Originally Posted by garinda (Post 652813)

I nearly choked on my Ovaltine tonight, when on the television news one of the members of the B.N.P. bleated on that what had happened was akin to living in a fascist state.

Priceless.

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 652834)

What I find disturbing was that 2 of our local ones live in remote locations and could be pinpointed precicely - hope this doesn't lead to lynch mob action

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 652843)

The list contains full names and addresses, right down to door number.

Originally Posted by Mancie (Post 652675)

I do know.. or did know ....that some "active" racist people..maybe not even registered members of the BNP had names, addresses, of people they regarded as the enemy on data base computers that could be passed around... I doubt if it's simply a BNP issue..to be frank the inside of the BNP IRA UDA and any Muslim extremist groups that advocate violence for thier aims should be banned by law... and those who may say the BNP do not advocate violence are at the best naive..at the worst mentally criminal.

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 652851)

i myself knew quite a few of the Combat 18, n Intercity Firm guys who were members way back.

Originally Posted by K-P (Post 652856)

surely the ice cream firm where NF

I still carry my millwall brick most days of the week :)

Originally Posted by BERNADETTE (Post 652848)

Do you agree with it being published on the web? And if you do would you like your name and address made available to everybody for being a member of the Conservative party? Seems wrong to me that it is fair play for one parties members names and addresses to be made public. Could lead to all sorts of things happening.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 652861)

Nope I don't agree with it being published. A disagreement of views should not give legitimacy to publishing of names/addresses. There are many safety implications associated with this too, not just the question of was it 'right or wrong'.

Originally Posted by andrewb (Post 652861)

Nope I don't agree with it being published. A disagreement of views should not give legitimacy to publishing of names/addresses. There are many safety implications associated with this too, not just the question of was it 'right or wrong'.