHY HAVE YOU THREATENED TO BAN ME ?

Because I dont know the answers ?

It can only be personal,
I have met people like you throughout my life
You havent a clue of whats going on but you manage to convince people with obviously LIMITED intelligence, Boeing Guy and Michael 1954 being perfect specimens that you are intelligent.
Oh, I dont deny that you can string a sentence together, but, It is totally useless to a man of my intellect.
My original QUESTION was Are people familiar with Common Law ?

YOU have NOT answered my question so are YOU prepared to ban yourself ?
I think Accywebbers need better than this from a conformist like you,
And thats the rub, If you dont like something (because I dont wish to communicate with someone of your ilk) you threaten to ban me!

Well, NEEL, Ban away, but get it right before you do!

You will go into dishonour, dragging this excellent website into it as well,

The law of this land is Common Law NO MATTER WHAT YOU OR YOUR POLITICAL/PERSONAL USELESS OPINIONS ARE!

Ban me? then explain WHY! You have accused me of RANTING,

This is a word very much often used by people with a VERY limited IQ and
it is aimed at insulting someone when YOU do'nt have a clue about the subject,
I will ask YOU NEIL, (now lets just see how you reply to this) a straight forward question that requires a reply that contains "MORE" than an insult, a threat, a ban, or anything straying from the subject, here it is---

Neil, (these are facts) In 1999 Dallas police raided an office in a search for activities linked to CHILD PORNOGRAPHY (PAEDOPHILES)

Now, to cut a long story short, the Dallas police recovered lists of CREDIT CARD transactions, these transactions were for access to child porn websites where even babies were sexually abused and tortured,

There were some 7,500 people from the UK that had been on this this list INCLUDING high profile politicians at the very top of YOUR government,

Now I know who these paedophiles are, but, for fear of people like you threatening to "ban" me I will not put their names on here,
I know who they are AND Tony Blair know exactly who they are,

Do YOU NEIL think its right that the "Peace envoy for the middle east" (Blair) was right in banning EVERY newspaper and TV and RADIO STATION from reporting these facts and these facts alone, citing "national security" ?
Do you NEIL agree with B liar that a "D" NOTICE for 100 years YES 100 years is appropriate on this type of CRIME ?

That is exactly what B liar did, he abused his position of prime minister of this country to slap a 100 year "D" notice to stop the story getting out about his closest buddies and their crimes of CHILD ABUSE!

What "IS" your opinion about this ? I think people would like to know Mr Moderator.
Put it this way, if you NEIL think that B LIAR was right to do this you will use your "POWERS" and ban me, but, IF, you disagree, talk to me about it, it is ALL linked to Common Law, because Common Law would NOT allow this ILLEGAL PROTECTIONISM, as a matter of fact these "politicians" wouldnt be even ALLOWED to stand for ANY office with such a Perverted, Corrupt and Self Serving Criminal record.

I was warned about this website by a few people and just thought I'd ask a civil question, I have NOT received an answer yet, so why not ban everyone else?
I see Michael 1954 and Boeing Guy are still here, why? if your policy requires members to answer EVERY question ?
Please remember Neil, there are members on here that would like to talk about these subjects NO MATTER HOW UNCOMFORTABLE they are,

But then again it depends on people who DO care about there children,
who DO want to know that councillors, mp's and OTHERS who claim to represent us DONT, They DO want to know when Politicians commit GENOCIDE, and before you accuse me of ranting, BLAIR is guilty of a multitude of WAR CRIMES the same as Jack Straw, In his last speech to the house of commons concerning the Iraq "INVASION" (war my arse) Jack Straw (who tried to cover up his brothers criminal behaviour) said,

(read this bit carefully) I vote FOR this action, and I am asking every member to do the same (words to that effect)
But the important point is - he said, Of course there will be innocent women and children killed by us but please vote yes to the "war"

This shows intent, B LIAR and STRAW invaded Iraq went ahead after lying their backsides off and confessing that they were going to kill women and children, it wasnt a "consequence of colatteral damage" it was a WAR CRIME because B LIAR and STRAW knew that what they were going to do was kill women and children (300,000 at the last count)

Hee, B LIAR changed the "citizens arrest" laws so that he and his cronies could escape being prosecuted by The Haigue, You might like this Neil but I dont and I wont,
ALL LINKED TO COMMON LAW

IT JUST WOULD NOT HAPPEN IF PEOPLE GOT A SPINE AND SAID ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
What would YOU do Neil ? Do YOU think we should let these Child Molesters and War Criminals go without accounting for their actions and be brought to book in a Court De Justi ?
Or are you alright Jack and it doesnt affect you or your morals and a sense of whats right or wrong,
Just looking at what you have posted about this subject (Is anybody aware of Common Law)
I dread to think what your reply will be (if you dont ban me)

Please take note Michael 1954 (should be 1984) Accuse me of being insulting, BUT, it was in retaliation to your CRAP that you asked me, Yellow Lines, Yellow Lines, is that your limit ? I used Yellow Lines as an example, just a quick example thats all! and YOU have been banging ON AND ON about YOUR DAMNED STREET. What the hells wrong with you ?

I would say go back to school and learn about the REAL law of this land (not statutes) but they dont teach this, you dont know anything other than what you've been told, you think you do but you dont,

Go to a library and see if you can get a book on the subject, its almost as if the subject is banned.
You said I didnt answer your dumb questions about YOUR street and YOUR Yellow Lines, well I wont, if you cant work it out by now then good luck (youre going to need it)
Well Neil, I havent got an agenda, I am certainly NOT politically minded, and the ONLY thing I can think of is that to threaten to ban me shows which side YOUR bread is buttered on I look forward to your reply (or ban) Either way Neil its up to you, let me state my opinions, or ban me because you are scared of the reality of what is actually going on,

Heres another quick one (yes I do go on)

Money does not exist (wow)
a POUND is a weight of precious metal
Take a £20 note to the bank of England and try to get this 20 pounds of value from them, they cant do that, they cant give you 20 pounds of ANYTHING, all they can give you is another IOU which is another IOU

Oh, you can get things with these IOUs

BUT YOU CANNOT GET ANYTHING ELSE FROM THE BANK EXCEPT IOUs

You can "BUY" food with this money I hear you say, YES you can if you find a shopkeeper stupid enough to take an IOU for goods.

I'm bored now so I will tell you in finishing this very important message,

Dont try to slag me down, It wont work, please talk about the subject mentioned here and look at the BIG picture of whats going on before you insult me further, I wont reply to selfish people like the 1984 guy because I DONT WANT TO AND IT IS MY get it? MY CHOICE. with all respect to the Staff and Members of Accyweb, I wish you a merry christmas and may all your dreams come true! :ptongue:

Re: Common Law
 

Someone's a bit miffed it appears. :rolleyes:

Kenny, calm down fella, getting narked & angry will only make thing worse in he long run, chill a little why not.

My goodness, Post #125 what an absolute rant.
It really didn't have anything that deserved it to be quoted.
Please do not confuse intelligence with the fact that you can string alot of meaningless words together.
Just one little warning, DO NOT insult the members of this site just because they have upset you,

THAT IS MY JOB!

Re: Common Law
 

So now we bring accusations about Teflon Tony, IF true then Kenny I am with you, I'll just get my gun.
But regarding the Money issue, I can see you need some help, unfortunately for me, I studied the monetary system in the UK at college, it has been a long time, but I will try.
Once upon a time, we bartered everything, this was all and good except how do you value two chickens?
So people started with Gold and other precious metals, which were great until you were robbed, so banks were started. They would look after your Gold etc and give you a receipt for it, you could then use this receipt to exchange for goods, some one got the idea to make a book of these and before you knew it we had cheque books. With me so far?
The Government print money, in England anyway we will leave Scotland out of this, they used to have the Gold Standard, this meant that you could take your £10.00 note to the old lady of Threadneedle St and exchange it for £10 value of Gold. Of course we don't have the gold standard now so the value of money is down to trust, I trust the shopkeeper I can spend it and he trusts the bank he can bank it etc, if we lose trust then a economy collapses.
Here ends the beginners guide to the Money in the UK.

Actually, I understand you have a choice whether or not to reply to posts, but if you start a debate, don't answer any questions put to you by others, seem to get all uptight with capital letters and rant a bit when you do come on here, guess who looks stupid?
I am afraid you cannot win this debate as long as you show such contempt for the rest of us.

Re: Common Law
 

Anyway, getting back to the yellow lines in my DAMNED STREET . . .

Re: Common Law
 

You have just proved what I suspected about you.
I did not threaten to ban you, I asked you a question.

Re: Common Law
 

I will debate just about anything with just about anyone but I find myself unable to answer your posts when they are so long, boring and unfriendly. You might get a better response if you keep your posts short and friendly. You can always add more info in a later posts.

Re: Common Law
 

My 10 year old asked me as imple question I could not answer yesterday.

"If the Government have no money why don't they just print some more"

Its not my area of expertise, I just hit machines with hammers and if that does not fix it I get out the laptop and hit it with that.

Re: Common Law
 

I quite like the idea of being the 1984 guy. Could one of the moderators please change my user name to Michael1984. It's got a nice ring to it.

To be absolutely correct you would have to be Michael1948, when Orwell put the book to his publishers they said that 1948 was too close for comfort, better change the title, the rest as they say is history.

Re: Common Law
 

As long as they don't call me MichaelAnimalFarm!