![]() |
re: Planning Applications
|
re: Planning Applications
Quote:
|
re: Planning Applications
Quote:
|
re: Planning Applications
Eeew hek ! More trouble brewing methinks :
11/09/0177 Erection of Retail Store (Class A1) Land at Heys Lane/Station with Road Great Harwood associated car parking, landscaping, access and servicing 12/05/2009 Aldi Stores Ltd |
re: Planning Applications
The building that Tesco originally put an offer in for, on Burnley road, Clayton, has now got an auction sign on it, so could be more supermarket sweeping going on.
|
re: Planning Applications
I'm not a happy bunny ... nothing on the website since period ending 15/5/09 !!
http://planetsmilies.net/kaos-animal...miley-6082.gif Yet, last week in the Observer, they had a list of applications. Did they get them sent by HBC ? Can't see that they visited Scaitliffe House to view. Wasn't much anyway, unless you consider Sparth House applying for a swimming pool. Course you will all know that Tesco's application has now been accepted for Great Harwood ... :( Are the general public being ignored now with regard to up-to-date information ? |
Re: Planning Applications
Quote:
|
Re: Planning Applications
Quote:
I think now though there is a slight rise in interest in general applications for the regeneration of our town ... because more information has become available. Years ago ... us working class would not be aware that we could have a say in what the council intended and wouldn't think our voices expressing opinion would have any clout. Now, however, it is there through the media, and through the internet. That is why I am so annoyed that they have not put up any details for weeks !! Someone being sloppy. We do on here, for example, discuss certain intentions of new developments which would not have been so openly displayed in the past. |
re: Planning Applications
Kate - all councillors get a list of planning applications (which have been submitted that week) emailed to them weekly. If you give me your email address in a PM - I will send you copies of the emails from w/e 15/05/09)
|
re: Planning Applications
Quote:
Great Claytonender ... will do .. but I will copy it on here. Still does not excuse the Planning Department though for the length of time since the last ones were put on their website. Had been set up as a public service which is not being fulfilled, and now taking up your precious time to do what you suggest. |
re: Planning Applications
And as for the drug rehabilitation centre Kate they know objections are going to be nearly zilch cos hardly any residents at present. Makes me wonder if the new developments backers are going to be best pleased at getting planning permission spending money on re-developing then having this put on the doorstep of the properties.
|
re: Planning Applications
Quote:
Their is one letter of objection in the Observer Bernie ... don't know whether you have seen it from an elderly couple who live opposite the proposed site. They feel because the site is more isolated than the original suggestion of Avenue Parade, there will not be as much supervision ordered on Paradise Street/Eagle Street where there is not even a CCTV camera. They already have experiences of large boozing parties on their back drive. |
Re: Planning Applications
Quote:
|
re: Planning Applications
Quote:
|
re: Planning Applications
Hope you got the copies of the planning applications that I emailed you. I was about to email the planning dept to ask when the website would be uptodate - but when I checked the website I noticed that the reports were there but in the wrong order.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:12. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com