![]() |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
The “When in Rome do as the Romans do” quote, blazey, is made to point out that this is our country and we were here first so any visitors must abide by our laws and not try to enforce their own laws or integrate them into ours.
Look at it this way. If you had a large house and you allowed someone to take up residence in it, how would you feel if they started to try and run your house as they wanted to? Let us just suppose that your house rule was that the TV had to be switched off at midnight but your ‘guests’ insisted on watching at all hours of the night. I would imagine that you would soon show them the door. |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Mani what planet are you living on.I think a good holiday to a muslim country would let you see the bigger picture.I am sure your intentions are good but your very misguided.
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
But I keep on forgetting, some people on this forum are not allowed to have their own opinions if they happen to be different to others. |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
If things our being done the right way in this country then why are our children stabbing each other over their pocket money, our women being raped by our own, our elderly being mugged and left to die in the street, not to mention the homeless people we ignore.
From what I understand of this issue, as a law student, is that the only sharia law that would be enforced IF ACCEPTED BY BOTH PARTIES, is that of which doesn't breach the Human Rights Act. I know you are thinking of the Camel's nose, but really, unless something extremely dramatic occurs any time soon then I doubt we are going to see a change in the law that affects a huge portion of the popularity. Besides, how many of you would like to enforce strict muslim punishment on paedophiles? If that was the suggestion then how many people would ignore the camel's nose and enforce it? How can I be naive when I am one of the few people on this forum who actually dedicates their life to studying the law and society? I have to spend 40 hrs a week studying these legal problems before I take time to come online and discuss them for fun. I might be young and indeed I may even be silly at times, and I've no doubts I'm probably smaller than you. But please don't insult my intelligence with your petty comments. |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
If we don't like it then maybe we should question why we elected such a liberal feckless government in the first place. I already said I don't know enough about sharia law to know whether it really could or couldn't work, but I wouldn't be so quick to say it is a bad thing on the basis that there are countries that use the law to treat people badly and it's different. I've seen lots of our own laws treat people badly enough to know better. |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
An Englishman's home is his castle BUT......beyond the moat --
some flexibility is needed by both existing residents and newcomers. When this balance of concessions appears unequal, the drawbridge goes up and boiling oil gets thrown from the battlements. It would be easier for all of us to be flexible if we adopted the North American native peoples attitude to land ownership, which is- No-one owns any patch of earth at any time - we just borrow the use of the bit we stand on for the short time we are here. As global warming and natural disasters make large parts of this planet uninhabitable, mass population migration will happen. We will need to decide whether to lower or raise the drawbridge. ....and bear in mind that you may be on the wrong side of one |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
Yes our histroy is disgusting, we don't want our future to be as well. |
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
Quote:
|
Re: Sharia Law Rules OK!
My point regarding the theory of evolution is that things which were once taught as fact when I was at school have since been disproven. I was taught that homo sapiens evolved from neanderthal man. Then evidence was found of neanderthal and homo sapiens co-existing. The 'earliest known ancestor' keeps getting knocked off the perch too in favour of a new discovery of an even earlier one. Evolution is far from being on solid ground. There are far too many missing links, not just the mythological 'one'.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com