![]() |
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
That is where the NHS get it wrong........they don't take the credit card details of anyone who is thought to be liable to pay......by the time they are found liable for a whacking bill, they have had it away on their toes.....and it costs more to chase the debt that is profitable.
Or maybe things have changed in the last ten years? |
Re: The Tories
I think John was trying to draw an analogy to what happens in the USA to stop people taking advantage of health facilities, without paying, Cashy.
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
Ah....Cashy yer a wicked fella :D
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
Income- £452. This includes £432 from the state,£20 from his stall. Outgoings-£590. Before food etc., That's a deficit of £138 a month. With this £138 he is short of he plays poker and places the odd bet. Perhaps a man who can manage money that well can afford the odd drink as well. So if he can manage on -£34.5/week why is he asking if IDS could manage on +£53 a week- that should be easy. Bennett for Chancellor! |
Re: The Tories
Quote:
By the way, if you are so down on the US health care system, why are you supporting a party that wants to use it as a model for health care in Britain:confused: |
Re: The Tories
Quote:
I know that tax loopholes are legal ... but so was war profiteering in WWl ... but they are wrong, immoral, and they damn welll stink. One thing that I treasure about my Lancashire heritage is that I come from a place and a time (I know, I'm an old fart:theband:) where folks knew right from wrong, whatever the legal niceities. And what the tories are doing is wrong ... it sucks major league. |
Re: The Tories
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
The big corporations are greedy, and do not want to pay their share...if they did pay their share - again it would benefit those who need the helping hand. I suppose it shows that I am from the same BOB(Batty Old Bird) Lancashire background, with a strong sense of what is right and what isn't. |
Re: The Tories
Quote:
|
Re: The Tories
Quote:
Quote:
But you are left with the question- why did they not re-employ a team of lads they knew and bring in Poles? Yes, maybe the Poles would work for less but again maybe they thought the Poles would work harder, be more reliable. We don't know. After mentioning Frank Fields yesterday I spent some time reading up on him. One of his comments was that of the 400,000 new jobs created in the first year of the ConDems, 320,000 went to immigrents. 87% ! On average in the final Labour years 80% of all new jobs went to immigrants. The many companies that employed 400,000 people can't have all been like Express Gifts. They can't all have been lousy employers offering lousy jobs. What do they see wrong with our huge pool of available labour? Why favour immigrants? Or did they not have much choice? It can't just be pay levels. We have to ask why our unemployed don't get all or most of these jobs. Are they brought up with bad attitude? Are they badly educated by a failing system? Has the moral fibre of this country rotted away? Is our welfare system too generous? Are they not interested? We need to find out what's wrong. If we don't we'll end up with millions more immigrants working( but overwhelming our NHS,schools and housing) and starting to ask, as a massive pressure group, 'Why are we all working our butts off to keep all these UK locals at home? What's being done about it?' Then the fun could start! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com