Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 848503)

To be quite honest If I were you I'd get a life;)

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 848354)

The use of the list is to show people like you that I wasn't saying anything wrong, and that our esteemed council leader, Mr Britcliife, claimed the expenses I indicated he had.

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 848475)

Surely, as a Mod, you should be reading all posts to check suitability??

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 848524)

I've got one thanks...hounding Tories and there inept policies. :p
(even though most of them wont respond to any questions)

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 848625)

I do which is why I reminded you this thread has gone off topic

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 848814)

So why and how did the potentially libellous post get through then? Both the publisher (Accy Web) and the writer would have been subject to litigation if I had not asked for it to be removed.

Originally Posted by accysimon (Post 848814)

So why and how did the potentially libellous post get through then? Both the publisher (Accy Web) and the writer would have been subject to litigation if I had not asked for it to be removed.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 848821)

As recently stated elsewhere, moderation on here is done retrospectively.

The mods don't sit here 24/7, checking every single post straight away, as I believe quite a few of them have lives to live away from this forum.

They trust members to act all grown up, and report posts that have broken forum rules.

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 848823)

seems the records stuck, it don't seem to sunk in, garinda has explained nicely to ya, if it dont sink in this time yer thick.:rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 845093)

It has come to my attention today that Cllrs Britcliffe and Haworth are rather upset at my posts on Accrington Web, with particular reference to those within the past 24 hours. I would therefore invite Cllr Britcliffe to come and join in the debates and balance out the arguments. I suspect it would make things much more interesting for readers of this forum and be a good opportunity to converse in a modern, pro-active way with the electorate.

Either you or one of your associates are reading Accrington Web postings on a regular basis so why not take part in the game rather than watch from the sidelines?

I for one would welcome the different viewpoint and the opportunity to debate regularly with the man who makes the policies for Hyndburn.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 951589)

Shouldn't we be extending the same invitation to the new leader of the council, Miles Parkinson?

Come on Miles, it's good to talk.

;)

Originally Posted by Ken Moss (Post 845093)

I would therefore invite Cllr Britcliffe to come and join in the debates and balance out the arguments. I suspect it would make things much more interesting for readers of this forum and be a good opportunity to converse in a modern, pro-active way with the electorate.

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 951616)

I agree. Same applies to you, Ken.

Maybe you'll answer my Kashmir question now, seeing as how you are Chair of O&S.

Originally Posted by gynn (Post 951616)

I agree. Same applies to you, Ken.

Maybe you'll answer my Kashmir question now, seeing as how you are Chair of O&S.

Originally Posted by garinda (Post 951623)

They do say what's good for the goose, is good for the gander.

It would be hypocritical not to demand answers to questions, just because the control of the council has happened to have changed.

Openess, and transparency make for a happy, democratic borough.