The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread.

[cashman]

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

Care to answer my other two questions or again is that too 'secretive' for the Main Stand grumblers?

not a chance dont know you, so dont trust you. simple as.

[Wynonie Harris]

Originally Posted by cashman

i will if yeh remind me. lol

I will if I remember.

[StanleyJosh]

Originally Posted by cashman

not a chance dont know you, so dont trust you. simple as.

Absolutely pathetic.
All talk....
Point proven.

[VALAIRIAN]

Originally Posted by cashman

i will if yeh remind me. lol

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

I will if I remember.

I will remind you both......... if I remember

[yonmon]

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

No one is taking the pish out of Stanley.
The most ironic thing is, apart from psychologically - is that there was no arguing over whose throw in it was . . . and no arguing over Crewe being offside.

Maybe we don't need assistant ref's after all.....

Now Josh don't go looking for ironic nuances in all this . So far all the posts have been
succinct, accurate , and fascinating, and no one has been sanctioned YET !.
But Psychological irony, a theory with which I am unfamiliar sad to say ! .. But it sounds like an element which could throw this thread awry and will lead it on a different tack altogether if we're not very careful.

What I really wanted to say was, that from my vantage point I noted Team Crewe pointing out on three occasions to that unfortunate gent( who must have done something terribly wrong in his life to find himself chosen to Referee what was left of the game !!)..that perhaps his decisions on throw-ins were inaccurate !.

Just thought I'd mention it !.

[yonmon]

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN

I will remind you both......... if I remember

Me too !!.

[StanleyJosh]

Originally Posted by yonmon

Now Josh don't go looking for ironic nuances in all this . So far all the posts have been
succinct, accurate , and fascinating, and no one has been sanctioned YET !.
But Psychological irony, a theory with which I am unfamiliar sad to say ! .. But it sounds like an element which could throw this thread awry and will lead it on a different tack altogether if we're not very careful.

What I really wanted to say was, that from my vantage point I noted Team Crewe pointing out on three occasions to that unfortunate gent( who must have done something terribly wrong in his life to find himself chosen to Referee what was left of the game !!)..that perhaps his decisions on throw-ins were inaccurate !.

Just thought I'd mention it !.

Your posts and sentiments do make me chuckle Yonmon, thankyou

I have just realised what I was hoping to say wasn't what I wrote! I was more trying to put across a point that apart from it affecting the Stanley players psychologically, I honestly don't think it actually had a great deal of effect on the outcome of the game.

[yonmon]

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

Care to answer my other two questions or again is that too 'secretive' for the Main Stand grumblers?

Now Josh you're at it again !.. this time making sweeping generalisations !.

I do hope that your implication isn't that those, like me, who sit in the Main Stand ( which Cashman doesn't incidentally !). are ' grumblers '. If so i take exception to it !.
Everyone will tell you that they have never heard me call or grumble about any players or Managers who have represented this great club during the 70 years i have been
supporting the Club .

There are I will admit one or two in the Main Stand who purport to be supporters, yet regularly, by their fickle attitudes and comments, make one wonder how deep their loyalty actually is !.
But to say that we are all tarred with this ' grumbler ' brush is most unworthy of you..

[cashman]

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

Absolutely pathetic.
All talk....
Point proven.

Its you thats pathetic,people can judge for themselves.

[StanleyJosh]

Originally Posted by cashman

Its you thats pathetic,people can judge for themselves.

I didn't call you pathetic, however seems as we are going down the personal insult route again - will you please explain that?
on a public forum I have asked you explain your statements.
You refused.
Point proven (again)

[yonmon]

MEMO TO MR.T !.....Am I the only one to feel that this thread is becoming, due to its veering off its originally intended topic, a little bit past its sell-by-date ?.

[StanleyJosh]

it seems that this forum has turned into a cult - with only a select few's opinions being valid and any 'newcomers' views completely rejected.

[cashman]

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

I didn't call you pathetic, however seems as we are going down the personal insult route again - will you please explain that?
on a public forum I have asked you explain your statements.
You refused.
Point proven (again)

the only thing proved is what you are in my eyes.

[yonmon]

Memo to mr.t. !

Qed ?.

[Wynonie Harris]

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

it seems that this forum has turned into a cult - with only a select few's opinions being valid and any 'newcomers' views completely rejected.

Josh, you're free to state your views anytime you want on here.