![]() |
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
I'm aware that to an extent this forum is a branch of the Lenin supporters club, I'm just curious who here is prepared to debate, and who wont.
Less - Pro and anti Maggie factions? So far as I can see it was just me and one other guy who were pro, so that's not much of a faction. You are correct that it's not yet a debate, but only because debate is a new concept here. I get that people use the forum more as a collective place to mourn the loss of mother Russia, anything else not being welcome. Guiness - it's not a conservative critique, it's a factual one. I'm all ears as to how it's misguided, factually wrong or misleading. Failing that tell me you think it's right that the govt should pay $1.2m a day for the privilege of keeping people down mines. To do any of that though you'd have to read my post.....therein lies the problem. Cashman - Good luck :enough: Cmonstanley - yes we do import a lot of coal, as we are net importers of energy but overseas coal was cheap and always has been. As is the case with so many industries we could not compete on labour costs, and coal imported and shipped from South America was 15 pounds a ton cheaper bought and landed to a dock than mined. Eric - coal pollution technology has improved a lot, but it remains the most polluting of all fuels. Coal emits almost a third more carbon dioxide per unit of energy than oil, and 70% more than natural gas BBC News - Coal resurgence calls undermine clean energy commitments The real problem with this is that China is solely powered by Coal and a new (non-clean tech) coal power station comes on line each week. Any efforts the west makes to stay clean (Carbon Tax etc) are well intended but pointless. |
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
heavy s**t for 2am on a fri night/sat morn.... .geeeeeese
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
By the way, am I the only one who resents being stereotyped by a right-wing ideologue who can reduce the destruction of a way of life for tens of thousands, into a question of the dollar value of a ton of coal?
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
By the by, heard on the CBC news tonite that the coal mining industry in BC is expanding so quickly that they are hiring miners from China to keep up with the demand for experienced workers.
The coal mining industry in the UK didn't die naturally. Thatcher killed it. |
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
The problem is that consumers in general want cheap, Primark anyone?
In the 70's BL plants and for that matter Ford and Vauxhall had car parks full of Japanese cars, if the workers on the production lines cannot be bothered to buy the stuff the make, why should anyone else. It maybe tat successive governments have lots to blame, but the gold old general public must shoulder their part |
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
Look at the figures quoted in your link... £44 a ton if we mine it £32 a ton if we buy it That £32 has left the country, it is no longer ours, its gone, forever.....some of the £44 however is spent in our shops, on our shores and stays in the country boosting our economy, it also employs people, allows them to put a roof over their heads and put food on their tables. In order to destroy the mines, divide and annihilate whole communities the taxpayer had to stump up £2.5 billion, which according to my maths means that the country could have continued subsidising these mines for another 7 years or so. There was a technological revolution occuring at the time, my guess is that some of that technology would have been used in mining in order to reduce production costs. As Mog posted, another reason it cost £44 for us to mine was down to our mines being the safest in the world, an extra £12 per ton for ensuring human lives are saved don't seem all that much to pay from my taxes. Not even going to add the cost to the taxpayer of unemployment benefit for those who lost jobs when the industry was dismantled The human and financial cost of the destruction of this industry is far greater than the financial cost of retaining it. |
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
It wasn't even the start of a debate, to start a debate you have to put forward your own point of view not someone else's. What a narrow point of view you have, the forum is full of communists just because you don't agree with others having the same rights to 'debate' as you? How do you define debate? Does it go somewhere along the lines of listen to me, I'm going to tell you something and no matter what I say you had better believe me without question. The forum isn't perfect it never will be, but that's because it's members are diverse and put forward diverse points of view, even your two penneth is welcome. :) |
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
i think he is on the wind up:) im popping past hunterston next week ill take a photo.we are importing from south america and greece as there is 2 coal ships anchored off the coast at the moment and they are huge.
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
Did You mean Quote:
|
Re: Keeping Dead Industries Alive....
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com