Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1240756)

i detest barton but to me its no big deal, both of em are managers,and it was a push not exactly life threatening.

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1240756)

i detest barton but to me its no big deal, both of em are managers,and it was a push not exactly life threatening.

Originally Posted by AccyMad (Post 1240766)

Think it was a bit more than that Cashy, & the fact that eventually he'll be in court for it says as much.

Originally Posted by andyd (Post 1240740)

There should be at least one rule no playing professional football behind closed doors unless you're income is guaranteed by another scource ie:- fantastic TV revenue, government subsidies etc, other than that stay in hibernation untill crowds allowed back 100% not in dribs and drabs has as been suggested.

Originally Posted by AccyMad (Post 1240743)

That's disgraceful, it's gone on long enough & should be dealt with as soon as the courts are open again

Originally Posted by monkey hanger (Post 1240762)

in well over 100 years of football it will not be the first time it has happened. i,ve witnessed more than a push between managers even in amateur football. think a lot is due to bartons baggage he carries around with him. bit of luck he,ll eventually end up at stevenage as he would not be welcome at stanley for me.

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1240778)

Andy - this is where people have to be careful when wording any rule amendment. You neglect to consider compulsory closures where there has been violence and more importantly racism at grounds. This week's events bring that into focus. So please don't just blandly say no football behind closed doors.

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1240780)

It wasn't a push my friend. It was a head butt causing dental damage and done in full view of young ball boys.
Added to this is his criminal record.

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1240782)

was me that said it was a push, going off the report i read, if it was a headbut then i stand corrected, but still dont think the delay is a big deal the other guy it said is managing in scotland also it said?

Originally Posted by andyd (Post 1240781)

Stand corrected it was a comment aimed at the general as I would assume most onlookers agree fiasco painted by the efl on the voting surrounding how to end this season fairly. That last word fairly seems to be the sticking point because to me looking from the outside agree with not all the facts apart from common sense that the efl rather than being in charge have passed the buck back to the clubs who obviously act in their own interests, thus making any voting irrelevant. Cheltenham of league 2 for instance they could be made to play in that divisions play offs stating they can,t afford to. The bigger picture at the expense of repeating myself is next season to me insisting no start without crowds or something else to replace the income. Being forced to play behind closed doors irrelevant of rule books which went out the window I' n March will lead to sadly job losses staff and players and clubs failing let's hope Tuesday's vote if it goes ahead gets the right result end of season.

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1240784)

Stendl needed private dentistry work. Thats a fact because it was my mate who did the dentistry.

Originally Posted by Twenty Eight (Post 1240785)

Well the consensus is that 15 League One clubs will vote to end the season. As only 12 needed .........

Originally Posted by Mr T (Post 1240414)

There has been "talk" of getting external monies, from say Govt but Football PLC ( in the main ) has overspent so there are concerns such move might not look to well with the general public.