Is HD Worthwhile?

L

Less

Grand Wizard Of The Inner Clique
Overlooker
I only ask because I removed it from my options when money got scarce and am watching freeview, yet I can still see every blemish, zit and blackhead that I saw whilst paying for the extra service.

Has freeview improved or are the people I'm watching getting grottier?
spotty_yellow_smilie_poster-rc895fc478833464193b7501ebb700756_aizdg_8byvr_216.jpg
 
There is definitely a better picture, but if I had to pay extra for it, I wouldn`t. No extra charge on VM.
 
Less said:
On what?
A better picture on HD?
Or a better picture than there used to be on freeview?





No extra charge on VM? Does that mean for free not only can I see zits but I can see them weeping?
Click to expand...
Sorry, yes HD is better than standard TV, but standard TV is still a good pic and if HD cost extra then i`d just stick with SD. Obviously, that`s just my opinion, I`m sure there`ll be others who will disagree.
 
Yeah for sure. Make sure you get a 1080 TV and when you watch stuff in 1080 there is a world of difference. But then again when is ultra HD coming out ? :)
 
gpick24 said:
Sorry, yes HD is better than standard TV, but standard TV is still a good pic and if HD cost extra then i`d just stick with SD. Obviously, that`s just my opinion, I`m sure there`ll be others who will disagree.
Click to expand...
Most of it is just a sales gimmick, what we have now is far better than the old cathode ray tube, if the picture is enjoyable why bother with a gimmick for a few extra zits. Doesn't make any difference wether its Freeview, FreeSat, or Sky, I can flick across from any of those and can't see any difference in picture, but volume has to be adjusted.
 
Last edited:
Never bothered wi H.D. n am very unlikely to in future, perfectly happy wi picture ive got fer amount of stuff i watch on a very sub standard T.V. service.
 
Retlaw said:
Most of it is just a sales gimmick, what we have now is far better than the old cathode ray tube, if the picture is enjoyable why bother with a gimmick for a few extra zits.
Click to expand...


Got to agree, far better than a CRT, when I had HD it was nice watching new progs showing the facinating folds in a flowers petal or a bees wing, but watching a new 'thriller', where the star has more hairs growing out of the tip of his nose than I have, no thanks.
:D
cashman said:
Never bothered wi H.D. n am very unlikely to in future, perfectly happy wi picture ive got fer amount of stuff i watch on a very sub standard T.V. service.
Click to expand...

I can understand that, absolutely no point in crystal clear T.V. when you can't find your way to the bar on a Saturday in the Railway, to get a round in.
:hidewall:
 
I watch the HD channels on virgin over the sd ones because it does look better but I think you really need a bigger tv than ours to see the difference. This is one area where virgin win over sky because you dont pay extra for hd on virgin. Virgin boxes have 3 tuners but sky only have 2 which is another advantage. Sky has more channels though.
 
Re: Re: Is HD Worthwhile?

gpick24 said:
Won`t really matter for TV, they don`t even broadcast in 1080p yet, just 1080i, so what chance is there of them broadcasting ultra HD?
Click to expand...

True but imo there is no point buying a 720p when there is not a huge difference in price and for things like bluray and such.

Yeah ultraHD. I guess it will be a long time yet :)
 
gpick24 said:
Won`t really matter for TV, they don`t even broadcast in 1080p yet, just 1080i, so what chance is there of them broadcasting ultra HD?
Click to expand...


Point is we are moving away from traditional broadcast technologies... just look at the "smart" Tv's. Internet connected etc brings an alternative mechanism to deliver ultraHD direct and bypass all the horrible technical challenges that OTA broadcast brings.


I personally do think HD is a lot better than SD especially on the size of TVs we have today (and I'm not someone who wants a 50" monster thing in the corner ). People also forget that HD also brings vastly improved sound quality as well as a better picture. So even if you have your eyes shut during last night of the proms it will be a better experience than SD especially if you pipe it through a decent stereo. :D
 
gpick24 said:
Sorry, yes HD is better than standard TV, but standard TV is still a good pic and if HD cost extra then i`d just stick with SD. Obviously, that`s just my opinion, I`m sure there`ll be others who will disagree.
Click to expand...
I'm in agreement...

You can tell HD is a better image if you get up close and personal, but the larger the TV, the further away you need to sit, so it all cancels out eventually. If you really notice the extra details like the nasal hairs, you're not really watching the program for its content...

Entwisi is right about the audio, though. If you like to watch Dr Who with the vocals coming from the TV and the music and ambient sound coming from the rest of the room, then HD is the way to go...
 
All this talk about visible detail provided by differing systems is missing the basic essential - eyesight.

If everything is blurred, HD will be too.
 
MargaretR said:
All this talk about visible detail provided by differing systems is missing the basic essential - eyesight.

If everything is blurred, HD will be too.
Click to expand...

Goodness mags not like you that, can't you find one of your we're all doomed links with, it's modern technology that's forcing us down this path themes?

Could it be that no one has condemned HD TV yet?

Now's your chance to write your own. Go on be the first, you know you want to.
 
I just want to point out that there is no point getting HD if your eyesight is so bad that you don't see the detail anyway.:rolleyes:

I recall getting my first pair of glasses at age 10, and seeing the wrinkles on my gran's face, which I never knew she had.

What you haven't seen, you don't believe exists, until you become aware that everyone has their perception limited to a varying extent.
 
When I first got HD, the biggest improvement I noticed wasn`t from the HD channels but changing from SCART to HDMI/DVI, even on SD channels the improvement was huge.
 
Less said:
I only ask because I removed it from my options when money got scarce and am watching freeview, yet I can still see every blemish, zit and blackhead that I saw whilst paying for the extra service.

Has freeview improved or are the people I'm watching getting grottier?

spotty_yellow_smilie_poster-rc895fc478833464193b7501ebb700756_aizdg_8byvr_216.jpg
Click to expand...
It might help Less if you dusted your TV screen occasionally:D
 
There is a big difference between HD and ordinary TV, especially sports programs, when it first came out my Daughter changed over to a football match one Saturday lunchtime, I told her to change to HD when it changed over she just said hell what a big difference there is between the two channels
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top