Originally Posted by Stanleymad (Post 846681)

True, He sends Don to do it instead:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 846684)

Is it not legally binding when you send a proxy to do your work......



Or is that a Pixie....:D

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 846667)

I would agree that not many would really cares what the other side may want to say; but that doesn’t mean that they shouldn’t have the opportunity to be heard. If they do block the share issue they would have to justify it, if not to us, then certainly the board. Can’t see why anyone, even Eric would want to go back to being non-league, there would be no money or kudos in it for anyone.

We could be a season or more away from all this being settled; both sides should at least try and work things through if only to support what the lads are doing on the pitch….Higher league football would bring in sponsors and money (possibly) but only if the club (broad) can be taken seriously by those other than Ilyas parting with their money. Both sides should take something like this as an opportunity to be open and transparent

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 846683)

If the club took the admin route the Administrators would look to achieve the highest price possible to secure the funds needed to satisfy the creditors. Ilyas, I would expect would have all the bases covered; nullifying any benefit to the current ownership. I hope.

Originally Posted by JEFF (Post 846696)

If the club took the admin route we would be docked at least 10 points

Originally Posted by Doug (Post 846697)

I know Jeff, so why would either side let it happen.