Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose? (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/councillors-in-hyndburn-are-they-fit-for-purpose-29532.html)

Acrylic-bob 28-03-2007 16:14

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris (Post 404338)
...although when AB and PB were growing up, they did only live about three streets away from each other, but I suppose that's just an unhappy accident of geography! :D

WHAT? Where's your proof? As far as I am aware the Idiot in Chief grew up in Ossy, Whereas I, to my certain knowlege, have NEVER lived in Ossy. I know I am getting a bit long in the tooth and the memory is not what it once was, but I think I would have remembered it, if I did, which I most certainly did not.

garinda 28-03-2007 17:00

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob (Post 404392)
WHAT? Where's your proof? As far as I am aware the Idiot in Chief grew up in Ossy, Whereas I, to my certain knowlege, have NEVER lived in Ossy. I know I am getting a bit long in the tooth and the memory is not what it once was, but I think I would have remembered it, if I did, which I most certainly did not.

Wynonie has written before how, as a child, he used to play chuff-chuffs with a young Peter in Accrington.

Perhaps you too were in the gang.;)

Acrylic-bob 28-03-2007 17:14

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 404408)
Wynonie has written before how, as a child, he used to play chuff-chuffs with a young Peter in Accrington.

Perhaps you too were in the gang.;)

Hmmm? The only Peter I knew as a child used to wet himself and smelled a bit and so we threw stones at him. Children can be dreadfully cruel.

Less 28-03-2007 17:32

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob (Post 404418)
Hmmm? The only Peter I knew as a child used to wet himself and smelled a bit and so we threw stones at him. Children can be dreadfully cruel.

Unfortunately their aim can also be a little inaccurate as well, a decent shot with a Nori might have saved a lot of grief for a lot of people. :D

Acrylic-bob 28-03-2007 18:47

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Chuck it haste......and repent at leisure.

Wynonie Harris 28-03-2007 20:01

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob (Post 404392)
WHAT? Where's your proof? As far as I am aware the Idiot in Chief grew up in Ossy,

Afraid not A-B, young Peter spent his formative years in a shop on the corner of Willows Lane and Charter Street which is just a short stroll down Crossland Street and through the "underground" to Grant Street! As Garinda points out, I know this because I was a youthful playmate of his.

So you see, you're both from the same 'hood! :D

Acrylic-bob 28-03-2007 21:38

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
What can I say? I'm gobsmacked!

I do not recall any child living in either of the shops at the junction of Charter street and Willows Lane. I have racked what is left of my brains but I do not recall either of the occupants being called Britcliffe either. The couple who ran the grocery shop were childless and the couple who ran the Off Licence were too old. There was a third shop opposite the junction but I do not remember that ever being open. There was a small grocery/sweet shop at the top of Crossland Street which was run by an old lady and another facing the top of Crossland Street which I dimly recall having children but they always seemed to me to be a bit of an odd family. And where does Nora Butcher fit into all this????

Anyone care to supplement my memory?????

garinda 28-03-2007 22:33

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob (Post 404558)
I have racked what is left of my brains but I do not recall either of the occupants being called Britcliffe either. The couple who ran the grocery shop were childless and the couple who ran the Off Licence were too old.

May I suggest that you perhaps rent a DVD of the BBC series the League of Gentlemen. In it there was also a local shop, for local people, run by Edward, and his lovely wife Tubs. They also had a child, too grotesque for public view, and kept him chained up in an attic.;)


http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...e+of+gentlemen

http://sandalsandsocks.typepad.com/p...ized/log_1.jpg

Wynonie Harris 29-03-2007 07:31

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob (Post 404558)
Anyone care to supplement my memory?????

It was the off-licence, A-B! That's where Mr and Mrs Britcliffe lived with their son, Peter in the 50's and 60's. You're right about that family in the shop facing the top of Crossland Street, though!

Sorry about the thread wander, folks, but I'm just passing the time until Gondola comes back with his promised revelations. :)

Ianto.W. 29-03-2007 13:16

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Getting back on thread, without wanting to drag the Taxi driver thread back but, as this is supposed to be about councillors fit for purpose, as with the bouquets go the brickbats, has anyone reisigned or been asked to, with regard to the disgracefull handling of this driver being granted a licence to drive a taxi, with a sexual offenders record?, or are all and sundry running round like headless chickens hoping it will dissapear. It may be that the cleaners are busy sweeping it under the carpet, as there has been a pregnant silence for sometime.

jimmyjim 29-03-2007 14:35

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
gondola... I read with interest and laugh out really loud.... this "carry on council" we curently put up never fail to amaze me with the depths they will stoop to......... ANYTHING that highlights the incompitancies of "Sid Britcliffe" &"Hattie Battle" over looked by the likes of "Bernard Tanti" & "Barbara Ellis" HAS to be high lighted and put into the mix AND i will always question anyone who finds it necessary to speak or write anything detrimental against such an action.............. BRAVO

lancsdave 29-03-2007 14:39

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyjim (Post 404758)
gondola... I read with interest and laugh out really loud.... this "carry on council" we curently put up never fail to amaze me with the depths they will stoop to......... ANYTHING that highlights the incompitancies of "Sid Britcliffe" &"Hattie Battle" over looked by the likes of "Bernard Tanti" & "Barbara Ellis" HAS to be high lighted and put into the mix AND i will always question anyone who finds it necessary to speak or write anything detrimental against such an action.............. BRAVO


As you appear to think gondola has actually told us anything perhaps you can share it with the rest of us ? :)

jimmyjim 29-03-2007 14:53

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
its a pity you cant read into whats being said as quick as you can come up with a respose....

lancsdave 29-03-2007 14:59

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmyjim (Post 404764)
its a pity you cant read into whats being said as quick as you can come up with a respose....

Yep :rolleyes:

Bazf 29-03-2007 15:22

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
My god!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! they are one and the same!!!!!!!

gondola 29-03-2007 15:26

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Mindful of the unrelated discussion on here the past day or so, I thought for a moment I had stumbled onto the wrong thread. Such a moment of madness was only made possible by the fact that that the very people who lambasted me with accusations of derailing the other thread were responsible here for deviating from the title of this thread. Fortunately, Ianto has insisted on restoring discussion to matters of importance.

I see thus far, notwithstanding the fact that I have invited others, most notably Councillor Jones, to come up with a name or two of individuals that have resigned their positions of responsibility (forming part of their duties as Councillors), there have been no offerings. In the unlikely event that this information is not known to them, here’s another clue. Jean Battle was on the same Committee as one at the time. Surely that narrows it down somewhat.

I wonder why the resignation was tendered. Was it prompted by an extraordinary misjudgement, or directly attributed to the fact that such woeful actions were considered incongruous with the professed principles of an upstanding member of society that a Councillor ought to be

garinda 29-03-2007 15:32

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Do you not think you'd have got a better response to your thread if you'd have used better, clearer English?

Then we might know what the hell you're waffling on about.

Neil 29-03-2007 15:35

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
That is all part of the game he is playing.

garinda 29-03-2007 15:36

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 404808)
That is all part of the game he is playing.


Yeah, solitaire.;)

Neil 29-03-2007 15:44

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
He is getting a little boring now.
gondola if you wants to tell us something then just tell us. If not then go and write to the Observer, their readers expect to wait a week for a reply. On a forum we expect it a little quicker than that or we move onto something else.

accymel 29-03-2007 15:49

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I think he is after someones job:rolleyes:

gondola 29-03-2007 15:51

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
''we move onto something else''.

You write as though I have made it mandatory for you to visit this thread. I have set up this thread for those that have an interest in it's content. If it leaves you bored, then surely you ought to cease viewing it. Expressing your frustration that it leaves you bored is a little baffling. After all, there are hundreds of different threads on this site for you to vist. Why do you insist on returning to the one that leaves you bored, and then be sufficiently audacious to complain about the same.

Less 29-03-2007 15:56

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404814)
''we move onto something else''.

You write as though I have made it mandatory for you to visit this thread. I have set up this thread for those that have an interest in it's content. If it leaves you bored, then surely you ought to cease viewing it. Expressing your frustration that it leaves you bored is a little baffling. After all, there are hundreds of different threads on this site for you to vist. Why do you insist on returning to the one that leaves you bored, and then be sufficiently audacious to complain about the same.

Perhaps because secretly we are all besotted by you and wish we could be you? After all you have such a way with words and an attitude to kill for.:D

Neil 29-03-2007 16:21

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404814)
Why do you insist on returning to the one that leaves you bored, and then be sufficiently audacious to complain about the same.

I am just hoping you might actually tell us something interesting instead of waiting until it fits in with your real agenda.

Bazf 29-03-2007 16:46

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404814)
''we move onto something else''.

You write as though I have made it mandatory for you to visit this thread. I have set up this thread for those that have an interest in it's content. If it leaves you bored, then surely you ought to cease viewing it. Expressing your frustration that it leaves you bored is a little baffling. After all, there are hundreds of different threads on this site for you to vist. Why do you insist on returning to the one that leaves you bored, and then be sufficiently audacious to complain about the same.

How condescending. Your superiority knows no bounds. This is an open forum that anyone can comment on. To accuse someone of being bold to complain about your thread is beyond the pale.I say to everyone on here please return as many times as you want and show this odious little man that his insults will not drive you away.I remember the offy at the bottom of Willows lane, if it was the home of the one and only how come no suggestions of a placard or statue?

garinda 29-03-2007 17:43

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404814)
Why do you insist on returning to the one that leaves you bored, and then be sufficiently audacious to complain about the same.

I'm just hoping that in amongst all the badly used, and flowery rhetoric, you may actually tell us something of interest....one day.

I'm an optimist.:)

shillelagh 29-03-2007 17:57

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
http://www.rossendale.gov.uk/site/sc...php?newsID=137

Why not borrow some of Rossendales?:D :D :D

Neil 29-03-2007 18:02

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 404843)
http://www.rossendale.gov.uk/site/sc...php?newsID=137

Why not borrow some of Rossendales?:D :D :D

Quote:

Rossendale's Councillors have been 'commended' for their commitment to Member Development. The Council recently entered the Member Development Achievement of the Year category of the annual Municipal Journal Awards. Although not winning the award, Councillors' efforts to improve and develop
Which method of development did they use? Vacuum pump? :rolleyes:

SPUGGIE J 29-03-2007 18:05

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh (Post 404843)
http://www.rossendale.gov.uk/site/sc...php?newsID=137

Why not borrow some of Rossendales?:D :D :D

Can we not just happen to "recruit em" permenantly and sack HBC ones?

lancsdave 29-03-2007 18:13

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 404804)
Do you not think you'd have got a better response to your thread if you'd have used better, clearer English?

Then we might know what the hell you're waffling on about.

I'm sure jimmyjim won't mind me quoting him;

"its a pity you cant read into whats being said as quick as you can come up with a respose...."

:yelrotflm

Gayle 29-03-2007 19:36

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404101)
Gayle,

Are you able to let me have your email address?. If so,I recall there is a facility that allows private messages on here, and thus you can place it there if you so wish.

I don't give out my email address to people that I don't know - however, I have sent you a pm.

Neil 29-03-2007 21:08

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 404897)
I don't give out my email address to people that I don't know - however, I have sent you a pm.

However being a person with low morals I could give you her email, home and mobile numbers along with address date of birth etc for a small fee :D :D :D

gondola 29-03-2007 21:26

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Gayle,

Thank you for that.

gondola 29-03-2007 21:30

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Bored Neil,

I am not interested in personal telephone numbers. After all, I am not seeking a date or some such. Nor I suspect is Gayle.

I am amazed that you continue to maintain an hawkish eye over this thread. It must leave you immensely bored.

Ianto.W. 29-03-2007 22:07

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I know im a bit thick and maybe a little senile , so I wiil try to put it into 'lancy' talk, why has 'father' and the rest of the licencing committee who voted for this issue, not gone down the Kazi?

Less 29-03-2007 22:23

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404930)
I am amazed that you continue to maintain an hawkish eye over this thread. It must leave you immensely bored.

I can't speak for Neil but I find the content to be boring but the attitude with which it is applied is absolutely fascinating.:)

Neil 29-03-2007 22:24

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404930)
I am not interested in personal telephone numbers. After all, I am not seeking a date or some such.

Sorry that was my poor attempt at humour.

Neil 29-03-2007 22:25

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 404944)
I can't speak for Neil but I find the content to be boring but the attitude with which it is applied is absolutely fascinating.:)

It's ok mate you speak for me. I keep getting slapped when I speak for myself :D

Less 29-03-2007 22:27

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 404946)
It's ok mate you speak for me. I keep getting slapped when I speak for myself :D

Tell me whose slapping you and we'll get them at playtime.:rolleyes:

Neil 29-03-2007 22:35

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I don't think gondola will turn up at playtime (Saturday night ;)) well if he/she does they wont introduce them self.

Less 29-03-2007 22:48

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 404948)
I don't think gondola will turn up at playtime (Saturday night ;)) well if he/she does they wont introduce them self.

Perhaps by then the Observer will have done a full expose on him and we'll finally find out who 'deep throat' really is?;)

gondola 29-03-2007 22:49

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Ianto,

I refer to your post (135). It is a question I have been asking myself. I note from the Accrington Observer today that Mr Britcliffe is astounded and appalled that Councillor Jones is raising the awareness of some issues at the time of the elections. Frankly, I cannot think of a better time for such issues to be raised. After all, it is about the only time such matters get taken seriously by political parties since they are keen to secure votes. What exactly does Mr Britcliffe want the voting public to be exposed to, if not issues that affect them directly?

Since Mr Britcliffe insists it is not good form to discuss such matters, I shall turn my attention to something entirely different. How about the merits of Mr Kazi as the next Mayor of Hyndburn, which I understand he is seeking to become.

Here is my view. I cannot think of a more appalling nomination. I jest not.

gondola 29-03-2007 22:54

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Neil,

You are right. I shall not be attending on Saturday. Perhaps because I shall be too busy detailing my personal life to the Observer for the 'expose'

gondola 29-03-2007 22:58

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Incidentally, I think Councillor Jones is conspicuous by his absence. I hope he has not received a slap on the wrists by the 'cleaners'?

Mancie 30-03-2007 04:55

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
The role of Mayor, the council leadership, and for that matter the whole council should be abolished and replaced by a “People's Protectorate”… this committee would have the power to bring to book anyone who’s actions are not deemed to be in line with the overall good of the people (what is deemed to be for the good of the people will be decided by the said committee).

At this juncture I humbly put myself forward as the Chairman of the People's Protectorate of Accrington. :)

steeljack 30-03-2007 06:11

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 404985)
The role of Mayor, the council leadership, and for that matter the whole council should be abolished and replaced by a “People's Protectorate”… this committee would have the power to bring to book anyone who’s actions are not deemed to be in line with the overall good of the people (what is deemed to be for the good of the people will be decided by the said committee).

At this juncture I humbly put myself forward as the Chairman of the People's Protectorate of Accrington. :)

:eek: :eek: :eek: , Mancie has been on the Stones Ginger wine (told you it was good stuff) and listening to Gilbert and Sullivan , can I apply for the position of Lord High Executioner (one lying thieving snivelling politician a week is all I ask) :cool: :cool: :cool:

claytonender 30-03-2007 07:04

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by steeljack (Post 404986)
:eek: :eek: :eek: , Mancie has been on the Stones Ginger wine (told you it was good stuff) and listening to Gilbert and Sullivan , can I apply for the position of Lord High Executioner (one lying thieving snivelling politician a week is all I ask) :cool: :cool: :cool:

Any ideas about who the first one politician to get the chop should be.

Neil 30-03-2007 08:21

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404954)
How about the merits of Mr Kazi as the next Mayor of Hyndburn, which I understand he is seeking to become.

I personally see the role of Mayor as unnecessary and quite frankly a waste of public money.

Maybe you or someone else could enlighten me as to the purpose and worth of having a Mayor.

Less 30-03-2007 08:50

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 405003)
I personally see the role of Mayor as unnecessary and quite frankly a waste of public money.

Maybe you or someone else could enlighten me as to the purpose and worth of having a Mayor.

So that we can block Broadway with a fairground ride and thus prevent the shopkeepers on there from making any profit, after all we don't want a thriving town centre do we? :rolleyes:

Gayle 30-03-2007 09:00

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 404930)
Bored Neil,

I am not interested in personal telephone numbers. After all, I am not seeking a date or some such. Nor I suspect is Gayle.

I am amazed that you continue to maintain an hawkish eye over this thread. It must leave you immensely bored.

Gondola, lighten up - Neil was joking and if you'd care to read any other threads you'll see that there is plenty of banter that flies around.

Less 30-03-2007 09:08

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 405010)
Gondola, lighten up - Neil was joking and if you'd care to read any other threads you'll see that there is plenty of banter that flies around.

He was Joking? Well I paid Neil a tenner for each number, is that why it's always on answerphone? Would I be able to get my money back even though I haven't got a receipt?:D

gondola 30-03-2007 09:11

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Mr Britcliffe does not consider the recent monstrous blunder by the Licensing Committee sufficiently important for it to be an election issue. However, for purposes of establishing a basis for comparative evaluation I submit below a link to the recent decision to expel a Headteacher who made a similar gaffe. At least in that case heads have rolled and rightly so, notwithstanding the fact that the offender never had any contact with children.

The reason for dismissal appears to have been the fact that procedures were not followed for whatever reason. A failure to do so may have led to potentially devastating consequences. So why can we not have the same outcome in this matter i.e those members that voted in favour be suspended from their duties until the investigation is completed. Further if it is found that they did not adhere to the rules, then they should be made to go.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/l...re/6506613.stm

Neil 30-03-2007 09:15

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405018)
Headteacher who made a similar gaffe. At least in that case heads have rolled

Heads that rolled, was that an attempt at humour? You may be normal after all. I was starting to think you were a Southerner :D

I take it you were waiting till Friday so you could post the outcome of that hearing.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405018)
The reason for dismissal appears to have been the fact that procedures were not followed for whatever reason. A failure to do so may have led to potentially devastating consequences. So why can we not have the same outcome in this matter i.e those members that voted in favour be suspended from their duties until the investigation is completed. Further if it is found that they did not adhere to the rules, then they should be made to go.

That is what should happen but with a couple of Tories that should go that will not happen will it?

Less 30-03-2007 09:22

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I'm beginning to think gondola is still on dial up, he nips in makes a post then logs out straight away, this thread must be costing him a fortune, so Working on the theory of how they treat our money, He could be a Councillor!:clown:

Neil 30-03-2007 09:24

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Maybe he logs out but still keeps an eye on the thread as a guest.

Unless all the guests watching this thread work at HBC :D

gondola 30-03-2007 09:25

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
''That is what should happen but with a couple of Tories that should go that will not happen will it?''

Well, in that case the voting public ought to make sure they take the matter into their own hands. The simplest way would be to make it known to their Ward candidate that they refuse to vote for him/her on the basis that their views are not considered appropriate in matters of importance. If others were to do the same, indubitably the political parties would have to take notice.

Gayle 30-03-2007 09:44

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 405015)
He was Joking? Well I paid Neil a tenner for each number, is that why it's always on answerphone? Would I be able to get my money back even though I haven't got a receipt?:D

Awww, you know I gave you my number ages ago! ;)

gondola 30-03-2007 09:44

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
So far as regards the view that the role of Mayor should be banished, I have no real view. However, on balance I think the Mayor can serve to act as an ambassador or some such for a Town, and if the person selected is credible can promote the interests of residents. This I am mildly of the view that the role ought to be continued, provided the person is of distinction in terms of service.

However, having someone like Kazi Siddique in such a position (I am reliably informed that he remains confident of being selected as the next Mayor) can only be an impediment to the interests of the residents of Hyndburn. Can anyone here point out to me what good, if any, Mr Siddique has done since being elected as Councillor? No, thought not.

Gayle 30-03-2007 09:50

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Well I don't know anything about Cllr Siddique but I do know that Cllr Rahman has been an excellent Mayor for Hyndburn. He is possibly one of the hardest working men I've ever met and he is also one of the nicest. He fulfills all his official duties with a wonderful smile on his face and his wife is elegant and gracious.

A Mayor can be an excellent asset to an area if they are a good Mayor. They can be ambassadors for the area both inside the area and outside it. If the Mayor attends a function it gives it a certain level of gravitas and support.

PS - if you invite the Mayor to attend your event the press usually comes along and takes a picture so you get extra publicity for your events. :D

Less 30-03-2007 09:54

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 405028)
Awww, you know I gave you my number ages ago! ;)

yes 118 118 it costs me a fortune each time I try to contact you!:mad:

gondola 30-03-2007 09:55

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I agree. Councillor Rahman has been a good Mayor. Of course, he combined such duties with his demanding role as a G.P. However, Mr Siddique, like many other councillors unfit for the role, does not have a job. Nor has he had one for the entire time he has been a Councillor I suspect. Thus he surely must have had more opportunity than Mr Rahman to contribute to Hyndburn. I ask again, what contribution has he made?

Thus, with little if any contribution, is it right that he be given the role of Mayor?

Less 30-03-2007 10:02

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 405021)
I'm beginning to think gondola is still on dial up, he nips in makes a post then logs out straight away, this thread must be costing him a fortune, so Working on the theory of how they treat our money, He could be a Councillor!:clown:

Hmm, not only could he be a councillor but a councillor that is upset by not being offered his rightful position of his Worship the mayor for yet another year!:D

Quote:

gondola= Thus he surely must have had more opportunity than Mr Rahman to contribute to Hyndburn. I ask again, what contribution has he made?

Thus, with little if any contribution, is it right that he be given the role of Mayor?

gondola 30-03-2007 10:07

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Gayle wrote: Well I don't know anything about Cllr Siddique

I am well aware that you are involved with many community groups in Hyndburn. I also note that Mr Siddique is the Portfolio holder for Community Cohesion. This I am staggered that you know nothing of him. Surely an integral part of his duty must be dealing with the community groups and the community in general.

Gayle 30-03-2007 11:02

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
You are quite right, I am a member of a number of community groups but at no point have I had any contact with Cllr Siddique - however, I doubt whether he'd want to join Hyndburn Women's Forum or be involved with a drama group.

I suppose the one you would imagine that he might get involved in would be the Mela and Community Festival - he has not attended any meetings of that, however, Cllr Brian Roberts has been a regular attendee so we have had council representation.

And, in all fairness to Brian, he has been a valuable member of the committee lately and has delivered when he's said he would.

gondola 30-03-2007 11:20

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle (Post 405055)
You are quite right, I am a member of a number of community groups but at no point have I had any contact with Cllr Siddique - however, I doubt whether he'd want to join Hyndburn Women's Forum or be involved with a drama group.

I suppose the one you would imagine that he might get involved in would be the Mela and Community Festival - he has not attended any meetings of that, however, Cllr Brian Roberts has been a regular attendee so we have had council representation.

And, in all fairness to Brian, he has been a valuable member of the committee lately and has delivered when he's said he would.

Well you seem to be reinforcing the view that his contributions to the community are negligible. Surely other Councillors need to vent these concerns to those that have afforded him the role of Portfolio holder for Community Cohesion. After all, if it is your view that he has failed to get involved at functions at which someone with his responsibility could make a positive impact then surely the role ought to go to someone with a more active interest in such matters.
Furthermore, I lift verbatim from the response by Mr Jones on the other thread a few days ago (which he later edited though I have saved). In it he stated that Mr Siddique does not speak much English. As portfolio holder for Community Cohesion part of his remit is to promote integration of different community groups. If he cannot speak English, then how can he achieve such a goal? Surely ‘community’ represents all the different strands of people in Hyndburn, and not just those loosely termed ‘Asian’.
I appreciate that such a role would require an appreciation of the culture of the Indian Sub-Continent. However, it also needs someone with the necessary skills set to engage the wider community. Perhaps most importantly, it requires someone with a tenacious attitude, something Mr Siddique clearly does not have.

Gayle 30-03-2007 11:32

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
No Gondola, I am simply saying that I have had little contact with him, but I also pointed out that it is unlikely that some of the groups that I am involved with would come under his remit.

As for the Mela committee - that is attended by a councillor who's remit (I think) is culture and leisure and therefore we would hardly expect to have two councillors turn up.

Less 30-03-2007 11:36

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405060)
(which he later edited though I have saved).


For what reason, other than to be able to produce such evidence in a court of law would you need to save any of the posts from accyweb? We are only having discussions.

I have said it before and I'll say it again,

I don't trust gondola and we all need to be very careful what we say to him.

His hidden agenda just might be slipping.
:eek:




accymel 30-03-2007 11:37

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I dont trust him either i smell a dodgey .... gondola:eek:

Ianto.W. 30-03-2007 11:39

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
If anyone is considered for selection to as you say be an ambassador for the Borough, it should be at least ascertained that they are able to chew gum and walk down the street in a straight line at the same time.

garinda 30-03-2007 11:43

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 405071)

I don't trust gondola and we all need to be very careful what we say to him.




I think I'm falling in love with him.

Less 30-03-2007 11:46

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 405077)
I think I'm falling in love with him.[/left]

Don't do that rindy it's coming up to my birthday soon have you forgotten that night of my earlier birthday, we could do it again!:drink::drink:

MargaretR 30-03-2007 11:46

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
This is better viewing than UTube

accymel 30-03-2007 11:48

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by [email protected] (Post 405080)
This is better viewing than UTube

:rofl38: true it has its entertainment & gondy is the jester:D

gondola 30-03-2007 11:49

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Ianto wrote: If anyone is considered for selection to as you say be an ambassador for the Borough, it should be at least ascertained that they are able to chew gum

I’m not sure chewing gum is his strength. It is rumoured to me that he has a few front teeth missing, though I am not able to confirm the same. Gayle stated this morning that the current Mayor has served his town with a smile. If it is the case that Siddique has a few teeth missing, a frown may be more appropriate than a smile when being photographed.

garinda 30-03-2007 11:50

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Garinda.

Gondola.

Both start with a G and end with an A, and share seven letters.

It's fate he came here.;)

gondola 30-03-2007 11:54

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Though one professes to favour the truth, the other seemingly seeks to suppress it.

Less 30-03-2007 11:57

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 405085)
Garinda.

Gondola.

Both start with a G and end with an A, and share seven letters.

It's fate he came here.;)

put them both together and you get:-

Gala on a odd ring

accymel 30-03-2007 11:58

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Truth:confused: more like a load of male genitailia!!

accymel 30-03-2007 11:59

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 405085)
Garinda.

Gondola.

Both start with a G and end with an A, and share seven letters.

It's fate he came here.;)

You'll have to arrange to meet at the DogInn:D

WillowTheWhisp 30-03-2007 11:59

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 405085)
Garinda.

Gondola.

Both start with a G and end with an A, and share seven letters.

It's fate he came here.;)


:D I'm beginning to worry about you.

Ianto.W. 30-03-2007 12:00

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405084)
Ianto wrote: If anyone is considered for selection to as you say be an ambassador for the Borough, it should be at least ascertained that they are able to chew gum

I’m not sure chewing gum is his strength. It is rumoured to me that he has a few front teeth missing, though I am not able to confirm the same. Gayle stated this morning that the current Mayor has served his town with a smile. If it is the case that Siddique has a few teeth missing, a frown may be more appropriate than a smile when being photographed.

In my reply I said anyone gondola, The current Mayor of this Borough has been a credit to it, as he is to his profession, and a true gentleman.

WillowTheWhisp 30-03-2007 12:03

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Less (Post 405090)
put them both together and you get:-

Gala on a odd ring

You get something else too but I'm far too ladylike to say a thing like that. :eek:

accymel 30-03-2007 12:05

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
I'd like to know as well as others have pointed out is why gondy seems to go offline as soon as he posts then comes back again with a reply - does that assume he has to revert to his handbook on the next nonsencial reply or he has a very poor net connection :confused:

Less 30-03-2007 12:06

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 405100)
You get something else too but I'm far too ladylike to say a thing like that. :eek:

P.M. Me, I'll put it on for you. :D (and no-one will know it was you).

MargaretR 30-03-2007 12:06

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Suspect this thread is a build up to April 1st

gondola 30-03-2007 12:07

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Ianto,

Quite. The current Mayor has been a tremendous asset to Hyndburn. If Siddique is selected as the next Mayor then I can state in advance that he would be nothing save a liabilty.

accymel 30-03-2007 12:09

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405105)
Ianto,

Quite. The current Mayor has been a tremendous asset to Hyndburn. If Siddique is selected as the next Mayor then I can state in advance that he would be nothing save a liabilty.

Did u get that from a book notice u go off no soon as u post:confused:

Less 30-03-2007 12:09

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
A darling! O, 'n' a dog.;)

WillowTheWhisp 30-03-2007 12:13

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 405108)
Did u get that from a book notice u go off no soon as u post:confused:

It's no good Mel, he's gone again. :D

accymel 30-03-2007 12:16

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 405111)
It's no good Mel, he's gone again. :D

:rofl38: probably off to research an answer for me that makes no sence lol:D

accymel 30-03-2007 12:17

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by WillowTheWhisp (Post 405100)
You get something else too but I'm far too ladylike to say a thing like that. :eek:

Well DOG INN comes out of the pair LOL!!!!!!!:D

WillowTheWhisp 30-03-2007 12:35

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 405113)
Well DOG INN comes out of the pair LOL!!!!!!!:D


Less posted it but I can't imagine where he got it from ;)

gondola 30-03-2007 12:46

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Those that have concerns about the conduct or insouciance of some councillors ought to present their case in writing prior to the AGM on the 17th of May at the Council Chambers. They should propose that it be admitted as a formal reslution, though I suspect this would not be allowed. Additionally they should do the same for thye meeting on the 19th of May.

Another way to make known frustrations is prior to the AGM, by casting your vote at the elections.

Gayle 30-03-2007 12:51

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405131)
Those that have concerns about the conduct or insouciance of some councillors ought to present their case in writing prior to the AGM on the 17th of May at the Council Chambers. They should propose that it be admitted as a formal reslution, though I suspect this would not be allowed. Additionally they should do the same for thye meeting on the 19th of May.

Another way to make known frustrations is prior to the AGM, by casting your vote at the elections.

You clearly have concerns - will you be making a formal complaint?

lancsdave 30-03-2007 12:53

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel (Post 405101)
I'd like to know as well as others have pointed out is why gondy seems to go offline as soon as he posts then comes back again with a reply - does that assume he has to revert to his handbook on the next nonsencial reply or he has a very poor net connection :confused:

Perhaps you can't log in under 2 usernames at the same time. :rolleyes: :D

Gayle 30-03-2007 12:55

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Hopefully the mods have checked that.

gondola 30-03-2007 12:57

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
For the avoidance of doubt, I have only one identity. I see no reason to adopt another.

Neil 30-03-2007 12:58

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 405138)
Perhaps you can't log in under 2 usernames at the same time. :rolleyes: :D

Yes you can, just use Firefox for one and Internet Explorer for the other. Or use more than one PC.
Oops did I say that aloud? :D :rolleyes:

accymel 30-03-2007 13:09

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 405153)
I wonder how long this post will last?

He does go offline straight after posting ;)

Erm yes virtually straightaway - just watch shhhhh:D

accymel 30-03-2007 13:10

Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gondola (Post 405147)
For the avoidance of doubt, I have only one identity. I see no reason to adopt another.

Gee took your time just with that reply - was that the best u could say in longwinded sence:confused:


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:28.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com