Re: Testing the limits.
 

I've missed your input Less,I did wonder how long it would be before you conjured up the strength to post :rolleyes:.

Perhaps you could share your views on this topic?

Re: Re: Testing the limits.
 

Perhaps I could, but it's obvious you wouldn't understand me any more than any other plain speaking person, whilst you are ruining Erics thread where is the point of anyone else putting forward sense you obviously can't comprehend?

Re: Testing the limits.
 

I knew I should of stuck to my guns and not posted again in this thread,fair play I'll keep quite from now on.

Please enlighten us with your opinion on this topic rather than trying to antagonise me so you can report me ;)

Re: Re: Testing the limits.
 

You have had sensible additions to this thread, that I agree with, all of them from people that know far more than you, I would only be repeating what they have said, unlike you, I won't just keep repeating the tune I'm dancing to today.

Re: Testing the limits.
 

I know how difficult that concept is...staying out of a thread.
But it would have been better that you did rather than posting such conspiracy links.
When something of this nature happens there are (and always will be) those who want to pursue conspiracy theories......and while you may not agree with how the Canadian government run the show, you are really in no position to alter anything.......also, until any one of us is in the position of being faced with an act of violence, none of us really know how we would respond....so,it does not behove you to poke fun of the Canadian cabinet.
As for the antagonism between Less and yourself, well, the power is in your hands.
Make sensible posts and do not rise to the bait.

Re: Re: Testing the limits.
 

Antagonism? I don't feel any antagonism towards the simple soul, however you are quite correct the power is in his hands, he posts like a complete banker.

Re: Testing the limits.
 

I like a good conspiracy theory though M,from putting men on the moon to 9/11.Folk will draw their own conclusions from my (conspiracy) links.......

....thanks for the advice, I shoulda listened sooner :)

Re: Testing the limits.
 

Be careful Less, your comments could been seen as "personal attacks" and 'you' know what happens when you make them ;)

I take it your not in the mood for sharing your thoughts on this topic just after stirring the pot?

Re: Testing the limits.
 

Yes, I live in hope that you will one day get the message.....and that isn't a conspiracy theory......the clue is in the word theory......as in not proven.

Re: Testing the limits.
 

See! You still aren't listening. Them flaps of skin on the side of your head are not just to keep your cap from falling over your eyes you know.

Re: Testing the limits.
 

OK Margaret, strike out the bit about the Prime Minister and read it again please.

"during Wednesday's attack MPs sharpened flagpoles to use as spears against the gunman."

Re: Testing the limits.
 

Why? Will it make more sense if I do that?
If I strike out the bit about the Prime Minister all it leaves is the bit in italics which you put in yourself...... A bit of nonsense about what was, a serious event.....and for those involved, fraught with danger.
Maybe it is my funny bone I need to have sharpened?

Re: Testing the limits.
 

Yes
I didn't put the bit about spears in I only italicised it.
You are grasping the wrong end of the stick/flagpole/spear.

I was complimenting the cannucks.

Re: Testing the limits.
 

How do you know I like to wear a cap,have you spotted me out and about? :)

Ok that's me done (for now).

Re: Re: Testing the limits.
 

You seem hurt?
Someone reported you?
You got a slap on the wrist because you were out of order?
You feel bitter?
How is that whoever reported you's fault?
Learn, most of us get reported, some banned, learn from it and please improve.