Peter Cavanagh is Innocent - Page 7

cashman · 24-02-2010, 13:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker

Seems odd that people are happy to go up Stanley while O'Neill & two of the Whalleys still swan about, but talk of Cav coming back and it's, "it'll be Clitheroe for me!". Nowt as queer as folk.

load of balls, aint happy about that at all, n as fer nowt as queer as folk, ya need to look in the mirror.

i did not go near stanley when coley carried on playing cav n rocky, as i believed it should never have been, i still think the same, its called having principles.

shakermaker · 24-02-2010, 13:59

Don't those principles stand for Whalley/DO'N?

The point I'm trying to make is that no one is bigger than the team. If Coley chooses to re-sign Cav then some will be happy, some won't. Some are ok with the aforementioned geezers being around the club on match-days whereas I can't stand them being within 100 miles of Livvy Road. But because it's Stanley, we support the lads on the pitch regardless.

cashman · 24-02-2010, 14:10

i was told whalley was a paying spectator on sat, much as i dont like it, sod all anyone can do about that. as fer the Don someone has to run the ship like it or not, therefore i accepted ilyas word about that. n as fer supporting stanley regardless, thats fine as long as the players do. those who bet against the club, hell will freeze oer before i have any truck wi them, dont ya dare question my principles ever again.

shakermaker · 24-02-2010, 14:29

Sorry cashy if you think I was questioning your principles; I really, really wasn't. I was merely comparing the two situations to make a point. I'm unable to make that point any better so I'll bow out now as this thread has already started to descend into the ridiculous. I support Cav, believe his innocence and hope we sign him back. I really couldn't care less if people disagree, though it's sad to see. That's all.

cashman · 24-02-2010, 14:31

accepted.

DAV007 · 24-02-2010, 17:04

never trust Oneill, never did and never will

VALAIRIAN · 24-02-2010, 18:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

That is all, roll on April!

2000 views, 100 replies and not 48 hours of a thread! You really know how to liven things up man

maccawozzagod · 24-02-2010, 19:50

... but it did provoke some negativity

Outback Ozzy · 24-02-2010, 21:50

I'm with you Cashman, None of the players who were suspended should ever be allowed to pull on the red shirt of Accrington Stanley ever again. They cheated, not only the club, but the supporters of Accrington Stanley and anyway, the defence we have now is doing rather better than when Cav and Rocky played for Stanley, best season we have had for a couple of years. If other teams want them, then so be it, but not Stanley please.

Willie Miller · 25-02-2010, 11:30

This thread has been ruined by admin not deleting when I told them too....

Shame , Cav is Innocent!

Willie Miller · 25-02-2010, 11:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN

2000 views, 100 replies and not 48 hours of a thread! You really know how to liven things up man

It was only supposed to get "I agree, Baaaa"

Neil · 25-02-2010, 11:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

This thread has been ruined by admin not deleting when I told them too....

Shame , Cav is Innocent!

I am sorry but this site is not moderated to be exclusive to an individuals point of view.

This is a discussion forum where people can say what they want as long as they stay within the site rules.

It would be very boring if all the posts just said "I agree, Baaaa"

Willie Miller · 25-02-2010, 12:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

I am sorry but this site is not moderated to be exclusive to an individuals point of view.

This is a discussion forum where people can say what they want as long as they stay within the site rules.

It would be very boring if all the posts just said "I agree, Baaaa"

Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh!

Reamer · 25-02-2010, 12:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willie Miller

It was only supposed to get "I agree, Baaaa"

Yeh, right ! That was never the response you were gonna get and well you know it. So come on Willie, care to expand on the real reasons for this thread ? Why start a thread and then try to get it quashed ?

Stanleymad · 25-02-2010, 12:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

I am sorry but this site is not moderated to be exclusive to an individuals point of view.

This is a discussion forum where people can say what they want as long as they stay within the site rules.

It would be very boring if all the posts just said "I agree, Baaaa"

I think the windup merchant has been wound up

lol