Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Err...just out of interest..can someone explain (Re: Post #193) how a lead coffin can float away?
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
They said an iron ship wouldn't float-it did! If the weight of water displaced by the coffin is more than the weight of the coffin it will float.A lot of air was probably trapped inside the lead lining and it was in a wooden box. So it would displace a lot of water.
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
It must work on a similar basis to the stone coffin of St James, which, having been lost in a shipwreck in the Med, eventually ended up many years later at Santiago de Compostela in Northern Spain (allegedly).
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Busman747, keep them coming, it's lovely seeing them. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
The Gazette office in Abbey St.....
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...ystgazette.jpg Is that a pub on the corner? would that be the pub that was asked about in this thread http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...ubs-53656.html |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
do ya mean just past the 3 rd lampost to left side of photo ken?:confused:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Yeah, but could the one on the nearest corner be a pub??
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Talking of the lamp posts, wish I had a few of them, got a few quid from selling motorway columns and street lamps, them would be worth a fortune
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Does anyone know of a miss H.S.Brown who would have been in her teenage years in 1897 and would have been a "bad" girl? :rolleyes:
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2.../10pounds1.jpg This following letter is very much tongue-in-cheek but quite topical :Dhttp://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...hotos/aids.jpg |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Better get back on the subject of photo's, how about the Oak Tree in Abbey St? (No idea what the donkey was trying to do!)
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...os/Abbeyst.jpg |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
A montage of shots, I didn't want to split them up as this is the way John has presented them in his albums..........
The first is Bull Bridge in 1901 where the site is being cleared for the new drill hall The second is the Coppice at a much later date but clear of most trees and the ones that are there are deciduous........;) Can someone help me out on the third one please? http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...ullbridge1.jpg |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Busman, the third shot's at the bottom of the Coppice, looking towards the back of the bowling green pavillion that you can see on the right of the second shot.
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Thank you Wynonie :D
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
why is Bull Bridge called Bull Bridge?
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
I imagine because of The Black Bull pub, which was in this area. It was where the back entrance to our car park is, directly facing Hyndburn Road.
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
The second of those three pictures is the coppice as I remember it when I was a lad before all the trees were planted,to my mind think it looked better then than it does now
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
ok, thankyou :D
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
In the 2nd Photo also taken outside the Oak Tree Inn, (on the corner with Birtwistle St), the chap, leaning on the side of the hot potato boiler, if I'm not mistaken is called Slipper, him and Bunny used to run a few enterprises together, such as selling fruit & veg and light carting, moonlight flits etc. I knew Bunny and his 3 sons, the youngest was called Gilbert. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Did you know that in 1888, a dog in Accy had rabies? :eek:
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...s/document.jpg ...........and can you remember this bridge? :D(Howard & Bleakley) http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2.../Ormerodst.jpg |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
..........and finally (for tonight) the pillars are so recognisable but it's nice to see their original purpose! :D
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...os/railway.jpg |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
What a thread, love the rail photo
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
How many of you are aware that Accrington had its own gliding club? All google references are from 1931 as far as I can see and the Secretary had his office (home address?) at 67, Eagle St. Check out the top photo, the other photos on the page are Broadoak, The Conservative club and at the bottom, Woodnook.
http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k2...tos/glider.jpg This is an interesting article from 1931, you can buy a "sailplane kit" for only £95-00 what a bargain!!:rolleyes: http://www.lakesgc.co.uk/mainwebpage...022%201931.pdf Here is a small piece from the above website, it didn't take well to being copied and pasted into word, but you will get the drift.... THE ACCRINGTON GLIDING CLUB. The score or so members of the Accrington Club who were present at Be-aeon Fell on ~1ay 17 were much interested in the pel'formances of their own llrimary glider. a fIansectt, which is of German manufacture, and the Preston Club's glider. a R.F.D.. made by an English South country firm. Unfortunately the Bolton Club did not get their glidcr rigged, although they hud brought it on the Saturday. Fi'I~ fl.i:;hts \\>'ere made by the two Clubs, three by Accrington and two by Preston. on Sunday. and it was plainly manifest that both Clubs possess ~liders capable of putting up some remarkably ~ood performances and have outstanding pilots in their leaders-AccringtOll in Mr. Maurice Bainbridge, and Preston in l\rIr. Falla. A point in common is that both pilots have had considerable ftyina experience with the Air Force. having first flown in 1915. Mr. Bainbridge made thre~ delightful flights. reaching a point about 70 feet above his initial height and twice or so lifting on uprising currents of air. He sailed across the valley at about 180 feet in hei~ht and altogether gave a clner display of control. His times. taken by the President. Mr. Edgar Sharples. were 60 seconds in his first flight and I minute 40 seconds on the second flight. Mr. Falla had rather shorter flights. but they, too. y,'cre highly demonstrative of the thrills of gliding. The glider was brought back to Accrington by one 'of the motorist members, Mr. Croasdale, and a few enthusiasts WllO had camped on the site on Saturday nigllt within |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Again more very interesting stuff Busman
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
I have really enjoyed reading through this thread from start to finish - very interesting and informative. I sincerely hope there will be more to come. You have all taught me such a lot about my home town. Such a privilege to learn so much. For a kid of the 80's its been an eye opener. Thankyou!!
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Have a feeling Mr Nolan was connected with the flying club. Will make further enquiries.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...79-a-4097.html |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Some really great photos there. Brilliant thread.
Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Nice to see the old Odeon. I went there to see 'The Exorcist' (which scared the **** out of me) and 'The Life of Brian' neither of which were screened in Blackburn at the time of release, as our council banned them:eek: |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Wasn't somebody after a photo of the railway crossing the lodge ?
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
BLACKBURN PAST Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Well from my quick research Walter & co, the Slaters Arms wasn't 21 or 23 Whalley Road, that was the Hope & Anchor Hotel at numbers 21-23 Whalley Rd (still is from what I can gather). The Slaters Arms was at number 13 Whalley Road and was on the corner of Marquis Street. I don't know if Marquis Street still exists? According to my reference books, Whalley Rd began at Abbey Street. You then had numbers 1,3,5,7,9 and 11 (then cross Marquis St) continuing with number 13 (Slaters Arms), 15 (a temperance bar), 17 (once a newsagent), 19 and the the Hope & Anchor at 21 -23. Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
As far as I know Marquis Street became Broadway, the Slaters was across Whalley Road from the Peel's Arms (now the Broadway)
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Also have a look at post 168 in this thread
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Cheers Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I've marked the Slaters Arms with a little red cross on the map. It wasn't marked PH like the other nearby pubs, probably because it was a 'beerhouse' (that's what it's listed as in my directories) rather than a fully licenced Public House. Cheers Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
What criteria does qualify one as an historian? |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I've spent more than 7 times that researching into the history of Accrington, and its people, spending a lot of time in Libraries and Public Record Offices. I've got nearly 100,000 names of births marriges and deaths, plus census records, in this computer, going back to around 1100 AD, that does not including all the local men who served in WW1, which is close on 15000 individuals, all slowly typed in, from my original card index's, not scanned in or photocopied. I think I qualify as a local historian just a bit more than some one who has a couple of trade directories. I've also been criticised many times, for doing what I do, but its never bothered me. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I really don't know who you think you are and why you think you are the only one that knows anything about everything to do with Local History and why you continue to rubbish other peoples imput. Very sad |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I also thought ''Well if he is so obnoxious as to belittle others in public, let's just put him straight'' ie, you were about 5 properties away with your 1869 ''fact'' as the Slaters wasn't at number 23 as you boldly stated, it was at number 13. No a couple of old directories don't make one a historian, but they do make you WRONG. :tongueout |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
I think that you new members need to know that Retlaw is a very elderly gentleman who has spent a lifetime amassing material relevant to WW1 and Accrington Pals especially.
His knowledge of Accrington in times past is partly dependant on having lived it, and also from his extensive research on the topic. He may appear a little brusque at times, but he has my respect, and I think that other forum members think the same. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Which is possibly why the majority of people don't bother with local history.;) Still, I do enjoy looking at the old photographs and have enjoyed the comments that accompanied them. So thanks to the person responsible for posting them initially. Now, I'm going to nip down to the Slaters Arms to drown my sorrows and reflect on my sins. Whatever was I thinking of, questioning an historian. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
still if you want to believe them thats up to you. And that to you as well:tongueout:tongueout:tongueout:tongueout:tongu eout |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Which is possibly why the majority of people don't bother with local history.;)
Still, I do enjoy looking at the old photographs and have enjoyed the comments that accompanied them. So thanks to the person responsible for posting them initially. Now, I'm going to nip down to the Slaters Arms to drown my sorrows and reflect on my sins. Whatever was I thinking of, questioning an historian.[/quote] Those old photographs you are on aout from John Kelly's albums. I've known John since he was about 10 years old, and worked alongside him for a good number of years, we shared photo's and information. Several of the photo's shown in the threads came from my collections. Does that make John as bad as me. When you get to Slaters Arms in Whalley Road make sure you go in the right door. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Just try and keep an open mind and get used to his style. If you ask him a direct question, he will pull out all the stops to try and help you. Met him for the first time on Saturday, and found him absolutely charming. He was very busy helping someone with (I think) their Ancestry queries, with great patience. To me, he rocks. :D:D |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Met a few people on Saturday looking for their granddad, good job I took my lap top, some interesting queries cropped up. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
''Just keep your visor on Harry and don't look up'' |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
It seems to me Walter that they aren't all locked away in Broadmoor. Now I know why Harold got shot in the eye in 1066, he was looking up for the Vodaphone mast so that he could get a better signal on his telephone to ring blackburnlad; and I though mobile phones were a modern invention, you learn something everyday on Accyweb. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I don't use Kelly Directories or any of the others, because of the errors in them. Also many Pubs and Ale Houses in different locations, have used the same name, over the past 150 years, so what a place was called in 1850, doesn't mean it has the same name in 1920. If you want to solve a mystery, where was the Rose and Crown in Accrington, some of those directories list it as being in Old Accrington & others in New Accrington, even on streets which didn't exist. It must have had wheels on it, it moved around so much. Retlaw |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
So as you say, back in 1869 the address of the Slaters Arms, whether it was the pictured premises or a premises further along could very well have been number 21, but that isn't really relevant to the location of the pub pictured, which was the theme of the thread. Take a look at the little section of the OS map I stuck on here the other night. The premises I marked with a red cross is the premises in the photo(s). Next count the individual properties from the corner of Peel St, where almost everyone agreed was the start of Whalley Rd. You have number 1 on the curved corner of Peel St, then 3, 5, 7, 9 (then there's a yard or something), then the last property on that block (number 11), cross Marquis St and you have the Slaters Arms at number 13. Pubs changed names at times, sometimes even changed house number / premises number, but I'm convinced that the pub in the photo was number 13 Whalley Road when the photo was taken (not 21 and not 23). |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I could have sworn that you referred to a directory, but if not, then my apologies. Where then did you source the fact that in 186? it was at number 23? The census returns possibly (they never contained errors did they;)). Not that it matters, as I have just explained to katex, the photo under discussion was an early 20th century image, not a mid 19th century one. At the time the photo was taken, the Slaters was number 13. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
What's that old saying 'Don't believe everything you read in the papers' Not for a second saying they were wrong back in 1869 mind you, they were probably right, but as in my last two comments, it's information that is totally irrelevant to the 1920's / 30's photo that was being discussed. Anyway, I'm trying to watch the football,so got to go. have a pleasant evening ! |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Take a look at the little section of the OS map I stuck on here the other night. The premises I marked with a red cross is the premises in the photo(s). Next count the individual properties from the corner of Peel St, where almost everyone agreed was the start of Whalley Rd. You have number 1 on the curved corner of Peel St, then 3, 5, 7, 9 (then there's a yard or something), then the last property on that block (number 11), cross Marquis St and you have the Slaters Arms at number 13.
Pubs changed names at times, sometimes even changed house number / premises number, but I'm convinced that the pub in the photo was number 13 Whalley Road when the photo was taken (not 21 and not 23).[/quote] There was a lot more property on Whalley Rd from the top of Peel St, to the junction with Marquis St. Peel St wasn't always as wide as that, and the numbers didn't jump the empty space, you refer to as a yard, empty plots which were intended for property, were included in the numbering system, when house numbering became compulsory in the late 1850's. Your 1909 map may be right for that year, but thats all it is, right for that year. There are many streets and roads in Accrington with gaps in the numbering system Warner St has been renumbered from top to bottom and bottom to top twice since 1860. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
To prove newspapers made gross errors can be found on Accringon's War Memorial, most of those names came from the Greater Accrington Roll of Honour, which has resulted in 11 men being named twice, through printing errors. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
I think his danders up:D
|
Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Time for a truce please fellas
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I've attached further proof that it was originally 21& 23 Whalley Rd, The licensing renewals show it & the 1871 Census gives the same information. How much more proof is he going to need, before he puts his hand up. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Your 1909 map may be right for that year, but thats all it is, right for that year. There are many streets and roads in Accrington with gaps in the numbering system Warner St has been renumbered from top to bottom and bottom to top twice since 1860. Retlaw.[/QUOTE] Heck Walt, you don't need a degree in town planning to see that the old 1909 map and the 2 photos match perfectly. In the second photo that shows both the Slaters and the Peel/Broadway pub, you can see they were more or less opposite one another. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
You are clutching at straws sir and your comment ''Why should I back down when I know I'm right'' just about says it all. There's not even a mere hint from you to suggest that I might (just might) be correct. It's that arrogance and attitude that brought me into this discussion. I took umbrage at the fact that you were (seemingly) reprimanding more junior members, because they dared to offer opinions on a discussion that you had already decided was done and dusted (even though it wasn't). Yes, you carry on telling everyone you're right, produce as many documents you like (irrelevant as they are), but if people study the evidence enough, they will arrive at their own conclusion. I've had enough experience when researching local history to know that no single source is evidence enough, there's a need to cross reference and cross reference again, but if some want to believe you are right, because YOU say you're right, that is their choice. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Who would of though Local History could be so intence.
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
I've never disputed that it was on the opposite corner to the Peel. My argument is the number of the property, 21& 23 Whalley Rd, both in the licencing renewals, and the 1871 census show the same man in the same prroperty 21 & 23 Whalley Rd. 1860, 1909 or 1920, the property had the same number. Retlaw. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Dont stop now Retlaw and Blacburnlad. I do so enjoy your little contretemps. Long may it continue.
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
My argument is the number of the property, 21& 23 Whalley Rd, both in the licencing renewals, and the 1871 census show the same man in the same prroperty 21 & 23 Whalley Rd. 1860, 1909 or 1920, the property had the same number. Retlaw.[/QUOTE] At the risk of repeating myself, the 1860's licensing report and the 1871 census return have no relevance to the building in the photograph. I had a look in the ref library today (Blackburn) and every trade directory they have between 1900 and 1938 have the Slaters Arms as number 13 Whalley Road. Now bear in mind Walter, that if number 13 was wrong, it would throw out every number on Whalley Road (on that side of the street anyway). Now I could understand an error being made one year, perhaps even being overlooked when the next edition was published, but over a 38 year period, you would think someone along Whalley Road would have contacted Barratt's (Preston) and complained because their home, shop, business or pub was listed with the wrong address. I'm pretty sure, in fact quite certain that a reputable compiler of directories (they produced them from the 1870's - 1966) like Barratt's would have amended their mistake and apologised to all affected. The census returns are usually completed / filled out by hired hands, for one day, once every 10 years. Often they would be scribbling details in semi darkness, bored to tears with going through the same set of questions at each door and probably wondering what they'd be having for their supper when they got home. Mistakes could easily be made and with very little scope for the scribbler to amend his / her errors. They probably walked away from doors thinking ''I'm definitely not volunteering for this next time around, was that number 13 or was I at number 23, oh beggar it, no-one will check'' If you came to me in 20 years time with the 1931 census return with who was at the Slaters then, I would still have my doubts at the illegible scrawl in front of me. I'm sure they have their use, the returns, but like everything (including Barratt's directories) they shouldn't be read as Gospel. As we're putting everyone to sleep, I'm making this my last on this topic (thank goodness for that, I hear people saying), but I would say to anyone else either involved earlier in this thread or perhaps joining it in the future, don't accept my word, don't accept Walter's word (not even if he attempts to humiliate you, as a novice), I would advise you look at the evidence and arrive at your own conclusion. Byeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Fascinating thread, and some interesting opinions.
The 1917-1919 army service record of Edward Marshall Crook shows his address as Hope & Anchor, 21-23 Whalley Road. If that's any help. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I have just one directory from that period, the 1925 one. I'll try and attach a portion of the Whalley Rd listing. You may need to download my photo and enlarge it a little to read it. Some of the names at various addresses changed from edition to edition, as you would expect, people moving house, businesses changing hands, properties being used for other purposes, but the house numbering didn't change and the Slaters Arms was listed in all of the ones I flipped through, as being at No 13 (the landlord changed over the years, but that's all). Colin |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
My humble theory is that there are a few mistakes here and other people have just followed these mistakes. I think when there was that gap in the block from Peel Street to Marquis Street, the enumerator just counted all the buildings. Probably didn't have the door number on display.
Why should they change the numbers and then back again (Hope and Anchor is now listed as 27-31)? It would be obvious only a temporary gap. Looked at the 1911 census and does show a beer seller there at no. 13 and a licensed vitualler at No. 19 (Hope and Anchor)which would be correct to line up with No.13. However, there are two entries for No. 13 ??... the second one being a Medical Practiioner. Another emission on this census is not showing a 21 and 23 ... why's that I wonder ? Mind you, it is also showing No. 31 as Dykenook !! |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
Attached is the full page of the 1871 census.
Which also shows the addess of the hope & Anchor. As for the Harrogate Tripe Dresser chipping in, he would be better occupied sorting out the mess he's made of William Turners work. As well as the mess he made of the Greater Accrington Roll of Honour, there are men in those Rolls who never existed & a lot you can't find. Retlaw |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
thats me knackered it says 1971 william wilkinson census.:confused:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Retlaw |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
1 Attachment(s)
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
I suppose if they did change them 'back' at one time, there must have been some sort of newspaper announcement about it, as would be a big thing to do ... all the way up Whalley Road, and in the public interest to be informed. Not an easy job.. if it is there at all ... :eek: Or records buried deep in the Town Hall somewhere.
In the 1928 map, it is showing a large building where the demolished properties were. So could have been between 1925-28 ? |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
As I said Retlaw was clutching at straws. I'm sure on some streets and roads (in any town or city) you could have gaps between properties ranging from a few feet to a thousand yards. The enumerators wouldn't give every vacant plot a number just because they were there and there was future potential for development would they? Again, even though I said I was finished with this thread, I must stress that the early census returns have no relevance, or at best very little relevance to a late 1920's photograph. As for two entries at number 13, a beer seller and a medical practitioner, that wouldn't be unusual in a property that size. In theory you could have multiple people living in a single premises. If the beer seller was only making use of a few rooms on the ground floor for his business and living accommodation, he would have had a similar amount of rooms on the first storey that he supplemented his income with each week, by renting out (or vice versa, maybe the doctor rented rooms to the beer seller). |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
|
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
Let me be absolutely clear. The Accrington Pals website is built on my own research into primary sources extending back over more than 30 years. It has been supported by generous help both from countless relatives of Pals, and from military historians, particularly those in Burnley and Chorley, who believe as I do that discoveries are meant to be shared. These are the facts, and I am not going to enter into a debate about them. Walter, you would be well advised to desist from making any further slanderous comments. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
3 Attachment(s)
As I said Retlaw was clutching at straws. I'm sure on some streets and roads (in any town or city) you could have gaps between properties ranging from a few feet to a thousand yards. The enumerators wouldn't give every vacant plot a number just because they were there and there was future potential for development would they?
Clutching at straws thats a laugh, its thee thats clutching at straws. The Hope and Anchor is numbered 27 & 29 to this day just as it was then, your numbering in the 1909 map is wrong. The first from the top of Peel St then was number 3, and the numbers carried on from there, nu 5 is now a shoe shop, what later became known as Catlows was nu 19, then on the corner with Marques St was nu 21 Slaters Arms. |
Re: Accy Old Photo's - John Kelly's Album
Quote:
There is no shame in admitting you're wrong you know. If you prove my findings wrong, I can promise you I'll be the first to come on here, holding my hands up and admit I'm wrong. But I don't see that happening any time soon. Your problem is, you have been regarded by many as some kind of local guru, because you had/have a wealth of info, statistics, resources and knowledge of your home town (and probably more besides) and because of that, you have let it go to your head and somehow felt because of your superiority on such matters that you can belittle others input with a smart quip, a put down and a few old documents, but then once in a while, along comes someone who can hold their own and you don't like it. Like one person said (katex I think), you should encourage their interest, not ridicule their ignorance. It's been fun talking to you though and you sure know your stuff, but you're not infallible, as has been proven. I honestly believe the likes of Margaret and Jaysay when they say you're a lovely man and I'll always have time for anyone that takes an interest in, has pride in and has a passion for the town where they live, but you really could try and reign in your put downs of others. It really isn't a nice trait. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com