![]() |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
A question for Councillor Jones. He asserted that Mr Safdar’s affiliation to the Conservative Party was only known the day before the recent internal election. Yet this from the Observer yesterday:
‘’And Conservative candidate Mohammed Safdar, who is standing in Church, was a lifelong member of the Labour Party until around six months ago’’ Yes Councillors Jones, it states six months ago. Not the day before the internal election. Care to offer an explanation or was the Labour Party really going to impose a candidate on the people of Central Ward that was with the Conservatives many months earlier?. Either Councillor Jones is wrong or the Observer have got it wrong yet again. Which is it my dear chap? If the latter, can you ask the Editor to amend it. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I think it imperative that I write to the Editor of the Observer (or have someone write on my behalf) requesting clarification of this issue, mindful of the comments made by Councillor Jones on this forum. I shall request that it be included in the letters section, since it is only right and proper that readers be exposed to the actual facts surrounding the election process before committing themselves to voting for a particular candidate.
Councillor Jones has given a version of events here, but the Observer continue to report something that is in stark contrast to this |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I look forward to seeing your letter in the Obs Gondola.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Am i right or am i right:D |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Gee i think Gondola thinks he's in the house of Commons already play acting Prime Mnisters Questions - BADLY & to ONESELF heheheheheehe
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Well, everything is on track so far as regards releasing information into the public domain. There are several others from this forum and elsewhere who are equally dedicated to ensuring the facts go public before the elections in May.
Readers on here may seek to reject the claims for now. But when the facts change, change with them. . The elections may take an unexpected twist or two. It reminds me of some Shakespearean verse; Oft expectations fail, And most oft there, where most they promise not to, And oft they hit, Where hope is coldest and despair most fits. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Some more from the Observer:
Labour leader Councillor Jones sais: ‘’It just goes to show that ministers do care about places like Hyndburn and are very interested in what’s going on’’ If only such interest permeated through the minds of the Councillors of Hyndburn, save one or two like Councillor Pritchard. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Gondola i take it you want to win the Hyndburn seat in this years elections yourself - thought so & you are prepared to go to any lengths like the paparazzi in order to do it - thought so. You are not prepared to let the voting public know YOUR intentions in improving Hyndburn except dissing down your contenders 1st without your own purpose being discussed - thought so!
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Quote:
Don't draw it out, if you know something and can prove it then either tell us or if it is illegal inform the authorities. Otherwise take you dross elsewhere. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I see the Community Development Fund has allocated funding to the ‘Why I Live Here’ project.
I wonder if Gayle would care to disclose the amount allocated to this project, and exactly what is hoped to be achieved from such an investment. Another way to put it is this using a hypothetical scenario- if the Community Development fund was Gayle’s own hard earned money which had to be dedicated to developing Hyndburn, would she have considered the ‘Why I Live Here’ project as the most suitable investment for such a purpose? Not rejecting the idea, simply wishing to find out more |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
A question I ask myself every day. Should I get paid for it ? |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Like Willow, I initially thought that Gondola would be good for the forum, but I find it very hard to respect,or even take seriously, a man who seems to hold most of the members in contempt....and who seems to think he is vastly superior in intellect. Someone who poses questions and then does not let anyone on the forum have a chance to respond, instead answering them in the way that HE thinks fit.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Personally, I think Gondola should pay a visit to the fish market and buy himself a piece of fresh fish......it will go nicely with the chips he seems to have on both shoulders.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Do you? You obviously do. Thought so.:) (I'm with Less, this new fashion for answering yout own question is cool.) |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
I'm catching on too Less, it works a treat doesn't it? You get far more sensible responses that way. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I thought political scandles were supposed to be entertaining. This has not thus far been achieved :(
I don't even know whats going on. :/ |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
"Deep thought" gondola are you gonna tell this slobbering panting mob anything they don't already suspect.. and I say suspect because every single word you type is all common gossip.. these people are born and bred in Accrington! for gods sake don't confuse em even more... if whippet has got 3 legs .. tell em!
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
:eek: & heres me thinking the EU have abolished flat cap wearing for the mo then:D |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
The thing is Ianto, you have to read all the posts to see if they do actually contain anything of any value to the thread.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
So u know nothing about the 3 legged whippets that could be the BIG CLAIM soon to be officially announced then:D |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
and unfortunately (or fortunately -depending on your views) sometimes a touch of levity finds its way in........and that happens in most threads that have serious content...and to be honest I don't think it detracts. It would be very sad to bar people from a thread on a serious subject just because they held a 'lighter' view of the situation.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
PS at my expence.;) |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
I don't know why you keep defending him. Everything he posts, and doesn't say, is about as cryptic as a crossword puzzle in the Beano. Empty rhetoric. Innuendo. Gossip. Hearsay. Blah, blah, blah. Yada, yada, yada. Yawwwwwwwwwwwwwwn. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
My good friend garinda, all will be revealed, but not on accyweb as this is a family friendly forum, started I believe by Roy who I personally would not seek to see harmed. When the time comes ,and I mighn't add the sooner the better, I will personally advise all interested parties, then you can draw your own conclusions. I have only been a member of this forum for a short while and can understand the frustrations with the lack or credible evidence to suuport the inuendoes, all I ask for is a little patience.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Tedious isn't the word. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
If the information is correct then how the heck does it harm Roy? If it's lies then it shouldn't be even hinted at on here or anywhere else.
The flat caps and whippets post is at least intelligible which is more than can be said for the smoke and mirrors twaddle, isn't it? Yes, thought so. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
How on earth is his postings here looking for direction? Particularly because he hasn't got the balls to go public with whatever it is, he claims to know. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
What man was looking for directions? Gondola? He isn't so much looking for directions as doing his best to get the rest of us lost. It really irritates me when people hint at secret information and then do the 'If you don't know it's not my place to tell you.' or 'If you don't know then you obviously don't care as much as I do.' bit. If there's something worth saying why doesn't he just come out and say it?
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Reminds me a little of that member Jimmyjim, who joined here after writing a letter in the Observer, and started a thread called 'Our Town', which promised grandiose changes in the way we were going to live our lives, but which petered out to nothing. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Maybe he's the 'several other members' that Gondola was referring to. ;)
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
iantow, gondola and jimmyjim possible all the same person?:eek:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
I don't tell lies, I may get things wrong, see things form a different angle but I don't tell deliberate lies. I have more interests and friends outside of politics to want to be tarnished with that brush. Politics is only a small (but at the moment significant) part of my life. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
I whole heartedly agree, the sooner the better, but again I ask if he is not going to reveal it on accyweb why is he wasting our time? Why are you going to advise and how are you going to choose who is an 'interested party?', Why not Gondola? Patience like money is a rare commodity and I for one get annoyed when someone wastes mine unnecessarily, if you are 'the friend' that he pretends to have on accyweb and he has revealed all to you, then good luck to you, for the rest of us he is totally wasting space on a server, (which has to be paid for), that could be used by the rest of us for something far more entertaining and far less irritating than this.:mad: Am I right? Who cares? I just want this tic to go away, it's like a zit that hasn't got a head, it can't think but it is a pain, of course I'm right!:D |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
The cyncial would also add, and probably with some truth, that Hyndburn is a marginal Council and that's whay they were here, but it is not always the case because ministers do go to places that are safe Tory or Labour as well. Gondola is either a Tory, or an outsider. You sem very sharply focused on media led issues but if you where on the inside you would be picking away at much bigger issues (that are wrong) that rarely come across in the press. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
There is no doubt that the visit by Reid is entirely based on the fact that this is a marginal Council. I suspect it shall not be for much longer since it is inevitable that Siddique shall not be successful going forward and this may be sufficient to swing it in favour of Labour.
You appear to suggest that there are issues which are not portrayed in the press, and about which I have little understanding. I think you are well wide of the mark. Much of what I am seeking to report is not available in the public domain, though it clearly should be. Perhaps if you had cared to ask Councillor Battle as I had suggested in relation to which Councillors had resigned their positions then you may have appreciated there are many skeletons in the cupboard. Maybe ask David Myles. He too knows of a few scandals. Have any of these reported the same into the public domain? No, thought not. The idea that I may be a Conservative is utter nonsense since I have clearly not granted gracious summaries to either Safdar or Siddique. In fact I have asserted that Safdar would be a disservice to the Church Ward were he to be elected. I think the chances of him being elected are remote. Thank goodness for that. Let us hope that in the forthcoming elections there is not the alleged scandal of fiddling the returning officer. I seem to recall that in previous elections former Councillor Sardar Ali accused Councillor Allah Dad of the same. I ought to point out that following a police investigation no charges followed. Now they appear to be rather good friends. Incidentally, since the name of Sardar has reared it’s head, perhaps Councillor Jones can explain how it is that whilst Sardar was a Councillor, his house on Blackburn Road of Accrington was given a Buildings renovation grant on several occasions. I am advised that the property is in very robust condition, and such was the case even after the first renovation. Surely those allocating such funds could have found other properties in Hyndburn that would have gained benefit from such an improvement , rather than ensuring the same property did benefit several times. I suspect the cost would have run into tens of thousand’s of pounds. Perhaps there may have been good reason for ensuring this property received such renovation grants, but to the ‘outsider’ it almost appears to be a case of preferential bias. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Siddique is seeking to be the next Mayor of Hyndburn. That would make a mockery of the very idea of having a Mayor to both serve and promote the interests of Hyndburn. Thus the fact that he may fail at the elections can be considered as killing two birds with one stone.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
However the outcome of the elections may change things. 'Rumour' has it that Jean Lockwood has been promised it, Kazi has ben promised it and Tony Dobson has been promised it by PB. The last 'unfortunate' resignation I can think of was Deakin which was before my time. Of course there has been Anne Scaife and Wyn Frankland since. Anne because she moved and Wyn openly condemned her Party as the reason for going. There are always allegations about Councillors 'outside' activities but you don't expect me to comment without fact do you Gondola? You won't catch me out Gondola no matter how hard you try as I tell what I believe to be the truth. I may be wrong or see things completely different, but that is a long way from deliberate deceitfulness. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
mind-LESS,
You wrote ''Patience like money is a rare commodity and I for one get annoyed when someone wastes mine unnecessarily'' In that case do not bother reading this thread. Why are you seeking to annoy yourself when you could be enjoyong the sunshine. Let me answer that. Perhaps due to the fact that you enjoy this thread. I on the other hand would find anything set up by you rather boring. Hence why I have never bothered to to check. Incidentally, it is readily obvious that Ianto is one of the others who has access to similar information as I. Thus he insists it is not dross. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
...and the grants. It is the first I know of what you say. We are in opposition and it is not possible with the volume of decisions to check it all in detail. I will investigate. What number Blackburn Rd?
If you are saying many suspicious decisions are made then I agree. The Council is morally corrupt. What do you want me to do about it? I raise every issue but then you get the blue rinse brigade (masquerading as Joe Public) shouting 'work together' because they don't like faults being pointed out. I think I have raised all the major issues as best I can. In the end - we the public - put this lot there and - we the public - can remove them but fail to do so every year. I can't do anything at all about that. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
You, I think only care about you and your very simplistic attempts at being the centre of attention. If as Ianto has stated you will not be revealing any of your insider knowledge on site then get yourself off to a tap room somewhere and leave us in peace. :rofl38: |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Thank you for your comments. I agree that any mayor, or indeed Councillor should have a grasp of the English language. Otherwise he would not be in a position to serve those in his ward that are only fluent in English. The need for such a command of language is even greater due to the fact that he is Portfolio holder for Community Cohesion. How on earth can he even begin to integrate different communities when he does not speak the language of the majority. It is an absolute nonsense. I appreciate that it is not your remit to decide who serves in such posts, but if you felt sufficiently'interested' then surely you ought to have raised this issue before now and in a forum other than here. Perhaps a notice prior to the AGM's would have been appropriate with the backing of other councillors. You are right that I don't expect you to comment on the activities of Councillors without evidence. Such a thesis would be absurd. But that is my very point. Councillor Jean Batlle and Myles have the evidence in relation to Siddique. they have simply not done anything about it. That is all set to change. Ask them - will you then be able to tell me I am wrong? No, thought not. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Mr Jones,
I know not the number off hand, save that it is an end terrace. I shall phone my source later today to obtain the same. I am sure that since former Councillor Sardar Ali had his details on the Councillors lists from a few years ago, you too would be able to get the number. But these are trivial issues in relative terms. The conduct of others is a far more disgraceful affair. I shall consult others who have this information later today and see if it is possible to disclose it to you now. If so, I shall let you have it in the next day or two. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
:cool: |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
http://www.barcelonatours.net/subSec...ballmen001.jpg |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I know this is ancient history now but can anyone enlighten me as to what occurred with councellor Deakin?
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
reading this thread with amazement ........how can someone (if its true) be elected to public office if they don't speak English, have English politics become so corrupt that voting districts/boundaries are gerrymandered to suit various ethnic populations ?
:confused: :confused: |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I doubt that gerrymandeing needs to come into it. There are some wards where people who have English as a first language are in the minority.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
That's another good point mthead.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
:D Nice one :D :D :D
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=26113 so quite happy to disclose the amount as it was published in the Accrington Observer at the back end of last year and also published on here. No secrets. The results of this project are an exhibition (at the Haworth Art Gallery in July) of the photos taken, a DVD of the interviews, a book and an event. The artist/interviewers and photographers visited 50 people from all different faith backgrounds (it was important that we spoke to minority faiths and atheists as well as what could be considered more mainstream faiths). Their views were then collated and the text for the book written, what struck the artist/interviewer was that despite different cultural backgrounds we all have the same fears, dreams, goals etc. He created a text that was the sound of all the voices singing in unison (sounds a bit arty farty so apologise for that one but at the end of the day it's an arts project, the exhibition and dvd are far more conventional). In answer to the questions 'what will all this achieve' - well, apart from all the people that came to the event from various public bodies the Chief Exec of Hyndburn heard about this project before the event and requested a stack of invitations for Councillors and officers to attend the event - some did. Thus, the views of the people who participated were (and will be as the information gets circulated) heard by the right people, people who's job it is to be interested in this subject matter. However, that wasn't the sole purpose, that was just an additional benefit. The purpose was to get people, who are not normally involved with this type of project, together in a project/room to see that people have more similarities than differences. It was a really positive experience. The results of the project can be used as a promotion for this area as the majority of things that people said were positive. As for the money, well yes, it's easy to say that it's a waste of money because it is a lot of money but I would definitely argue that it's not a waste (well of course, I'd argue that because my job depends on it :D ). From a personal perspective I believe that Hyndburn should get a slice of every pie that's going. Hyndburn has just managed to haul itself out of the bottom 50 most deprived areas in the country which sounds good but in fact means that the area will now lose out on a huge amount of additional funding. By applying and often getting this type of funding it means that the area benefits in more ways than one - you have to consider how the money is actually spent to see the real benefit. Some people imagine that the money, once allocated, disappears into a black hole, but it actually goes into the local economy. Wherever possible I use local people for these things - obviously it's not always possible so sometimes they come from other areas of East Lancashire - it is very rare that I use someone from outside East Lancashire. So take for example the money spent on the entertainment at the event - two local musicians - they got £150 between them to perform. They will then do their shopping at a local shop, perhaps buy a pub in the local pub and then perhaps buy a shirt off the market - the pub that they spend the money in the benefits because they are able to pay the wages of another local person and so on and so on as the money circulates - who knows but the odds are that the majority of that money will be spent with the area which means that Hyndburn in general has benefit from the additional funding beyond the life of the project. That's just a small example so multiply that up to the majority of the spend for the project, plus the other £100k that I've brought into the area over the last year or so - when it comes into the area, it's not just for the project it's for the benefit of the whole area. So finally, yes my job does depend on this so quite rightly I defend it - however, I do appreciate that some people don't always see the benefit or purpose of the projects because they only see a small part of the overall effect. I will not stop trying to bring money into this area and I don't expect everyone to like everything I do. As for another point you keep bringing up Gondola about the Olympics - can you say how they are going to benefit Hyndburn? As far as I can see they are going to reduce the amount of funding that is available for this area and whether you agree with my projects, or anyone elses for that matter, surely you can see that it is better to get the money into Hyndburn rather than spend billions on a massive advertising stunt for London. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Gayle,
Thank you for that. I perused the first page of the link attached but did not feel the need to scroll the rest. I gather from this page that the amount allocated to this project was £12000. You suggest that this project served the purpose of connecting communities amongst other things. This is what the BME suggest, and so too do numerous other organisations set up for the same. All seem to gain funding for more or less the same reasons. Thus I would have expected that they would have made tangible progress in this regard by now. Let us look at the facts. Unfortunately, the BNP are seeking to enter Hyndburn in political terms since they feel they have had sufficient support from residents of Hyndburn in their campaigns elsewhere. Thus there is a growing number of residents in Hyndburn who are obviously disgruntled and are using the protest vote. We also have to consider the rising racial tensions between rival race gangs as reported in the Observer the other week (teens clash or similar). I do not seem to recall these tensions being as significant when there was little in terms of community cohesion projects years ago. This is not to suggest that such projects are the cause, but to consider the real possibility that these projects are doing little to offset the rising disharmony. Social dynamics may have changed and thus this may be a contributing factor to increased tension, but community projects in their current form do not seem to be the way forward. I have often repeated on these threads that it is a desire to integrate, from all segments of societies that will drive any change. Not DVD’s about why we enjoy living here. If people want to gain an insight to different cultures, then why does the ‘asian’ neighbour not have a cup of tea with the ‘white’ neighbour on a summers day in the back garden. Surely this would dispel a few myths, raise awareness of the different cultures and cost nothing. Or the idea I proposed the other day about bringing youngsters of different cultures together for a game of football in the park using mixed teams. Little cost, but substantial impact. You write that ‘’surely you can see that it is better to get the money into Hyndburn rather than spend billions on a massive advertising stunt for London.’’ No, I simply cannot see the justification for squandering money on the basis that if it does not go to Hyndburn it will go elsewhere. The Olympics is a story that is an inspiration to budding sportsmen and women throughout the country including Hyndburn, a project that is set to transform an entire area, a project that will drive tourism to that area, a project that will create employment for those that wish to better their lives, a project that shall be a landmark site for Great Britain and be talked about for years to come. I am sorry Gayle, but the same simply cannot be said about the ‘Why I Live Here’ project. I can think of far better ways to spend £12000 to benefit the people of Hyndburn. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Incidentally, I also note from your link that Ianto complained about not having received a renovations grant from the Council notwithstanding twenty years of effort. Perhaps Ianto ought to direct his frustration to Councillor Jones who agreed to investigate the same, mindful of the fact that former Councillor Sardar has had his property renovated several times by the award of a similar grant which included an extension and creating loft/attic rooms and the rest, all funded by the taxpayer.
The idea of preferential bias cannot be proved here (nor can it be established that it even exists) but unless it is dismissed by a reasoanble explanation then it may leave cynics speculating. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Well I cannot see how someone cannot understand that if a project is not generating the desired outcomes, then the money ought to be channelled elsewhere.
Which brings me to my previous assertion - that you cannot make someone understand something, when their job depends on not understanding it. By the way, I gave you a few examples of set ups which were simply a farce. Do you have the courage to state the same and ensure that they do not get funding for the same purpose going forward, or shall you just turn a blind eye and suggest that at least it was given to an organisation in Hyndburn and thus that makes it worthwhile. Finally, is it the case that fund raisers for 'community projects' and those on similar committees such as yourself, are incentivised on the basis that the person securing the funding gets 'x' per cent in addition to their salary? If so, then such persons clearly have a vested interest in ensuring the money is retained in Hyndburn rather than going to more plausible concerns elsewhere. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I have always been extremely open about the work that I do. I can not answer for other people or other community groups, so again, if you have specifics tell me and I'll look into it for you. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Excuse me, but I thought this thread was supposed to be about:-
Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose? If you want a get at Gayle and her work thread there are plenty on site that you can join in without such a large wander as this! :confused: |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Less clearly has failed to realise that many of the 'community cohesion' projects or organisations that operate as community or cultural centres, actually have councillors or potential councillors that are on the management committees or as employees.
Thus the issue is germane to this thread. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
I can state catagorically, that no one on any of the community groups that I work for actually benefits financially from them in any way shape or form (apart from where I stated earlier on). And as for having councillors on the committee then yes, some community groups that I'm involved with do have councillors on them but they don't personally make any profit from being on the group. Cllr Brian Roberts also sits on the Hyndburn Mela committee but does not finanacially benefit in any way - however, it is beneficial to the group to have a Councillor sitting on the committee. In all fairness to Brian he has been very helpful in advising the group and in finding out information that we needed to know. Again, I can not speak for groups with which I am not involved - I would like facts before commenting on them. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
No it isn't 'germane' to this thread, the thread is:- Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose? Not:- Is Gayle in on this somehow? |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Graham, do you really think the likes of Harriet Harman and John Reid are genuinely interested Hyndburn? Are you just very gullible or are you attempting to pull the wool over the electorate's eyes? |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
John Reid was candid. That was my view. I didn't see you there but just in case I missed you hiding in the cupboard, could you tell me which words of Dr Reid's you disagreed with in 50 Abbey Street? |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I don't know about anyone else but thanks to this, 'I will reveal all the dirty goings on to do with our Councillors thread', which has been going on for over a fortnight, there is not a paper shredder to be purchased anywhere within the Hyndburn boundary, why?
The reason why is quite obvious, everyone from the top to the bottom at the council be they guilty of multi-million pound frauds or whether they just 'borrowed' a biro has been working deep into the night making sure that if the spit hits the fan there will not be a paper trail leading back to them. But on the good side of this, all this over-time will have been voluntary, so gondola has managed to get rid of a very large paper mountain without a penny of it going on the Council Tax, for that reason if not for the fact that his almost 'witty remarks', have kept me entertained for all this time, i would like to nominate gondola as accywebs very own, 'Superhero' http://www.virtualbeargram.com/images/superhero.jpg |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
And yes, you're right I wasn't in the cupboard - I've better things to do with my time than listen to the weasel words of a third-rate politician grubbing for votes. Why, did I miss anything? |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Wynonie will stop it I spilt my tea reading your reply to 'junior Jones', he along with his vote catching mate should be on candid camera, I suggest a visit to 'specsavers 'is in order, the rose tinted variety.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
I'm sure the Socialist Worker's Party will be very pleased to have you on board.:D |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Maybe someone can tell me which candidate for election on May 3 has had their nomination papers signed by another Councillor, who claims to be of an Independent persuasion. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
Well I'm glad that I don't seem to be a 'reasonable' chap, we don't need a secret society associated with accyweb. :mad: |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
But alas, I'm still unenlightened.:D |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
Quote:
You can espouse your blue case, I don't mind that, but don't have more front than Blackpool and try to hide it. You make me laugh. |
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
You say it like being a Tory is a bad thing. Regardless of if he is or not, theres a wide spectrum of views on the Conservative party as with every other party, so trying to say hes tory because he disagrees with certain Labour policy isnt quite right..
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
I'm sure Wynonnie will speak for himself, but from reading his past posts he's a disillusioned ex-Labour supporter, not a Tory.
|
Re: Councillors in Hyndburn - Are they fit for purpose?
What needs to addressed are the changes to the workings of the commitees within HBC, which PD has implemented. Does anyone know how to get into the complete minutes of full council meetings and cabinet meetings.
Also, I think it might be possible to send a letter to the Mayor, to be read out before a council meeting stating what you are questoning about the correct runiing of HBC by the current controlling group. The controlling group (PB - the dicator and his co-horts), only have a majority of 1, there are currently 16 Labour Councillors, 18 Conservative Councillors and 1 Indpendent (who is so Independent that he has signed the nomination papers of a Conservative Candidate). It makes one wonder how they would behave if they had an overwhelming majority. The next full council meeting is April 24th |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:28. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com