![]() |
HBC at it again
Would any of our councillors who frequent this website kindly explain how much this pointless, inane, 181 person sample from a 40k population survey cost me?
Hyndburn play area smoke ban wins support (From Lancashire Telegraph) And then would they please spend this on something a little more relevant, like for instance, the drinking and drug taking problems, or the return of the benches, or decent roadsweepers, or bolstering the flagging market, or replacing the bone idle binmen with ones who actually ensure the rubbish reaches the dustcart etc...etc...etc... Anyone with half a brain would tell you that smoking around kids is bad, therefore according to this survey 40% of people in Hyndburn are halfwits...the irony here is that 40% is roughly the turnout at local and national elections...go figure |
Re: HBC at it again
'The survey, undertaken by independent consultants...'
Hyndburn play area smoke ban wins support (From Lancashire Telegraph) I wonder just how much they were paid, from the tax payers' purse? What a waste of money. What happened to common sense, and using your own, logical, judgement? The only public consultation H.B.C. should be carrying out is one asking whether residents think the council should be supporting Pakistan, in contentious international conflicts. Though I could save them the time, and money, of carrying out such an exercise. The vast majority don't. I was accosted by three nutters today, off their face on drink and/or drugs. I think tackling Accrington's Maundy Model Village is a much more pressing concern, when it comes to making the borough a safer place to be, for those wandering the streets who aren't high as a kite. After being accosted whilst doing some shopping, I did look for somewhere to sit and recover...but couldn't find anywhere. Yes, retro's in. The eighties are back. Frankie Says Relax, shoulder pads, ra-ra skirts...loony left councils. Derek Hatton help us all. |
Re: HBC at it again
Now if they employed independent consultants to find out what effect Maundy Village was having on the downward spiral of the town centre that would make sense, providing they acted on the findings
|
Re: HBC at it again
I hate non enforceable 'rules' like this will be. I was asked to be part of the survey, I did not take part.
I know who and what is behind it and I personally think they should have stopped as soon as they found out they could not enforce it. Lets spend the money making the kids play areas a nice place to be and not waste it on this. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Like with the bouncy castles, you make the little darlings take their shoes off. So, before you let the little tykes into the play park, make 'em put their smokes & lighters in an amnesty box & they can pick 'em up on their way out. ;) :D
Result ????? |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
:D:confused::D |
Re: HBC at it again
I saw the headline for this as I got to the shop this morning. Needless ( or should that be the Accy Town Centre version needles ) to say my blood pressure was set for the day :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
I've lost all hope of any sanity prevailing in the council chambers these days |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Deep breath. Things Can Only Get Better. So famously sang D:Ream (On). http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__...termage244.gif |
Re: HBC at it again
I sincerely doubt that we have spent money on this, it has been looked at through the Communities O&S committee which doesn't have a budget. We've been lobbied recently by an anti-smoking group and it seems more likely that they have done the research and given us the results as they came to give a presentation at the last Cabinet meeting with supporting figures.
A simple FOI request will tell you what you need to know without any spin. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
I've yet to hear of one. Perhaps you could name them Councillor? I'm sure there's plenty of people who'll avail themselves of their no-fee professional services. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Sort of like posting guess work...or spin. I'll eat my jaunty little hat if this consultancy firm used by the council, received no money from the public purse for their efforts. |
Re: HBC at it again
So the health Nazis are shoving it up the smokers again, okay fine, but they should also have a go at the Lardies (for the sake of equality & all that guff) & make sure no ones shoving burgers, chips or even pop down their grids too. Then of course there's those marvellous parents with the potty mouths, how about making sure expletives & cursing are also taken into account.
After all it is about protecting the poor impressionable kidlets .............. isn't it ? :rolleyes: “I am very keen to see a ban within play parks brought in, as it is just common sense not to XXXXXX in front of children." Her very own words, but just add your personal peeve where the x's are. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
not a smoker anymore but ill be damned if i change my view that these anti smoking campaigners are facists and want everything their own way or no way at all:mad: personally i would rather the council conduct its own surveys and act on them than take some groups word that they conducted a fair and level survey.If its a stupid and pointless matter then dont do a survey and vice versa if it is. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Accy Web without you is like an eighties Lambeth Council, without Linda Bellos. Every court needs a jester, to keep the laughs coming. http://www.gaming-forum.org/images/s...ileyCheeky.gif Even if it is unintentionally. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
There's much less painful chafing if you use a Gregg's sausage roll. ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Then they're old enough to manage a Big Mac and fries. :dummy2: ;):D |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Eat your XXXXXXX Fries or you won't get an ice bun for desert you little XXXXX! Please note, in the interest of animal care, when administering an ice bun avoid the ones with currants in them as these could choke the pigeons when the little darlin' leaves a trail of crumbs behind his pushchair. :( |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
She said: “We included that question to gauge how strongly people felt about smoking, but we have to consider the effects." |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Like I say, try Freedom of Information for a spin-free answer: [email protected] |
Re: HBC at it again
Including loaded questions as a gauge is counter productive.
Since the majority of posts both here, and on the Telegraph website are basically telling council to stop wasting your time on frivolities and, to quote one poster on the telegraph site, 'populist bandwagons', maybe our councillors should actually start work on what most members of the local population really want instead of constantly poking their noses into nationwide issues. So as a Hyndburn resident, I hereby lobby our council to take a look at, and deal with, the local concerns posted in various threads on this website and stop mucking about. (and pigs might fly) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Some poor council employee, taken away from the duties they were employed to do, running round, finding the information that people requested. Perhaps most people would consider that a waste of their taxes, in these harsh economic times, when we are already experiencing cuts in services. Or rather, another waste of money. Along with this recently carried out survey, carried out on behalf of the council, and something the council presumably thinks is a newsorthy idea. Seeing as details were given to the press. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Where would Pakistan be in the Kashmir conflict, without the backing of Hyndburn International Borough Council? |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Better late than never, the surveys were done for free by the local volunteer Green Spaces Forum and 'Friends Of' groups. The results were then incorporated into the Communities and Wellbeing Overview & Scrutiny Committee's report.
It didn't cost HBC a bean. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
I did think about explaining all about it at the time but must have been busy :D |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
I don't usually mention things because there is always someone who wants to ridicule local things and they are usually to idle to do anything better themselves. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
This survey was free, it didn't cost anyone anything at HBC, it was gratis, costless, totally unpaid for. And you find something to moan about. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Personally I think it's funny. Yet another example of just how bad this current lot of councillors are at public relations, especially in regards to the press. 'The survey, undertaken by independent consultants, quizzed 181 local parents...' Hyndburn play area smoke ban wins support (From Lancashire Telegraph) So basically it was Gayle Knight, and the Green candidate woman from that 'ethical' co-op, asking people if they thought that blowing smoke in a kiddie's face, whilst it was strapped in a baby swing, was wrong. Hardly shock findings. More like common sense. Not up there with night vision dog turds, but still amusingly bad, and yet another example of this Labour council's skill at public misinformation. It's like them making a big song and dance about the Portas pilot thing, as if it was already in the bag. When in reality they'd acquired a lottery ticket, and had a miniscule chance of winning a prize. Looks bad, when nothing comes of it. Which also happened with the announcement about Blackburn Road's tarting up, which again came to nothing. Some of these numpties may now be responsible for massive budgets, finances provided by the tax payer, but if their role was a professional job, most of them wouldn't get a reply if they applied for it, nevermind get a first interview. Always more impressive if you can actually play a tune...when blowing your own trumpet. Rather than just making some big din. :rolleyes: |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Something about closing the stable door, only after the horse has bolted. I think it might be better to concentrate on the damage you're doing to yourselves via the press, rather than worrying about us on here. ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
It would be Bad Manners not to. Though to balance things out, I made sure she didn't have anywhere to park her arse, and didn't offer her a seat. Bad Manners -- Ne-Ne Na-Na Na-Na Nu-Nu (Studio, TOTP) - YouTube :D |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
:D |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Did I miss the bit in the paper that said Gayle was involved? I was not aware she had anything to do with it. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Seeing as Cllr. Kenny said the reported 'independent consultants' was actually carried out 'by the local volunteer Green Spaces Forum and 'Friends Of' groups.' I could have said your good self, but you don't make an amusing a picture. Even though you too have your finger in many different pies nowadays. As you are so keen to inform us all. ;) Sponsored sing-athon - The Catherine Tate Show - BBC comedy - YouTube |
Re: HBC at it again
Just because I am involved with a group or chair a meeting does not mean I agree with everything that is discussed in a meeting.
I do not like unenforceable 'rules' that rely on people doing the so called right thing. When some people don't it just annoys others and they then moan about the Council for not enforcing what they think is law. A bit like the no ball games allowed signs and don't park on the grass signs on my street. If the no smoking in play grounds was legally enforceable then I would probably be for it, until it is I am not interested in it which is pretty much what I said in the meeting I chaired. My personal opinion did not mean it was not discussed though. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
What's amusing is that some numpty at the council thought this was another newsworthy item to release to the press. As well as being an International Council, we're now fast becoming known as a loony-left council too, as last seen in the eighties. :rolleyes: |
Re: HBC at it again
:enough:
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
A survey among 180 friends isn't likely to get a result which reflects public opinion.
The fact that they are friends indicates that they agree on most topics. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Rose West gets better press coverage, thanks to whover's responsible for H.B.C.'s P.R. :rolleyes: |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Well it's a start. At least it wasn't the Kashmiri, or International Health Service. :rolleyes: |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Though the term 'left' might upset them. ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Same old keyboard warrior's story: 'I think something therefore the rest of the world must do too.' If there's a silver lining to anything, Garinda will find the cloud. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Di-dums. :dummy2: Dry those tears, you silly little chap. You :Banane14:, and the other little Labour cry-babies :Banane14::Banane14::Banane14:, used to gurgle away quite gleefully, when I was doing exactly what I'm doing now. Other than the then target happened to be those you see as your political opponents. If something is idiotic, I'll say so, Regardless of whichever party is responsible. By the way, you may want to ask someone to check your adult sized Pampers. Every time you pop up on here now, Rindy smells plop-plops. :pain30: (Cue usual retort from the politically blinkered, very un-p.c. when aimed at the disabled, that you should keep your opinions to yourself, unless you're actively involved in whatever's being discussed.) :rolleyes: [Dream on babycakes.] ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Again. I'm just as keen on praise, when it's deserved. Again, regardless of who is responsible. For anyone new, or sadly suffering from insomnia, click on Cllr. Kenny's username, and read through his old posts, before his party took control of the council. Vile, nasty, personal attacks...constantly, against his perceived political enemies. If you're really bored, and haven't already cut your wrists reading Cllr. Kenny's diatribe, read through mine. Scathing sometimes, yes, but also well balanced, covering many, many differing subjects. Plus mine are likely filled with humorous quips, so the odd titter is almost guaranteed. Unlike the monotonous rants of some other, half-blinded members on here. ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
I couldn't possibly comment. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Planet Funk - Chase the sun - YouTube :D |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Talk me through Wendy Dwyer's communist threat to the fabric of 2012 Accrington life......... ...or Pam Barton's Kremlin-backed campaign to turn Hyndburn into a satellite of North Korea...... :( |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
My turn to dredge an old thread up.. :)
Anyone on the council care to comment on why they turned down planning permission to have Whitebirk done up for free yet decide to spend £25k of our money on assessing the viability of creating something similar just over a mile away at the bottom end of Rishton :confused: |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Be specific. Please. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Major development plan for canal bank - Accrington Observer |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Answers to the usual address. |
Re: HBC at it again
Why not try investing some money in the town centre before it disappears for good, rather than chasing some hair brained development along the canal? As leaders of the council Labour are beconming a laughing stock, quite ready to dog the Conservatives when they were in power but doing beggar all to sort the problems of the failing town centre out.
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Peel Holdings - shops, supermarkets, cafe etc... for free and in a much more accessible area that would benefit everyone HBC canalside development - shops, supermarkets, cafe etc... 20k (which will probably only be a starting figure) to draw up a plan for an area that would only benefit a small percentage of people Specific enough? |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
I think we have to remember that is the Borough of Hyndburn and Accrington is no longer the capital of the borough.
I'm all for spending money in the outer reaches of the borough. The millions spent on turning Accrington in to a major refugee centre would be wasted and I'm not convinced it needs anymore money spent on it. Lets spend some money on the far reaches of the borough and see if they can attract what Accrington has got. It would be a dreadful loss to us in town if they all move out but hey ho, it's a price we have to pay :) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
The local press used to be the starting point for many debates on this forum and yet these days no one seems to pick up on anything before commenting. Clare and her team have been working tirelessly to get people in to the town centre by holding endless talks with the owners of the Arndale Centre for better rates. The new bus station is on the way, there will be more car parking spaces by the market, the flags in front of the market is being turned into an open-air market once again and there are modifications coming to the town hall to turn it into a proper venue for weddings and conferences. The canal project was my idea because at the moment most of the old mills are demolished and the sites are vacant. It is pointless waiting until they're built on before thinking about how they should be built on. Common sense really, we either take the reins and get what's best for us or let the developers have it their way for maximum profits. Bungalows, shops, bars, things which there is a need for in the area. It's either that or poxy shoebox houses and flats, which would you choose? I've never said that we're flawless but I venture that we're a damn sight better than our predecessors and I'm pleased to say that I don't get comments about being a laughing stock in Rishton, quite the reverse. We're seen more than previous Councillors used to be, it isn't just one man pulling all the strings and my residents are at least aware of what is going on in the village now. Since May 2011 we have addressed problems in every single ward, not appearing to prioritise just the one the Leader of the Council happens to live in. If you'd rather go back to that then you've got an annual vote. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Just with a bigger dash of sarcasm ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
I've just got off my arse and done some legwork that's all. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Ken wake up n smell the coffee, whilst talking to the Arndale owners about reasonable rates may help a bit, the major problem is getting people back down accy on a regular basis, thats fact! Many have been driven away by St Dorothys begging brigade n are hardly likely to return until that is sorted,in fact was only the other day Drinkers were in the Market Doorway annoying people, This was reported i know fer fact, But the Market Police were away on a coarse,:rolleyes: Approx 1 hr later, the regular police turned up, They didn't even confiscate the booze. Please explain to all us dimwits how stuff like this will attract people, no matter what the rates are?:confused:
|
Re: HBC at it again
You could spend billions in Accrington but if it's not spent ridding the town of wasters then it's pointless. This will never happen because there is a constant denial the problem exists.
Going back to the original resurrection of the thread, is the idea something along along the lines of the Reedley Hallows marina thing at Burnley ? |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Any actual development is probably years off but this should set the framework for what eventually ends up there. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
I thought 'poxy shoebox houses and flats' were called 'low cost housing ' for first time buyers and young couples? And the Labour Party were all in favour of 'low cost housing' and not bungalows (with spare bedrooms) for rich old people. As for shops and bars- do you really need more of them, haven't you enough empty ones available now? It's a long time since I was there but I can't imagine the canal side in Rishton will have much pulling power. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
In terms of shops, a small supermarket wouldn't go down too badly with residents from the research I've been doing and maintenance fees could be bundled in with any rents to ensure that the stretch of waterway was kept clean and tidy. The document is way off being completed yet but I have high hopes that we can make something interesting for future developments that will actually improve the community rather than just sucking resources out of it. |
Re: HBC at it again
As another shop is due to close it appears that the talks with the owners of the Arndale aren't going to well. As for the new bus station, a complete waste of money IMHO, you are taking people away from the market and to an area where more and more shops are closing. You can bet your bottom dollar that more stalls will diappear from the market when the planned bus station emerges.
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
The mind boggles that you think it needs more :confused: |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
No one has ever said that town centre regeneration is easy but we really do need to accentuate the positives if we are to get anywhere. There is plenty still going for Accrington and I've got lots of things I needed without going further afield. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Or would it be better to rest on my laurels and wave the red flag every four years? ;) |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
But if you don't bring life back into the town centre soon you may have won a battle(in Rishton) but you'll have lost the war(in Hyndburn). |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
That is one bloody big hill to climb though at this present time, we just are not getting the money from central government that we need to invest in capital programmes. Hyndburn has had the biggest cuts in grants of the entire country because officially we are spending more as a Council per resident than places down South. Work that one out. |
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
|
Re: HBC at it again
Quote:
Good grief there must be alot of unhealthy people in Rishton, Oh hang on though on a quick count there are at least 5 just on B'burn Rd Accy. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com