![]() |
Re: Licence's
WTC building 7 repotimg by the BBC debunked here:
Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - World Trade Center 7, Building 7 And Tony Rooke did not win his case, he was fines £200.00. http://www.wscountytimes.co.uk/news/...case-1-4825350 And http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...acts-9-11.html |
Re: Licence's
From your own link - :rolleyes:
"He imposed a six month conditional discharge, with £200 legal costs. Outside court, Rooke said the case had been a ‘score draw’ since the judge had looked at the evidence - albeit in private - and had decided not to fine him. He called for anyone who has evidence which challenges the official version of the 9/11 terrorist attacks to pass it to the authorities. |
Re: Licence's
Your clutching at straws here Maragret.
You started by saying the man had won, no mention of any costs or conditional discharge. This is a non starter and I will not be drawn in, the man lost, he got a Six month conditional discharge. |
Re: Licence's
Quote:
|
Re: Licence's
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Licence's
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 18:24. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com