![]() |
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
The last time that the jolly green giants (it stated paramedics across their backs) took me on a trip was when I had an extremely painful pulmonary embolism that felt like a knife sticking in my ribs with each slightest movement, even when breathing.
All they did was give me oxygen and asked a load of questions. All the jolting in the ambulance could have dislodged the blood clot and the next stop would have been the heart. It was here that speed bumps didn’t do anything for my care on the trip from Darwen to what was still then Queens Park Hospital. I should hate to have had to do that trip from Nelson to the Royal. Within minutes of arrival the casualty doctor stuck some clot busting drugs in my stomach and a morphine jab to ease the pain. After that I couldn’t care less. No matter how good the paramedic might be the real answer is getting the patient to a real doctor as quickly as possible and that means one town, one major hospital with full A & E facilities. |
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
Quote:
Not quite the figures you want for A&E but this article in todays Telegraph gives you an idea how much services have improved (NOT) by joining the services of the 2 hospitals together. Mind you the article is flawed because the information comes from a doctor at the coal face, not one of the brain dead bean counters in their swanky offices :rolleyes: Doctor's shocking claims over Blackburn and Burnley hospitals (From Lancashire Telegraph) |
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
It may well be cheaper economicaly to have one large site, but if it doesn't fulfil the purpose of good patient care then it shouldn't have happened and the decision should be reversed.
Big is not beautiful - I have only visited the place a handful of times and the layout is so vast that a long walk is needed when you get in - (not all of us are up to it) - the staff must waste time too just walking from one part of the place to another. It is proving to be a big white elephant |
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
Quote:
If I was going to find the cheapest washing machine, I'd look at the prices, I'd make an informed choice. I wouldn't just say 'That looks the cheapest', I'll have that because whilist it looks the cheapest option. The information provided on the price label is going to give me a much more accurate clue. What is more absurd is that you keep making silly comments that infer I don't care if people die. Really cashman, how ill thought out? Does it not occur to you that there is more than one option and without basing it on any facts or medical opinion you could well be wrong - am I meant to assume it's irelavent if some poor sod dies because you decided not to look at new information coming to light now that the hospitals have been merged? :rolleyes: |
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
Quote:
|
Re: Have your say
In days of old the motor manufacturing industry had huge warehouses full of parts for the cars being made. This was costing them a fortune so someone invented the “just in time system”. This is where the various parts arrived for use no more than a few hours or so before being needed. It seems to work well. Nobody on the production line was waiting for a part to assemble and huge warehouses were no longer needed.
But it also looks like the NHS has also been forced to adopt a similar scheme for patients. Once upon a time most wards had a couple of spare beds all the time, that were being kept empty for emergencies from A & E. In fact I’ve been in wards, either as a patient or visiting someone, where half the ward was empty. Then someone had a bright idea. “Lets put all the spare and empty beds into one or two wards then we can close them down and save money by getting rid of some staff.” They failed to voice the bit about leaving more of the budget to pay the managers more. Thus we now have a “just in time system” where no sooner has a bed been vacated it is filled by a new patient, usually from A & E after waiting for several hours on a trolley. Indeed there have been occasions where the situation was so critical that patients were sent home before their clinical time, just to vacate a bed. This also meant that there was no time to disinfect the bed, locker and surrounds properly before a new body is admitted. My last visit to the A & E at BRI saw me spend nigh on 24 hours on a trolley in A & E, a good portion of the time in the corridor before a cubicle became available. The cubicle became empty just in time to admit me. No food or drink except a cup of luke warm water, until a sympathetic nurse made me a cup of cup-of-soup, which I suspect was for her lunch, to quell the rumbling noises coming from a starving stomach, that could be heard for miles around. A bed was eventually found for me but at Queens Park. My point is, that as someone else has already mentioned, bigger is not necessarily better. Have the bean counters never heard of “Never put all your eggs in one basket”? Could it be that some years down the line it will become easier to privatise one large hospital rather than two or three smaller ones? Think about it! |
Re: Have your say
The thing is JB that if the bean counters save lots of money by having one big hospital to serve both the blackburn and burnley areas, then it leaves more money for their huge yearly pay increases, otherwise known as performance related bonuses, and a slap on the back from Incapability Browne, has he is now called on other web sites, which to me is quite apt really:rolleyes:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com