Re: Boston Bombing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Restless
(Post 1054605)
its like what I see on facebook- I always see pics that say "bring back hanging" etc and then same people share "white and proud say no to sharia law"... Some of these trashy people would probably like sharia law if it was a "white" law....
|
Wouldn't worry about this bs if I were you. There's enough of the hang 'em high crowd on here. They remind me of Monty Python's four Yorkshiremen: "Rippin' 'is arms off an shovin' up 'is ass is too good for him, Obediah. How can you stop shopliftin' if you treat 'em wi' kid gloves" ... That kind of thing .... it's just noise. And they seem to compete. Who can come up with the cruelest punishment? However inept and stoopid our politicians are, they ain't gonna bring back torture and hanging, drawing and quartering. Fortunately, I live in a country where a Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees that I am protected from "cruel and unusual punishment." Those same hang 'em high guys also seem to be the ones who talk of "human rights" and "civil rights" as if they were obscenities. When the ACLU talks of the civil right of the Boston bomber to have his Miranda rights, they are not thinking of him so much as the other 326,842,791 Americans (that's a guess, by the way;)) But rather than dwelling on the punishments in Sharia law, and they are cruel and unusual enough, think of the crimes. Blasphemy! Gimme a break, eh. And women facing trial and punishment for the heinous crime of being the victim of a gang rape.
Whatever. There's a "clear and present danger" ... And our politicians have a choice: Do they want to line up behind Chamberlain, or behind Churchill? For me, it's a no brainer.
|