Re: someone best mention it
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveinGermany
(Post 1039779)
I suppose the point I'm trying to get across Wynn is that although only British citizens are allowed to vote, there is a large number of migrants who still have ties & connections to their place of origin & whose loyalties may not truly lie in the UK's interest, but they have "British Citizenship".
That being the case, their vote wouldn't necessarily be deemed in the interest of the "host" nation.
|
Maybe it's time to start naming tools. Let's, for example, call a spade a spade. If the experience in GB is anything like ours, we are talking mainly of one group, one that shares certain religious beliefs:rolleyes: Canadians originally from Italy, China, the Carribbean, Portugal, Korea etc., etc., quickly become Canadians ... oh, and Brits fit in too:D They still maintain cultural "ties": Chinese New Year is a big celebration, as is Carabana in TO. When the World Cup is on, or the Euros, the Portuguese support Portugal, Italian Canadians ... well, you get the picture. There are a few groups ... Tamils and some extreme Sikhs whose loyalties are "iffy"; but the muslims ... now that's a whole different thing. Not only do they want their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms, they want their own law; they want respect for customs and beliefs which go against the grain of what it means to be a Canadian ... Their "honour killings" come to mind:rolleyes:, and a profound unwillingness to recognize over half the population as being fully human. And I believe it was Canadians from this group who were involved in the Algeria hostage taking incident.
|