![]() |
Re: Licence's
It is my understanding that the Licence Fee is in fact a licence to operate a radio/TV receiver. The revenue from the licence fee does not go directly to the BBC but to the government who then fund the BBC. That is perhaps why it is legal to watch a programme via your compter as that is not a radio/TV receiver.
Maybe the "Freemen" will have something to whinge about when - if he is not paying his utility and TV charges as he intimates, the various agencies take him to court and he is required to pay, or better still to go on a rather restricted holiday |
Re: Licence's
Rather than running off mid descussion and giving bad karma why not stay and have it out?
You may learn something :rolleyes: |
Re: Licence's
Chris, I have not given you any bad Karma.
As you are on my ignore list, I can only see you and your posts when I am not signed in, this stops me giving you bad Karma. Although some one has given unsigned good Karma, cheers for that As I said I am bored with this conversation it is going nowhere, you see your demands on United Utilities are unreasonable, as they cannot answer almost all of them with 100% accuracy, something you requested. |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
Your right this conversation is going nowhere and it's off topic :rolleyes: |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
|
Re: Licence's
I very much doubt if anyone would be remotely interested in attending a court appearance of yours. So i wouldn't concern meself on that score.:rolleyes:
|
Re: Licence's
Quote:
It could easily be argued that since everyone else was in fact paying their bills, and that no-one had actually had any serious adverse effects from using it, that it was reasonable to suppose that the water was clean, safe and health promoting. You are playing the system, just like the MP's who use the excuse thats its legal to scam their expenses. Eventually you will get your wish to get your day in court and you will come out the worse for it. Say hello to Bubba for me :) |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
I'm pretty sure if i had to i could knock up a legal argument about health issues relating to water :pwink: In my eyes it's war with UU so the gloves are off :D but if your right and i do go court(if i decide to Accept there invite that is) i'll record it and you can watch it on youtube and if i go on a vacation to HMP (which theres no chance of) i'll pass your regards onto Bubba :D |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
Non-attendance at court - warrant issued for arrest As for video recording (which is only allowable at the courts discretion), it's for personal use only, which will be made clear at the hearing. If you put it on youtube, my guess is you'd be up for contempt. If you've declared war, you're gonna need a gun not a peashooter ;) |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
IF you are that concerned about your water supply you should have it tested, Water Testing Ireland -Test your Irish drinking water supply, water supply test kits for Ireland and the UK , Water Test, Drinking Water Testing, cryptospiridiosis test, Water Analysis, Water pollutant testing- Uk & Ireland, Galway water test , Antri Then if still unhappy why not get your own well drilled WB+AD Morgan | Domestic Of course it's easier to carry on not paying bills........ |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
So Mr Freemen prove to Accyweb that you are not paying the bills as you have stated. |
Re: Licence's
Chris what do you do for a living ?
|
Re: Licence's
Quote:
There's a few folk(not just on here) who live in fear of court and what the big bad judge might do if you end up infront of him,They are only interested in cash and how they can line their pockets,their not interested in justice etc. I did'nt say i'd ignore a court invite,I deal with my own affairs,I think dealing with these companys without the need of a third party(court) sticking there noses into my business is the key. Video recording:Have you asked yourself why they don't like you filming in court? If you give consent and they have nothing to hide Why not?(they are filming you soon as you step foot into the god forbidden place,but thats ok i assume) as for contempt thats another fear tactic they use(it would have to be proven to a criminal standard(not much chance of that then) The whole "i find you in comtempt,send him down" is all BS they can't do that because it would make them judge,jury,executioner all rolled into one it would have to be heard separately by a different 'judge' without a conflict of interests ;) If i ever have the misfortune of being before a 'judge' i'll bring my machine gun not the peashooter ;) |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
Like i've said before i'm only not paying water,council tax at the min because of my personal despute with them companys,also i don't need to prove anything to anyone least of all Accyweb ;) |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com