Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

and me, but is this the truth,I ask myself ?

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

sorry I could not hear Rob Heys very well as we are in wales. How much was the shortfall?If they were only offering £100,000 that is absolutely disgusting. Could anyone enlighten me please.

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

OK Chaps and Chapesses, I'm Micks mate who was at the court. These are some of the notes I took:

1) Don O'Neil, Rob, Phil Whalley, Ilias Khan were present and met beforehand with the brief.

2) ASFC were about 3rd on the court list.

3) HMRC Counsel pressed for winding up.

4) The Judge was sympathetic to HMRC, to say the least.

5) A further £125K of debt has now accumulated outside the petition

6) Payment yesterday was £96K

7) £100K now promised by the PFA

8) Balance to be paid by individual settlements. Also Chairman of leonard Cheshire foundation to make donation.

9) Club asked for 14 days to make payment.

10) Judge gave 7 days, and that's it - final.

Sorry this is not my usual verbal eloquence, but I know you want to hear ASAP

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

No probs Ozzy, you did have me worried for a second mate!!

As for Robs statement on 2Br, I personaly feel that He was sounding very upset, His voice was wavering and He seemed flustered................He is normaly fairly assured when interviewed.

I too heard Him say that they had paid just £100,000 with £10,000 to come today.......where is the rest of the money from the SOS appeal, or is the 'fundometer' not a true record of the amount raised?

They should be left in no doubt that there must be mass resignations IMMEDIATLEY, and NOT just those of O'Neil and Lazerus, I mean the board members aswell.

We have been thrown a lifeline by Messrs Khan and Marsden.....................DO NOT SCREW IT UP AGAIN.

All fans should now get behind these two guys and push for a 'new start' ...................starting at 6pm this evening outside the club.

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

Thank you tealeaf....if known it was u would of whooped sooner lmao

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

Probably upset cos he had to come out with it - truth for once.

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

so more lies from the board stated £100,000 was paid not £96,000

now we have another £125,000 debt on top

thanks to khan marsden and Chairman of leonard Cheshire foundation for their support

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

Don't know about a protest tonoght, think the fraud squad would be more appropriate :(

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

96K..................thought 116K was raised ???

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

Many thanks for that Tealeaf. Unfortunately, there are a number of items there - especially (5) - that make me even more worried.

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

why the hell only 96K when more than that has been raised.....O'neill your nothing but a *************



and thats coming from someone who knows naff all about footy

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

Thanks Tealeaf, The joint Chairs board and chief exc should resign on mass, after seeing this case through. What as happened to the monies raised on top of the 96000 which they have paid? It's a good job Ilyas was present, or we would definitly have no Club now. I can't believe the lies that have come out of the Club.

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

To paraphrase O'Neill on Friday, "We're nine-tenths of the way there" ... utterly shameful deceit :mad:.

Thanks again for reporting the truth Tealeaf.

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

it kinda proves my point that NOTHING has been put in by the board, all that money was put in by Stanley supporters

Re: Court case for Accrington Stanley
 

Katie, Ilyas is the chairman of the Leonard Cheshire Trust.