![]() |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
We also held a referendum, on whether Britain should have continued membership of the Common Market, in 1975. I led the No campaign. We won. Happy, carefree, days. If only life was as simple now. :rolleyes: |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
I do agree with what others have said.
Whatever their own thoughts, pupils deserve their teachers to present whatever's being discusssed, in a balanced a way as possible. Everything, not just politics. |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Sometimes there is a fine line between education and indoctrination.
It appears that one objective of education is population conformity and control of behavour. Whether you agree with that depends on what you think of social engineering in general. |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
If teachers can take time of in term time, does that mean that parents can keep their children off in term time?
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
If people paying into private pensions can see them cut(starting with Browns £5 billion) and have to work till well past 65, does that mean the same applies to teachers? Apparently not. I keep hearing the pain should be equally spread, don't let the very rich get away with it( I agree )- but no pain for the public sector workers pensions, just the private sector workers and the very rich. We're broke, we all have to take some pain. No-one should be sacred. |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
As i said before in other threads, the reason the pension deficit is large, is cos of pension funds taking pension holidays fer many years, the reason they did that is cos they said the funds were too large. FACT. a fact i am well aware of, only a blinkered moron can fail to accept that fact.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
all the teacher said was 'the government' how could that be any more balanced? |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
If your son watches the news he hopefully gets balanced, unbiased reporting of the facts with both sides explained. He can then make his own mind up, or at least see there are two sides. Whereas you only appear to accept there is one side- the teachers. |
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
Quote:
|
Re: Give me a child until he is seven-
On a similar-ish subject, regarding bias in education, yesterday I read a report in the Sunday Times, which stated more, and more medical students are refusing to remain in biology lectures in which evolutionism is taught as a given.
Most, though not all, were Muslim students, who would only accept creationist thinking. A small minority were fundamentalist Christians. The report went on to say that this refusal to attend lessons, in which evolutionism is taught, is begining to trickle down into the school system, and school pupils are now leaving lessons when evolutionism is taught. It does get rather complicated, about how much balance there should be, when teaching anything. Should teachers be forced to teach, unobjectively, things they don't think to be true? Have pupils the right to withdraw themselves from the education system, if they don't want to hear what's being taught? |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com