Originally Posted by Less (Post 992194)

But, are you allowed to say that without a veiled threat of litigation coming your way?

(Even though he uses this thread, he who shall not be named hasn't answered your original question has he?).

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 992196)

When has anyone been threatened with litigation?

Originally Posted by Less (Post 992194)

But, are you allowed to say that without a veiled threat of litigation coming your way?

(Even though he uses this thread, he who shall not be named hasn't answered your original question has he?).

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 992199)

What happened with the legal proceedings that were started against yourself, when another local councillor claimed what you'd posted on here was lies?

Has the matter now been settled?

Originally Posted by Less (Post 992200)

I mentioned a veiled threat, wish you could get, 'he who must not be named' to answer this thread as quick as you jumped on me.

No wonder I think a great deal less of you as each day passes.

Don't bother getting in touch with Lawyers, It isn't libel, it isn't slander, that is what I think, I take it even in your world I'm allowed to think?
:mad:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 992202)

Yes, he got his money.

Then he got voted off the council.

Swings and roundabouts.

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 992196)

When has anyone been threatened with litigation?

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 992207)

Well the MP sent me a PM about repeating hearsay on this website, I think he did the same to another member too, but that's what he does, besides stabbing his constituents in the back that is, and kissing Mr Eds feet

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 992205)

You did post something which wasn't true on here, a public forum?

Originally Posted by Less (Post 992200)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Moss http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/s...s/viewpost.gif
When has anyone been threatened with litigation?



I mentioned a veiled threat, wish you could get, 'he who must not be mentioned' to answer this thread as quick as you jumped on me.

No wonder I think a great deal less of you as each day passes.

Don't bother getting in touch with Lawyers, It isn't libel, it isn't slander, that is what I think, I take it even in your world I'm allowed to think?
:mad:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 992203)

Unlike certain Conservative councillors, I have no intention of suing anyone for expressing an opinion.

I wish I could get my head around what it is you're actually trying to say, any chance of a reply in plain English?

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 992211)

Apparently so. I just found it interesting that all references to the point which triggered my 'factual mishap' were seemingly absent from council minutes after that.

Originally Posted by Less (Post 992213)

Ah, attack being the best form of defence, you attempt to make me seem as simple as thee.

Allow me to assist, if you are conceited enough to think YOU, are, 'he that must not be mentioned', then you are wrong, your jump, your own wrong conclusion.

Read back to some advice in this thread from the one named in the title.

Now, allow me one last sentence, I thought you might be good for the Borough, you got voted in, now actually get on and do something and stop disappointing me.
.

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 992207)

Well the MP sent me a PM about repeating hearsay on this website, I think he did the same to another member too, but that's what he does, besides stabbing his constituents in the back that is, and kissing Mr Eds feet

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 992211)

Apparently so. I just found it interesting that all references to the point which triggered my 'factual mishap' were seemingly absent from council minutes after that.

It was a hugely defamatory statement...which failed to ignite much interest in the local press.

I made two public apologies, the Labour group paid up the money, smiles happy day.

Apologies once again for my error.