Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Chat (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/)
-   -   Margaret Thatcher (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f69/margaret-thatcher-64009.html)

Lucysgirl 15-04-2013 11:23

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Greeny (Post 1052069)
Thatcher took the free milk from our school children . Labour reversed this by putting free fresh fruit and veg in schools for every pupil.

Erm::: In 1968, under Harold Wilson, the Labour government scrapped free milk for secondary school pupils

DtheP47 15-04-2013 11:44

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
I was interested to read today that Len McCluskey the leader of Unite the country's largest trade union has been re-elected despite winning the support of less than one in 10 members 1.5 million members..he won 144,000 votes.Methinks instead of cracking open the champagne, joining the internet lynch mobs or downloading a pretty poor protest song to celebrate the death of an 87 year old woman, these so called socialists would have been motivated to get up off there arses and show their support to a Union that pumped £7million into the Labour party's coffers over the last two years. ;)

Lucysgirl 15-04-2013 11:50

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Shurm (Post 1052246)
A picture here of her during her visit in 1983, I'm the one in the centre to the left at the back watching out for the flying eggs :eek: My girlfriend at the time is in the centre of the picture thats why I kept it (honest :D).

Nice pic - I was hoping my daughter would be in it (no). She told me after the event that she had gone with some college pals to see the historic occasion and her best friend had thrown eggs at Thatcher. A good waste of an egg if you ask me.

cashman 15-04-2013 11:51

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Does it actually say what percentage voted? I recall it doing so after Cameron won.;)

DtheP47 15-04-2013 11:55

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
15% Mr c

Lucysgirl 15-04-2013 12:04

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by JIMSLAD (Post 1052412)
How can they call for a minute's silence after she tried to blame the fans for Hillsbrough to support the lie's of her private army A.K.A South Yorkshire Police

I was one of thousands watching the events as they happened on TV and the police actually pushing back the people as they tried to climb over the fence out of the throng. I will never forget one young chap shouting to a policeman "You're killing us". I know the police maintained the crowd were drunk but as all evidence was supposed to be presented at enquiries I was indignant that no blame was attached to the police or the stadium owners.

As Thatcher wouldn't have been watching the TV but would have relied on other officials to keep her informed I'm of the opinion that she wasn't given the full facts. I know the families say she knew everything but it's only decades later that we've learnt of cover ups.

Lucysgirl 15-04-2013 12:42

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth (Post 1052544)
We used to make more cars than anywhere else but the USA-they were built by British owned companies. .......... factories had a strike on.
Result- people with a choice bought foreign(Japanese mainly at first) which were the opposite of everything above.
.

We lived in Holland in the 1960s when the revolutionary Mini car was designed. One of our friends ordered one and was promised a ten week delivery. Thirty-seven (37) weeks later the dealership still hadn't received any of the minis ordered.

We were definitely the sick man of Europe.

Lucysgirl 15-04-2013 13:12

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1053352)
It didn't happen wi me late missus 2 years after either, have to say i was too gutted to bother about anyone else.

As I'm a female I don't have the workings of a male mind - but I know how badly my father took the passing of my mother which coincidentally came in the "winter of discontent" when she was in her fifties and you have my deepest sympathy.

Lucysgirl 15-04-2013 13:27

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1053355)
Although first sighted by an English navigator in 1592, the first landing (English) did not occur until almost a century later in 1690, and the first settlement (French) was not established until 1764. The colony was turned over to Spain two years later and the islands have since been the subject of a territorial dispute, first between Britain and Spain, then between Britain and Argentina. The UK asserted its claim to the islands by establishing a naval garrison there in 1833. Argentina invaded the islands on 2 April 1982. The British responded with an expeditionary force that landed seven weeks later and after fierce fighting forced an Argentine surrender on 14 June 1982. With hostilities ended and Argentine forces withdrawn, UK administration resumed. In response to renewed calls from Argentina for Britain to relinquish control of the islands, a referendum was held in March 2013, which resulted in 99.8% of the population voting to remain a part of the UK.------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is taken from the C.I.A. World Factbook, Lucy, Its always been disputed by 4 countries not just the argies, we occupy the islands, but were they ever ours? Debateable.even Doubtful.

I recall we were given that history lesson at the time and maybe the islanders wouldn't have objected to changing their allegiance if Argentina hadn't been run by an awful dictator.

BTW anyone who saw the TV newsreels of the time couldn't have failed to see the name on several Argentinian buildings of HIGGINS or O'HIGGINS - seems the Irish were there fighting the Spanish and the English

cashman 15-04-2013 13:47

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucysgirl (Post 1053374)
I recall we were given that history lesson at the time and maybe the islanders wouldn't have objected to changing their allegiance if Argentina hadn't been run by an awful dictator.

Doubt that very much as the recent referendum would indicate.;) But would never do fer us all to think the same way, would be a boring old world.:D Agree Galteri or however its spelt, was a complete loony, would have used another word but the swear checker would have me. :D

Eric 15-04-2013 17:22

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Just heard the good news ... coverage of the planting begins here at 5:00 am ... makes it easier to avoid.:mosher: Canada's version of Thatcher, Brian Mulroney, will be attending. And here's how Canadians responded to his leadership in 1993:

Canadian federal election, 1993 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

See, folks. Democracy can work.;)

kestrelx 16-04-2013 17:03

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany (Post 1052916)
Bit of over exaggeration don't you think Kes ? Okay she wasn't everyones cup of tea ..... but Hitler ? No I don't recall anything in her tenure about death camps, attempted extermination of several races or for that matter invasion, conquering & subjugation of other Countries peoples (trust me I know, insider information & all that due to being in the Army at that time ;) think I would've noticed) .

Lively debate is one thing & there's always going to be a huge gulf dividing the opinions of folks where ol' Mags is concerned, but pumping out the populist rhetoric of her being a "Nasty Nazi", is quite simply unrealistic.

What I mean is that she was deluded and out of touch with reality to the extent of going a head with the Poll Tax - that lead to her downfall. Ok she was nuthin like a Nasti Nazi - but you get the parallels. She didn't have the brains to get out like Tony Blair did - before being ousted by those below him in the party!

DaveinGermany 16-04-2013 18:32

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx (Post 1053552)
deluded and out of touch with reality (or precise & single-minded) to the extent of going a head with the Poll Tax. She didn't have the brains to get out like Tony Blair did (accepted her fate & with more integrity perhaps) - before being ousted by those below him in the party!

Again Kes, I think it's a matter or perspectives, to some, whatever their reasons real or perceived she was & always will be the Antichrist, a vile spiteful woman. Whereas others see her as a moderniser, a person who believed her actions right for the Country, doing what was needed as opposed to what was wanted by the populace.

Her legacy can still be seen today, good & bad dependent on your outlook, that won't change no matter the outpourings pro or contra about her. Tomorrow, an old woman will be getting buried with a certain amount of pomp & pageantry, the fact that she was Britains first female Prime Minister & a very divisive figure in life & even now in death shouldn't really matter. We can't change human nature, so what will be, will be.

cashman 16-04-2013 18:35

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
She should have been led in State..............Middle of the Thames, so all the tories could march past to pay respects.:D

jaysay 16-04-2013 18:43

Re: Margaret Thatcher
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman (Post 1053605)
She should have been led in State..............Middle of the Thames, so all the tories could march past to pay respects.:D

Even I'd have tried to make that Cashy:rolleyes:


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com