Originally Posted by kestrelx (Post 975321)

Most of the ground breaking popular music wouldn't have happened but for the influence of drugs.

Originally Posted by Michael1954 (Post 975326)

Is that what this is really all about: you?

Originally Posted by kestrelx (Post 975331)

The Beatles were on uppers (Amphetamines) in Hamburg. Are you saying Sgt. Pepper's is crap? I don't think the Beatles made a "bad" record in the 60's did they? Hendrix as the Jimi Hendrix Experience was all about LSD - not to mention Cream who were into the LSD and Ginger Baker was a heroin addict and Clapton was latter on.

Originally Posted by walkinman221 (Post 975362)

So now ALL the best ground breaking music owes its creation to recreational drugs, it amazes me how any of us function without taking drugs to make us more creative,enlightened, spiritually aware, socially responsible and all round good eggs you nearly have me converted kestrelx keep going:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::roll eyes::rolleyes:

Originally Posted by kestrelx (Post 975327)

No - it's about the Beatles, The Who, Hendrix all who's groundbreaking music was largely influenced by recreational drugs. The question is "without using drugs would these acts have created such groundbreaking music?" And would Rock/Pop music have been what it was.

Originally Posted by Wrighty (Post 975383)

What would you call ground breaking music tho ?

Some of the best musicians & best bands from both sides of the pond have produced some of there best material while intoxicated

Originally Posted by tommiasfc (Post 975349)

So cannabis can lead to cocane and that can lead to heroin?

Is that what you are saying to put it in layman terms

Originally Posted by Less (Post 975374)

There is only one way to prevent him talking to you again, that is to prove yourself to be an Officer & a Gentleman, pick up the metophorical revolver, walk into the study and...

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 975359)

Wooow eee, he don't like it up him captain mainwaring :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 975389)

Yes, it can.

Though of course not in every case.

As I've already said umpteen times, if you take the trouble to read what's already been posted in this thread.

Some 'soft' drug users will stay using those narcotics for a lifetime.

However, all those addicted to 'hard' drugs, started their sorrowful journey by first taking 'soft' drugs.

Take the time to read what's already been said, before asking anymore daft questions, which have already been addressed.

Originally Posted by kestrelx (Post 975345)

YOU ARE SCUM!!! DON'T TALK TO ME AGAIN!!!

Originally Posted by tommiasfc (Post 975398)

So how many of those addicted to hard drugs actualy started off their journey with alcohol then went onto soft drugs.

Why you not saying. Drugs should not be legalised and alcohol should also be made illegal because every drug addict started with alcohol then went on the soft drugs then hard drugs.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 975404)

Read the thread.

I'm not repeating myself again, because you have so little concentration.

Did you always suffer from it, or is it something that's happened recently?

What do you think triggered it?

Originally Posted by tommiasfc (Post 975349)

So cannabis can lead to cocane and that can lead to heroin?

Is that what you are saying to put it in layman terms

Originally Posted by tommiasfc (Post 975406)

I have asked you questions before but if they are to difficult you choose to ignore them there are over 60 pages it would take me hours to read through them all it would take you mere minutes to write the answer to my question. I think you have no answer if you do prove it aand write it if you dont make the usual sarcastic coment i will take it as you dont have one and will make sure i dont ask you any difficult questions in future.