![]() |
Re: Transfer embargo
Khan resignation to be confirmed next month (From Lancashire Telegraph)
Stanley’s transfer embargo may not be lifted until next week at the earliest after a further delay in finalising the annual accounts. So does that mean "next Tuesday" is out of the window now? :confused: |
Re: Transfer embargo
Curiouser & curiouser - it's getting more & more difficult to make head nor tail of what is going on at Stanley This time of year i'm usually excited & full of anticipation at the prospect of a brand new season but i'm finding it more & more difficult not to be extremely worried about the current state of our club
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
Re: Transfer embargo
This is a take on the last twelve months or so, in the absence of any inside information whatsoever and based purely on conjecture from what I read on this and the other sites. I think it could be basis of a new soap if anyone from the BBC is reading.
Stanley never kept 'books' like any other business; cash slopped around from turnstile to pocket. The chairman and others may or may not have put money into the club but no-one knows or can prove the truth. But soon enough, the Cardboard Millionaire saw what was about to happen and jumped ship to the SS Chester before the proverbial hit the financial fan. The D'On hoped he could but discovered he couldn't buy outright control or stop the fan. Messrs Khan and Marsden stepped up at last minute and threw themselves and their wallets in front of the fan to save the club. The payback was a thorough audit but that proves tricky as no books were kept (c'mon, keep up). The Cardboard Millionaire, having watched SS Chester go down with all hands on board, bobs up in his lifevest and demands his dues. But there's no agreement or proof of who owes who what, when and why. Meanwhile, the fan keep whirring as cash dries up again over the summer. Break for adverts. Join us again "next week" for the next episode. :confused: |
Re: Transfer embargo
Not long now! :):):)
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Have we one or two embargoes?
I ask because Southend have an embargo for owing the PFA monies and I couldn't remember if we still had any outstanding loans with them. My memory isn't as good as it was? |
Re: Transfer embargo
To the best of my knowledge we are under embargo for the books being late, but who knows????
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
Re: Transfer embargo
It's been mentioned on more than one occasion the problem is with the opening balances. Opening balances inlcude outstanding debts, of which any loans would be classed as. In 20 years working in IT supporting accounting systems, I have never ever seen a signed fag packet as proof of loan, I somehow don't think the authorities class this as official documentation :)
|
Re: Transfer embargo
to register any previous full year accounts they will have to detail the apparent loans made by the cardboard millionaire (and presumably where this money was spent). Once it is documented then that will be an admissable debt by the club and will have to be paid back. Whatever we 'invent' the accounts to be will have to be accepted by both the club and Mr Whalley as true and accurate Mr Whalley. That is what I assume the hold ups to be. We don't want the debt to appear and he wants it to be as high as possible. But for it to be as high as possible we/he need to prove where that money went for it to have been spent - not forgetting that over £300k worth of tax wasn't paid neither then a huge hole appears in our finances
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
Re: Transfer embargo
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:43. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com