I believe, (though am willing to be shot down because I'm working from memory), that Jenkins was a liar and it was later rumored that his ear was removed when he was a pirate, but our Government had been looking for an excuse to go to war, so they did, (nothing new there then).
Please Remember
- Thread starter Less
- Start date
I believe, (though am willing to be shot down because I'm working from memory), that Jenkins was a liar and it was later rumored that his ear was removed when he was a pirate, but our Government had been looking for an excuse to go to war, so they did, (nothing new there then).
I think your's and another's view seems to be 'I can put forward my view without reading what went on before, I won't read their stuff why should I? They should pay attention to anything I say however'.
As for being a know it all as your posts have proved, that is something I would never accuse you of.
i take issue with your suggestion that i dont read previous post, prior to posting i would like you to substantiate that claim, but you won't. because its your cop out, a way of dismissing anything i say
its not all about you less, people on here other than you, thats that complex of yours creeping in again
No, it isn't all about me, I can hardly get a word in because it's all about you (according to you).
if you dont want the dog to bark, dont poke it with a stick!
It was Houseboy who said he hadn't the time to read previous posts of a thread he contributed to.
For sure Michael it was - but they got away with it.
Poke it? I'd have put it on a spit and be serving it at a wood roast barbie by now, if it was a dog worth having.
Right again, Michael.
someone please make me a brew .... cant move ... im too stuffed ... the spugster took me out for tea... made me walk home ...and went to bed ...and i need a brew ....
thanks for the offer of the brews everyone ...
followed by a he-she, thats still there!
They are like Ant and deck difficult to tell apart, one merges into the other, I'm sure he's posted something similar if not I apologise for him not posting that he doesn't read threads but I won't apologise for the way he answers posts within them.
They are like Ant and deck difficult to tell apart, one merges into the other, I'm sure he's posted something similar if not I apologise for him not posting that he doesn't read threads but I won't apologise for the way he answers posts within them.
i can apologise myself for the way i post threads, as i have done in the past, if you would like to draw my attention to any posts that you believe warrant an apology, and i will certainly re read, and if an apology is due, it shall be so!
link doesnt work sorry
How strange, works for me.
Wonder if anyone else has a problem with your posts?
does the link work for anyone else?
How strange, works for me.
Wonder if anyone else has a problem with your posts?
and the question wssnt if they had a problem with my posts, it was if they required an apology
I don't know, I haven't asked them, should I do it in the form of a poll?
Does the link work for you?
Yes.
No.
Don't know.
Don't care I've read this carp before.
Wouldn't read this carp but will insist you pay attention to anything I say.
you see that complex of yours again, oh less,
the question WAS to everyone else, is it just me that the link doesnt work for,
however they are all bored to death now reading both of our posts!
Well I will answer. The link doesn't work for me.