New kit looks the dogs whatsits - Page 2

ossyclogger · 19-07-2006, 22:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

what happened to nike ???????????.....back in the BIG time and lose a major sponsor

Nike were never sponsors, dimwit. They just sell overpriced tat.

Doug · 19-07-2006, 22:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

its a football match ffs NOT the church

and besides the younger ones will no doubt know more vulgar language than you care to think

Bollocks Mr Raver, I know it’s a Football match and I swear like hell. I was commenting that a couple of chaps where a little over top considering there was a small group young ones (under 10s) around them. Just a personal opinion and not a slight on Blackburn Rover fan’s even though you have all become fat a***ed and pampered.

BLACKBURN RAVER · 19-07-2006, 22:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by ossyclogger

Nike were never sponsors, dimwit. They just sell overpriced tat.

iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....

BLACKBURN RAVER · 19-07-2006, 22:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug

Bollocks Mr Raver, I know it’s a Football match and I swear like hell. I was commenting that a couple of chaps where a little over top considering there was a small group young ones (under 10s) around them. Just a personal opinion and not a slight on Blackburn Rover fan’s even though you have all become fat a***ed and pampered.

..

...

ossyclogger · 19-07-2006, 22:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....

They were not sponsors, they just made the shirts. The nike tick is on all the shirts they make. it's free advertising for them. PILLOCK. They don't sponsor every team that they make kit for.

KIPAX · 20-07-2006, 01:58

fc:stanley · 20-07-2006, 09:05

Great Kit!

been looking forward to seeing it! by the way kipax is it good material or flimsy like the nike one?

Mik Griff · 20-07-2006, 09:26

Supposed to be better material than the Nike one.

keyco · 20-07-2006, 09:44

have you got a pic of the keeper shirt that looked good aswel

Wynonie Harris · 20-07-2006, 09:47

So can we now have a definite date from the club for when the shirts will go on sale please?

baldy · 20-07-2006, 10:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug

Pitch doesn’t look to bad to be honest, it is dry with quite a lot of sand under the surface but given the weather it isn’t that bad. It would be nice if we could have a players view.

I really enjoy the game and felt that the lads held themselves up quite well against what is a top side even if it is Blackburn.

For me, lots of good solid play and a few good chances although they aren’t showing their classy side yet I think we’re going to see some excellent football this season.

The Blackburn fans behaved far better than the Burnley lot for what I could see with some decent banter for most, just the odd comment I didn’t like and the heavy over the top swearing in front of some young ones was annoying.

The Kit? Fantastic styling, good rich colour which is well balanced by the white. The Stanley Crest look brilliant and the Fraser Eagle logo looks good as well. Buy one. I am.

Im not worrying too much on pre-season friendly wins although iti s nice to win...what happend last year when we didnt do well in pre-season??

Diesel · 20-07-2006, 13:03

They look grand, and apparently better material. Not hard though, two washes and my home top looked a mess, all bubbled. And the blue away top, despite looking fantastic, felt cheap and tacky.

sparkie · 20-07-2006, 13:44

if thats what the home kit looks like I can't wait to see it in the away kit its really very nice indeed

Fatso · 20-07-2006, 14:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....

Nike logos are on every product they sell. As are the logos of every other type of shirt manufacturer on every shirt they sell. It's not sponsorship; it's advertising, promotion and branding.

So... who is the dimwit here...?

(Clue: it's you.)

Outback Ozzy · 20-07-2006, 16:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

iyou allways get one dont you. all i did was ask a simple question

f they wernt sponsors then stanley would not have been allowed to advertise nike on their shisrts.and would therfore have been done for copyright infringment....DIMWIT....think before posting eh ....

1. You got a simple answer and still did not understand it, who's simple then - clue its not the answerers to your questions!

2. methinks YOU should think before posting drivel.

clueless thats what you are