![]() |
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
Quote:
|
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
What safeguards? Any parliament can remove anything any previous parliament put in place.
|
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
Quote:
|
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
When I posted my last post #42 I had no intention of taking any further part in this thread but your jibe in your post #52 warrants a response garinda.
The last two sentences in my last post #42 Neil and garinda read: Quote:
There is no point in continuing garinda mainly because you asked, “Still waiting for a good example from one of you about how our civil liberties would be infringed?” and when Cyfr offered a reason which you accepted as an honest reason your response was, “In my book not a very valid reason, because you don't want it, but thanks for trying.” So no matter how valid a reason might be put forward you will always come back with a dismissal. You seem to be so entrenched in your own opinion that no one else’s matters, as far as you are concerned. Let me also point out that you want a DNA database and you gave some reasons to back up your choice yet when Cyfr does exactly the same except to say that he doesn’t want a DNA database his opinion is dismissed by you. I wasn’t aware that we had to kow tow to your opinions. Tugs forelock and demonstrates that I can still draw a long bow with either hand. As WillowTheWhisp (I got it right this time) declared, the police are not above planting evidence to secure a conviction and that is a real worry. In this day and age the police are under a lot of pressure to solve crimes and it must be tempting to bend the rules a bit to do so. Having offered my opinion on this topic I see no point in repeating it over and over when I know that it will be met with a dismissal. I repeat again – I agree to disagree but it seems some very self opinionated people do not want to and just want to bang the table. |
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
My rather curt reply to Cyfr's inital reason, that he didn't like it, was followed by an acknowledgment that he did give a valid reason with the cross contamination example. Although I still agree to disagree with him on the benefits a national DNA database would afford us.
(By the way although you are older than me, I don't think you are a suspect for being Jack the Ripper.:D) |
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
Quote:
Though its good that any parliament can remove previous parliaments legislation, because if someone puts in some nutty legislation *cough poll tax* the next parliament can remove it if they wish to. |
Re: DNA Sampling in Schools
Its time we took some back. They wield too much power over us and just because somthing is good for France and Germany dosnt make it good for the UK or Spain. An example being the labour laws from Brussels.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 14:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com