Re: william hague
 

If the government forces of Syria do not succeed in overcoming the 'rebel' forces which we (amongst others) are 'assisting', the way will be clear to attack Iran - Syria and Iran are close allies.

So this 'help' for the rebels is a preparation for war to subjugate Iran.
As long as the Syrian army holds out - the start of WW3 will get postponed.

The greed for oil and power is insatiable - sad but true - all populations suffer - war has no winners.

Re: william hague
 

Always remembering who actually took us into these illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, stand forward Anthony Lynton Blair;)

Re: william hague
 

...and the Tories were right behind him!

And from Hague's current determination to get us embroiled in Syria, they've learnt absolutely NOWT!

Re: william hague
 

As a new and no doubt keenly devout member of UKIP would it be possible for you to give us UKIP's opinion on the arming of rebels?

Or are they the same as your old Tory views? Find someone else whom has already done something wrong and blame them when the party you really support shows intent on making a similar mistake.
;)

Re: william hague
 

Yeh thats a much easier thing than actually commenting on another possible war.:rolleyes: or the damage Hague can do to our troops by arming the rebels.:(

Re: william hague
 

not one to defend torys but the torys were sold teh same set of lies we were .It was only later it became clear that blair and bush conspired to fabricate evidence to support going to war

if blair had stood in parliament with no valid reason to go to war i doubt any party would have supported a war

blair is a war criminal and not only has the blood of many iraq civilians on his hands but also the blood of any UK soldier that died in that conflict.

besides torys much prefer attacking their own people they get a much better view

william hague
 

Can't disagree, the lies were used, that doesn't make it a valid argument for the Tories to use it as an excuse to do similar.

Re: william hague
 

Oh its very valid, if yer a U.K.I.P. Tory.:D

Re: william hague
 

most definatley not but if anything it does prove that our government regardless of party is preppeared to use war as a toy to suit their own personal adgenda

Re: william hague
 

They were at the time, because of lies and duplicity and Alistair's spinning. The point is if the Syria isn't controlled all the world we feel the draft, from the backlash, hey but don't let that bother you lads you'll still be able to run the country from accy web, as usual, not one of you has ever taken any steps to do anything useful except moan at everybody else's attempts, just imagine if every body sat at a computer saying this wrong that is wrong whilst sipping a beer and smoking an Havana We will fight them on the websites we will never surrender:rolleyes:

Re: william hague
 

also has anyone else noticed that when a government is worried they may not win the next election wars tend to pop up or threats of inpending doom over war

Re: william hague
 

I don't give a stuff who wins the next election I won't be here, but you keyboard warriors will save the day, too the revolution brothers all for one and one for all

Re: william hague
 

thats the spirit

Re: william hague
 

Some fight at the polling station but don't claim to change from one alliance to another, wasting their brass on something new whilst still supporting the people they have no longer any faith in!

Syria may need to be controlled, but not at the cost of one British life, let's make sure of that.

Re: william hague
 

Pease in our time Less Pease in our time hey;)