![]() |
Re: 37p
I must admit i dont think anyone really knew how much per head dinners was until this prog.
|
Re: 37p
prisoners get allowed £1.40 a meal i think it said on jamies website
absolutely disgusting that children get less |
Re: 37p
Bloody heck no wonder there is an up serge in inmates n wondered why they wanna go back gee something tells me priorities are all wrong!!!!
|
Re: 37p
it should be tother way round crims get less than children, crims had a choice but kids dont arrgghh thats infuriating
|
Re: 37p
if you think about it criminals also get a btter shot at a good education as well
how many criminals get free college courses and probably dont have to share their teacher with 40 other pupils like our kids do |
Re: 37p
Because of Jamie Olivers highlighting of the school dinner issue, the Government today announced an extra £220 million to be spread over three years to improve school dinners.
The election approaches- Let them eat cake! Thanks Tony. |
Re: 37p
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: 37p
The 37p is the lowest average cost of producing a meal, most spent more than the 37p.
Like l posted earlier, in a school of a thousand kids this equals £370 per meal which allows better buying power whole sale, especially if they buy in weekly/monthly. Jamie has used a bit of spin, must have picked it up from his mate Tony, but at least it's worked. Luv'erly Jubberly, sorted. |
Re: 37p
The government have offered another £280m towards school meals. Which is over 3 years. Equates to about £3.50 extra per child per year, or less than 10p a week or 2p per day. Big fat hairy deal! And they think it's going to be an vote-grabber for parents!
|
Re: 37p
;) I wish Jamie would come n teach me to cook:D
|
Re: 37p
Like i said weren't having a go on non breakfast folk n no u can force feed a child the ones im on about are neglect of lack of parenting skills when u spot these kids n ask em if they have had breakfast they say no n say they are hungry n are given something to eat as it does effect their concentration n are lethargic due to being hungry.
Quote:
|
Re: 37p
Hehehe he had a go at sandwiches last nite just while we was on the subject yesterday, tho never had the pleasure of those dairylea lunchables his face said it all, but like we discussed yesterday sandwiches can be limiting as to what u can send kids to school with.
|
Re: 37p
Having been a school governor for 20 years, I seem to remember that the 37p is a subsidy on top of what parents pay. However, the total, subsidy and payment, has also to fund free school meals. Since in some schools over half the children are on free meals, it does make it more expensive for the parents who do pay. As always, those who can pay, do pay both ways, through taxes and direct - under LMS (Local Management of Schools) the Head and the governors are responsible for setting the school budget - not easy, because there always seems to be more need than there is money, but the budget for my primary school of around 300 children, the last year I was chair of governors, was as I remember about £650,000!
|
Re: 37p
Yeah Pendy they were sayin something like that last nite that anything extra or over would have to come out of other funds like books, seems a lot of robbing peter to pay paul.
|
Re: 37p
Regardless of what difference this will make to children each day, it will be a vote winner. lt looks like the Government have listened to public opinion through Jamie Oliver, and bowed to pressure. Long term benefits won't be the main concern of this 'gift' to the electorate.
Just heard Jamie Oliver on the radio, he talks a lot of sense. He should go into politics, he'd make more of an impact than other celebrity MP's. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 13:18. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com