Craig Ian Hall Independent - Page 4

cashman · 29-04-2010, 18:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Yes, in Hyndburn against Graham Jones and Karen Buckley.

The man has guts, I'll give him that.

Oh i agree fully hes got guts, just brain cells seems n acute shortage.

Less · 29-04-2010, 18:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Yes, in Hyndburn against Graham Jones and Karen Buckley.

The man has guts, I'll give him that.

Of course he has guts, he's full of shi...ne yer buttons wiv' brasso, only three ha'pence a tin.

Ken Moss · 29-04-2010, 18:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Of course he has guts, he's full of shi...ne yer buttons wiv' brasso, only three ha'pence a tin.

You can buy some, they sell it in Woolworths but I don't think they have any in.

shillelagh · 29-04-2010, 18:40

i wish he'd stayed around for rindy to meet him ... agree with you less .. i did my best .. but i didnt want to get banned .. so i cleaned up the reply to what you got .. otherwise i think i'd have been banned .. then accyweb would be minus its little angel

and you cant have that ....

Less · 29-04-2010, 19:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh

i wish he'd stayed around for rindy to meet him ... agree with you less .. i did my best .. but i didnt want to get banned .. so i cleaned up the reply to what you got .. otherwise i think i'd have been banned .. then accyweb would be minus its little angel

and you cant have that ....

Oh, I don't know, I've learned to live without MargaretR so...

wagstaffe · 29-04-2010, 19:26

"In this particular order, (mainly because this is how you put your points forward)."

Don't be so pedantic, it doesn't come across very well and sets a bad tone.

"Peace? At whom do you hope to aim that peace?"

The current terrorism threat level is Severe and the ongoing events through Wootton Bassett suggest we are at war with somebody.
We sent our troops in to Iraq and Aghanistan to make our streets safer, so I'm suggesting we try something different.
I'm no expert, but I recognise a failed policy when I see one.

"Corruption Czar no golden handshakes with gags attached leading to better governance"

‘Good’ governance is characterised as being participatory, accountable, transparent, efficient, responsive and inclusive, respecting the rule of law and minimising opportunities for corruption.
Lets clean ourselves up first then we can look at the EU and the books that haven't been signed off yet

DaveinGermany · 29-04-2010, 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

The man has guts, I'll give him that.

Which you'll Likely see as he eviscerates himself on his Samurai Sword, when he does his "Hari Kiri" bit, you know the noble ending thingy, after bringing down shame & disappointment on ones self & family. So endeth Dreams !

shillelagh · 29-04-2010, 19:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Oh, I don't know, I've learned to live without MargaretR so...

just think less .. if i not on accyweb .. id have time to come down to the research centre .. every day .. what would you rather have ...

Less · 29-04-2010, 19:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by wagstaffe

"In this particular order, (mainly because this is how you put your points forward)."

Don't be so pedantic, it doesn't come across very well and sets a bad tone.

"Peace? At whom do you hope to aim that peace?"

The current terrorism threat level is Severe and the ongoing events through Wootton Bassett suggest we are at war with somebody.
We sent our troops in to Iraq and Aghanistan to make our streets safer, so I'm suggesting we try something different.
I'm no expert, but I recognise a failed policy when I see one.

"Corruption Czar no golden handshakes with gags attached leading to better governance"

‘Good’ governance is characterised as being participatory, accountable, transparent, efficient, responsive and inclusive, respecting the rule of law and minimising opportunities for corruption.
Lets clean ourselves up first then we can look at the EU and the books that haven't been signed off yet

Ah that old chestnut, I know I can't win an argument so I'll start calling the questioner. (works for proper politicians but you aren't even close, so don't try).

At least I'm not so pedantry as to think I can fix the world by sticking it together with transparent bull.

Now, don't call me again you haven't earned the right until you give honest answers to a post that I took great care putting together from your ramblings, Ace hole.

Ken Moss · 29-04-2010, 19:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by wagstaffe

The current terrorism threat level is Severe and the ongoing events through Wootton Bassett suggest we are at war with somebody. We sent our troops in to Iraq and Aghanistan to make our streets safer, so I'm suggesting we try something different.

Oh come on now, don't go bandying the terrorism threat about to justify that war, and let's not kid ourselves that it was anything other than to appease the Americans and gain oilfields.

I'm firmly in the 'against' camp over that war and the whole Dubya regime but what exactly does 'severe threat level' actually mean?

Less · 29-04-2010, 20:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh

just think less .. if i not on accyweb .. id have time to come down to the research centre .. every day .. what would you rather have ...

The usual crew will be there tomo's so I won't have to suffer alone, the research may be a bit off thread though, a new hobby is spreading around the country, 'invent as many impractical and unworkable policies as can fit on half a page of accyweb'.

As usual all are welcome to come and share their own style of ignorance at these Railway Surgeries.

Eric · 29-04-2010, 20:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Oh come on now, don't go bandying the terrorism threat about to justify that war, and let's not kid ourselves that it was anything other than to appease the Americans and gain oilfields.

I'm firmly in the 'against' camp over that war and the whole Dubya regime but what exactly does 'severe threat level' actually mean?

Given the hate for America that GW and his predecessors ignited, I would say that "severe threat level" is similar to SNAFU. Actually, I think Bush elevated that to FUBAR.

Less · 29-04-2010, 20:50

By the way Wagstaffe, you may earn yourself a few brownie points if you start using accyweb as it's supposed to be used, as a community site with a variety of topics not just for electioneering.

Maybe then we will find some good points in amongst your ideas?

Eric · 29-04-2010, 21:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

By the way Wagstaffe, you may earn yourself a few brownie points if you start using accyweb as it's supposed to be used, as a community site with a variety of topics not just for electioneering.

Maybe then we will find some good points in amongst your ideas?

We can always hope ... where there's muck, there's brass

Ken Moss · 30-04-2010, 00:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

Given the hate for America that GW and his predecessors ignited, I would say that "severe threat level" is similar to SNAFU. Actually, I think Bush elevated that to FUBAR.

George W Bush tried to elevate the whole planet to FUBAR by interfering with every unstable country like a young boy with a stick pokes an ants' nest.

'I know, let's target Iran next...'

Thank God Obama got in when he did. Bush II was the worst warmongerer since Hitler and not one tear was shed the day he left Pennysylvania Avenue.