Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Attack on soldier in woolwich (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/attack-on-soldier-in-woolwich-64276.html)

jaysay 29-05-2013 08:39

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Ya it makes a nice change to here statements like that from any family which are affected, unlike the mother who defended her sons convicted of rape by trying to blame a 14 year old child

kestrelx 30-05-2013 11:44

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
When some goon spray painted "muslim" on a statue of a camel - which is part of a memorial for all the animals that died in the 2nd World War, as a demonstration against this incident and Muslims - it shows that there are some people in this country dumber than animals!:(

DtheP47 30-05-2013 12:13

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx (Post 1061121)
When some goon spray painted "muslim" on a statue of a camel - which is part of a memorial for all the animals that died in the 2nd World War, as a demonstration against this incident and Muslims - it shows that there are some people in this country dumber than animals!:(

Some people are dumber than statues too KX ;)

accyman 30-05-2013 15:29

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
what i dont get is why this islamic extreemist is only been charged with murder and not also charged with terrorism crimes

he caused terror and made no bones about why he did what he did yet its only a murder trial ?

i suppose not charging him with acts of terrorism it keeps teh governments acts of terrorism figures down

unless its only an act of terrorism if a certain number of peopel are killed ?

Less 30-05-2013 15:37

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman (Post 1061159)
what i dont get is why this islamic extreemist is only been charged with murder and not also charged with terrorism crimes

he caused terror and made no bones about why he did what he did yet its only a murder trial ?

i suppose not charging him with acts of terrorism it keeps teh governments acts of terrorism figures down

unless its only an act of terrorism if a certain number of peopel are killed ?

Or, maybe they are going for a conviction they know they can prosecute?

Bring in terrorism and 'uman rights will give Mrs. Blair an open cheque?

Perhaps they are learning after all?

accyman 30-05-2013 16:14

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
good point shes like terrorisms version of an ambulance chaser.

bottom of the barrel lawyers with no self resepect

sounds about right

jaysay 30-05-2013 17:15

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1061161)
Or, maybe they are going for a conviction they know they can prosecute?

Bring in terrorism and 'uman rights will give Mrs. Blair an open cheque?

Perhaps they are learning after all?

Think you've got that spot on Less, any Human Rights complications and the problems arise, if convicted he won't see the light of day again, the only problem there is it will cost millions of pounds to keep him in jail.

cashman 30-05-2013 18:13

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 1061177)
Think you've got that spot on Less, any Human Rights complications and the problems arise, if convicted he won't see the light of day again, the only problem there is it will cost millions of pounds to keep him in jail.

Not if they place him in the normal jail population.;) But they won't, they will protect this piece of crap.:(

MargaretR 20-06-2013 15:17

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GEaston (Post 1060704)
In fairness though Margaret it wouldn't surprise me if you had an aversion to unfiltered air, and purified it in your house like the late Mr Jackson..

What goes around comes around;)

It is an ancient celtic belief- the Law of Rebound -whatever you dish out returns threefold.

Singapore haze 2013: Residents told to stay indoors, possibly for WEEKS | Mail Online

Less 20-06-2013 16:01

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1063575)
What goes around comes around;)

It is an ancient celtic belief- the Law of Rebound -whatever you dish out returns threefold.

Singapore haze 2013: Residents told to stay indoors, possibly for WEEKS | Mail Online


???

That is proof of what?

Mad Cow's opinion?

MargaretR 20-06-2013 16:39

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1063579)
???

That is proof of what?

Mad Cow's opinion?

I am not a pagan but did research that 'religion' a while back.

Pagan Morals - Tacoma Paganism | Examiner.com

"Pagan morality is also expressed in the Threefold Law, which states that whatever one does to another person, animal, item, living being of any sort, non-living item of any sort or an action or intense thought will return with triple force to you. Simply, if you do a positive act that you will receive positivity three times greater than your action and should you do a negative action that the negativity will also come back to you three times greater than your original negative action"

When he made a derisory comment about people who filter air - he has got rather a large case of pollution 'rebounded' to him.

Neat don't you think? :D

Less 20-06-2013 17:13

Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
More of your bollox.

MargaretR 20-06-2013 17:18

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 1063590)
More of your bollox.

Watch out - too much negative thinking went into that :D

Less 20-06-2013 17:21

Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1063592)
Watch out - too much negative thinking went into that :D

At least it's thinking and not just putting a ridiculous belief on by rote.

MargaretR 20-06-2013 17:27

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Just be ready to get triple ridicule back.
I just found the Singapore pollution to be amusingly ironic.

Less 20-06-2013 17:34

Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1063595)
Just be ready to get triple ridicule back.
I just found the Singapore pollution to be amusingly ironic.

Triple ridicule?

This is AccyWeb, just posting means more than that, even you should have learnt by now.

gpick24 20-06-2013 18:16

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
So if all the people of Singapore are suffering because of GEaston, Does that mean that the whole of Hyndburn will suffer because of Less`s posts. Won`t that include you , meaning you`ve had more upset because of Less, meaning we will have to suffer again, including you, again meaning..... this could go on forever.

MargaretR 20-06-2013 18:55

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1063609)
So if all the people of Singapore are suffering because of GEaston, Does that mean that the whole of Hyndburn will suffer because of Less`s posts. Won`t that include you , meaning you`ve had more upset because of Less, meaning we will have to suffer again, including you, again meaning..... this could go on forever.

I am not an expert on Pagan Karma but it is likely related to the degree of malice handed out. Less's remarks are mildly offensive most of the time, so there wouldn't be drastic repercussions for him, he will just receive annoyance three times more often than he hands out, allegedly.

As for the Singapore pollution - inexplicably coincidental. I can't believe that the whole population deserved it, unless they have some wholesale animosity to the people of Indonesia where it originates. I don't know about their local politics.

No doubt Mr Easton has offended more than just some folk here so gets his bad karma back big time variety.:D

gpick24 20-06-2013 19:06

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
And while you`re gloating, thousands are suffering, will you get some negative Karma for that?

Restless 20-06-2013 19:11

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
I think rather than had read all that I would've rather open this bottle of red stagg that I got for £15 from asda (great price) negative or positive?

MargaretR 20-06-2013 19:17

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gpick24 (Post 1063619)
And while you`re gloating, thousands are suffering, will you get some negative Karma for that?

I am not gloating - just indifferently observing ;) - neutral emotion gets no return.

gpick24 20-06-2013 19:34

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1063595)
I just found the Singapore pollution to be amusingly ironic.

Sounds a bit like gloating to me.

GEaston 21-06-2013 03:33

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Marge,

I don't offend people anywhere.

Singapore gets polluted by Indonesia once a year every year because the backward ingrates that live in that country just set fire to their land as the easiest way of clearing the weeds.

I could do with your air-purifiers here for sure. Not because I'm a paranoid delusional who things the government is trying to kill me by putting particles in the air but because the air over here right now really does have pollutants in it. Stepping outside is like bonfire night.

jaysay 21-06-2013 07:47

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 1063616)
I am not an expert on Pagan Karma but it is likely related to the degree of malice handed out. Less's remarks are mildly offensive most of the time, so there wouldn't be drastic repercussions for him, he will just receive annoyance three times more often than he hands out, allegedly.

As for the Singapore pollution - inexplicably coincidental. I can't believe that the whole population deserved it, unless they have some wholesale animosity to the people of Indonesia where it originates. I don't know about their local politics.

No doubt Mr Easton has offended more than just some folk here so gets his bad karma back big time variety.:D

That allegedly has a lot to answer for:D

jaysay 21-06-2013 07:50

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GEaston (Post 1063657)
Marge,

I don't offend people anywhere.

Singapore gets polluted by Indonesia once a year every year because the backward ingrates that live in that country just set fire to their land as the easiest way of clearing the weeds.

I could do with your air-purifiers here for sure. Not because I'm a paranoid delusional who things the government is trying to kill me by putting particles in the air but because the air over here right now really does have pollutants in it. Stepping outside is like bonfire night.

They've just highlighted pollution in Singapore this morning on Breakfast TV, it looked pretty horrendous to me :eek:

westendlass 04-07-2013 13:32

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Just read that the funeral for Drummer Lee Rigby will be in Bury on the 12th July. What a sad day, terrible for the poor lads family.

westendlass 09-07-2013 19:05

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
There is a vigil for Lee Rigby at Oswaldtwistle War Memorial on Thursday 11th July at 8 pm. Collection for Help For Heroes.

DaveinGermany 26-02-2014 16:50

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
And at last a proper decision has been made. (since we can't order a death sentence)

Lee Rigby: Woolwich Killers Jailed For Life

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 16:59

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
I hope they are served bacon every day.

westendlass 26-02-2014 17:22

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Apparently, the barrister of one of the evil pigs said that a whole life sentence would be inhuman! Excuse me, but they forfeited the right to be classed as human when they carried out the vicious slaughter of an innocent son, brother, father who was just going about his business on a public street. I hope they rot.

Accyexplorer 26-02-2014 17:49

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
What I'm about to say is not like me as I value life (even if that person has done wrong) But.....In cases like these (were there is No doubt) They should just shoot them and save the taxpayer some money.
More likely they'll be given everything (sky tv,exercise,warm food etc) till they (hopefully) take their own life.

P.S I'm impressed with MP comment,I didn't think you had it in you Margaret.

cashman 26-02-2014 18:00

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Why has one got Life without release n the other got at least 45 yrs? There should be no difference at all between the 2 murdering savages.:mad: The key should be thrown away on both of em. Also those shouting n protesting outside the court, should be arrested, thrown out of country, born here or not,no difference, n sent to a country which is predominately there religion. simple as.

westendlass 26-02-2014 18:04

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1095948)
Why has one got Life without release n the other got at least 45 yrs? There should be no difference at all between the 2 murdering savages.:mad: The key should be thrown away on both of em. Also those shouting n protesting outside the court, should be arrested, thrown out of country, born here or not,no difference, n sent to a country which is predominately there religion. simple as.

I think they said the one that got 45 years has mental health issues. Don't they both?

DaveinGermany 26-02-2014 18:07

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1095948)
Why has one got Life without release n the other got at least 45 yrs? p

Due to him being some kind of retard they've been lenient! I'm with you Cashy, they should both get life & it to mean just that, locked away until they die, but for me, a length of rope would be the preferred option.

westendlass 26-02-2014 18:26

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
It says on the news that they started fighting with the guards in the dock. Would they have done that if the guards were armed? I think not. One bullet in the back of their skulls would have saved the tax payers a fortune.

cashman 26-02-2014 18:31

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
But why should there be no re-course on those outside court that were supporting em?:mad: Too ruddy soft here altogether.

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 19:11

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Accyexplorer (Post 1095944)
What I'm about to say is not like me as I value life (even if that person has done wrong) But.....In cases like these (were there is No doubt) They should just shoot them and save the taxpayer some money.
More likely they'll be given everything (sky tv,exercise,warm food etc) till they (hopefully) take their own life.

P.S I'm impressed with MP comment,I didn't think you had it in you Margaret.

Well, that just shows that you still have a lot to learn about me.
If I had my way they would be strung up.....once they were dead they would be buried among pig entrails.
They are not soldiers, because soldiers are brave. They twisted the islamic religion to justify what they did to another human being. They are criminal cowards.
They should not be allowed to live, but then killing them would make them martyrs....well, unless they were buried in the way I suggested......they would never get into their version of heaven then.

Accyexplorer 26-02-2014 19:58

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095953)
Well, that just shows that you still have a lot to learn about me.
If I had my way they would be strung up.....once they were dead they would be buried among pig entrails.
They are not soldiers, because soldiers are brave. They twisted the islamic religion to justify what they did to another human being. They are criminal cowards.
They should not be allowed to live, but then killing them would make them martyrs....well, unless they were buried in the way I suggested......they would never get into their version of heaven then.

Nice,I agree 100%

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 20:01

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Just my honest opinion.....nothing more.

Boeing Guy 26-02-2014 20:13

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Personally I feel they should be shot, they want to be soilders...

However, one has a whole life tariff and the other will be 67 before he can be considered for parole.

Our justice system allowed these creatures to have a fair and just trial, with a decent defense and then decided to lock them up for a very long time.
Which is why we are better than they are.

I am sure in Belmarsh they will recieve a warm welcome from the prison guards and all the big inmates who are looking for new boyfriends. I hope they will have very very sore bottoms for some time to come.
I have no doubt the regular prisoners will help them see the error of their ways.

westendlass 26-02-2014 20:20

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Didn't the Russians bury the Islamic murderers from that school siege a few years ago upside down, wrapped in pigskin to teach the rest of them a lesson?

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 20:41

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Boeing Guy (Post 1095958)
Personally I feel they should be shot, they want to be soilders...

However, one has a whole life tariff and the other will be 67 before he can be considered for parole.

Our justice system allowed these creatures to have a fair and just trial, with a decent defense and then decided to lock them up for a very long time.
Which is why we are better than they are.

I am sure in Belmarsh they will recieve a warm welcome from the prison guards and all the big inmates who are looking for new boyfriends. I hope they will have very very sore bottoms for some time to come.
I have no doubt the regular prisoners will help them see the error of their ways.

The only problem I have with that is, the cost. They are going to be fed and kept warm at our expense.......something that many pensioners would like to have for themselves.
They will probably be kept in solitary for their own protection.....but I hope those who cook for them can perhaps drop something nasty in their gravy.
They are traitors and should have been treated as such.

cashman 26-02-2014 20:47

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095962)
They are traitors and should have been treated as such.

Am i outa touch or has Capital Punishment fer traitors also been abolished?:confused:

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 20:54

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
I don't think there has been anyone charged with being a traitor...or if there has I cannot recall it......but I am pretty sure that the lily liveried, politically correct, namby pamby liberal apologists, would baulk at capital punishment for any crime regardless of the nature of it.
In this case, how could there have been any miscarriage of justice.....the perps were filmed with blood on their hands, there were enough people who saw their misdeeds.....they should be hanged. Save a couple of prison spaces.

cashman 26-02-2014 21:04

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
I am in total agreement, But the lily livered gits amongst us,dont believe in Capital Punishment.:( Its people like that who are major contributors to the state of play in this country. imho.

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 21:15

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Now Cashy....Up until 1998 the death penalty for treason was mandatory....but clemency could be sought from the sovereign.
In 1998 the penalty for treason was commuted to life imprisonment....so even if you committed high treason you would not pay with your life.

cashman 26-02-2014 21:16

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095969)
Now Cashy....Up until 1998 the death penalty for treason was mandatory....but clemency could be sought from the sovereign.
In 1998 the penalty for treason was commuted to life imprisonment....so even if you committed high treason you would not pay with your life.

Ah ta Margaret, thats why i wasn't aware, was living in Spain back then. Couldn't understand how i'd missed it, now i know.

Margaret Pilkington 26-02-2014 21:18

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
And the last execution for treason in the UK was in 1946(which is why I can't recall it) and the man executed was William Joyce aka Lord Haw haw.

pallyman 26-02-2014 22:21

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
If trey don't get killed inside I hope they go insane knowing they are not getting out, and then take their own lives and save us any further expense.

Retlaw 26-02-2014 22:21

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095965)
I don't think there has been anyone charged with being a traitor...or if there has I cannot recall it......but I am pretty sure that the lily liveried, politically correct, namby pamby liberal apologists, would baulk at capital punishment for any crime regardless of the nature of it.
In this case, how could there have been any miscarriage of justice.....the perps were filmed with blood on their hands, there were enough people who saw their misdeeds.....they should be hanged. Save a couple of prison spaces.

I don't think they will live out their prison sentences, there some hard nuts in prison's, some ex military, or have relatives who are, they will probably see justice is done.

westendlass 26-02-2014 22:34

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Perhaps someone in prison will give them a personal demonstration of how halaal butchery is carried out.

Eric 27-02-2014 00:00

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 1095938)
And at last a proper decision has been made. (since we can't order a death sentence)

Lee Rigby: Woolwich Killers Jailed For Life

Death is too easy ... let them rot in jail for the rest of their lives.

Margaret Pilkington 27-02-2014 07:14

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
I have a much better idea. It appears that both of these men like to fight - and what is more they want to fight to help their muslim 'brothers'.
With this aim in mind, it would be good if they could be parachuted into Afghanistan....but let's not give them parachutes eh?

Accyexplorer 27-02-2014 09:22

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095985)
I have a much better idea. It appears that both of these men like to fight - and what is more they want to fight to help their muslim 'brothers'.
With this aim in mind, it would be good if they could be parachuted into Afghanistan....but let's not give them parachutes eh?

So by "parachuted into Afghanistan" you mean dropped on there "brothers"?

Sounds like a ruddy good plan of action.:)

Margaret Pilkington 27-02-2014 09:42

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
well, dropped somewhere over there...not necessarily on their brothers, but close to them.
Let's see how much fight would be left in them then.

Accyexplorer 27-02-2014 09:57

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington (Post 1095990)
well, dropped somewhere over there...not necessarily on their brothers, but close to them.
Let's see how much fight would be left in them then.

Maybe it'll put more fight in them,don't they believe in a eye for a eye an all that? (Just saying).
There's nothing religious (Islamic) about violence,especially this cold hearted murderous sort.
Perhaps a televised version of your previous solution would be more fitting/disheartening to them? :)

maxthecollie 27-02-2014 10:23

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
[QUOTE=Margaret Pilkington;1095985]I have a much better idea. It appears that both of these men like to fight - and what is more they want to fight to help their muslim 'brothers'.
With this aim in mind, it would be good if they could be parachuted into Afghanistan....but let's not give them parachutes eh?[/QUOTE
Use them as target practice for our lads

cashman 27-02-2014 10:31

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
I would also use as target practice, the piece of crap that defended em, fer pleading as they only killed one, they didn't deserve FULL life sentences.:mad:

westendlass 27-02-2014 10:51

Re: Attack on soldier in woolwich
 
Perhaps they could use these animals for testing on.


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com