Re: Alan Rogers
 

I'm afraid thats exactly what he did Redraine, Ricki wasn't ill or injured because he was asked in the bar after the game and said no, when asked why he thought he hadn't even been on the bench poor lad just shrugged his shoulders. I'm a big fan of Leam Richardson's but he was lost at right back yesterday, ok if we had no-one else to fill that position but as has been said before - what about Phil Edwards? Also the substitution of Toddy (by far our best player this season so far) for Mangy mystified me

Re: Alan Rogers
 

I agree Bains should not have been sacrificed as hes been playing well as R/back, the 4 games hes been involved in proofs that, why change a winning team. Does anyone know why he wasn't picked?

Re: Alan Rogers
 

why was Edwards not playing should be a regularly first team player, solid defender, does JC know what he's doing?

sorry but I feel he hasn't a clue

Re: Alan Rogers
 

Baines wasn't playing because obviously like others before him his face does not fit, the lad looks really promising too me. Coleman is being far to loyal certain players who quite frankly are out of their depth (including the management come to think of it).

On another note can the club please issue Mr Rogers with a larger pair of shorts for his next appearance, those yesterday were sprayed on, no wonder he wanted an early bath!

Re: Alan Rogers
 

To not have Bains on the bench, instead of Doherty, was strange indeed, (especially with Welchy struggling with an injury at present).

Why change a winning team? Thanks for that, made me laugh ;) .

Re: Alan Rogers
 

How can Baines face not fit he's gorgeous if only I was 18 years younger,
your right JC needs to get his finger out, and put players on that perform and give 100% every game, the likes of Edwards, Baines and Jacobs. Will be pleased to see Dunbavin back a.s.a.p

Re: Alan Rogers
 

what I meant was that we have conceded less goals playing Edwards and Baines.

glad I made you laugh

Re: Alan Rogers
 

Disgusting!