M&S Muslim Refuses To Serve 'Unclean' Bible - Page 7

cashman · 18-01-2008, 13:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

but it WASNT a bible was it ? so why refuse to touch it

ok so every newspaper that has reported this story has the word " bible " on it, now i dont know if they sell papers at marks' but if they do, would she refuse to sell the papers too !!!!

what a load of bulldung !!!

bible stories, if ya knew a bit more about respect for things ya would have the answer, ya sure ya aint a dingle?

BLACKBURN RAVER · 18-01-2008, 14:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

bible stories, if ya knew a bit more about respect for things ya would have the answer, ya sure ya aint a dingle?

and you know exactly what about me

...dont come on here slagging me off about respecing things when you dont even know me !!! if you ever did get to know me then i would accept your words, untill then, lets not make this personal eh !! just becaue im expressing my opinion and it goes against one of your own !!!

cashman · 18-01-2008, 14:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

and you know exactly what about me

...dont come on here slagging me off about respecing things when you dont even know me !!! if you ever did get to know me then i would accept your words, untill then, lets not make this personal eh !! just becaue im expressing my opinion and it goes against one of your own !!!

that aint slagging ya off get real.

its a bit of crack hence the grin,but if that eludes you

shakermaker · 18-01-2008, 14:16

I think Willow & Cashman were just making the point that the checkout bird saw the word 'Bible' and jumped to the conclusion that it was the Holy Bible and reacted accordingly.

I still believe what I said originally however. It's just a sensationalised tabloid warbling.

Gayle · 18-01-2008, 14:18

I've had a scout around the web for all the different stories about this and it would appear that it first appeared in the Telegraph and The Daily Mail - all the other papers and websites are reporting what they first read in the Mail, actually quoting that as their source in some cases.

The Mail and the Telegraph do report it slightly differently. The Mail sensationally says that she refused to serve the woman, this is clearly not the case as she was happy to serve her just not touch the book and put it into the bag. The Telegraph's wording is slightly different about the 'unclean' part and I'm tempted to agree with Willow on this one. Muslim women are seen as 'unclean' when they are menstuating therefore, she would not have wanted to touch her holy book or any other holy book at that time.

The fact that this story was first run in the Mail and Telegraph leads me to believe that the odds of the report being skewed are quite high!

yerself · 18-01-2008, 17:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gayle

The fact that this story was first run in the Mail and Telegraph leads me to believe that the odds of the report being skewed are quite high!

Let me guess, 'The Guardian' is the font of all truthfulness and knowledge.

cashman · 18-01-2008, 18:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLACKBURN RAVER

and you know exactly what about me

...dont come on here slagging me off about respecing things when you dont even know me !!! if you ever did get to know me then i would accept your words, untill then, lets not make this personal eh !! just becaue im expressing my opinion and it goes against one of your own !!!

don't know you at all- but that aint breaking me heart.

the respect i was refering to is earlier in the thread (post32) i think. i for 1 aint no bible basher, but have respect for differant religions/people, so long as it aint shoved down me throat, i said if you knew more about respect, that IS NOT slagging you off, its as you have said an opinion.if ya wanna sulk about it- tough.

mr_flibble · 18-01-2008, 21:07

To be honest id take the whole story with a salt mine full of salt. It is in the end published by The Hate Mail...oops sorry i mean the Daily Mail, a paper that once supported Hitler.

blazey · 18-01-2008, 23:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr_flibble

To be honest id take the whole story with a salt mine full of salt. It is in the end published by The Hate Mail...oops sorry i mean the Daily Mail, a paper that once supported Hitler.

We as a country love the national holiday that hitler created and act like Nazi's for one day a year.

As for the story, its definately been manipulated to get a particular reaction, and the facts clearly are goig to have been completely different to what has been printed.

keetah992000 · 19-01-2008, 00:09

just been reading this thread and it is interesting ... however i am not bothered who was right or wrong- but am wondering if M&S still has strong Jewish roots ?

mr_flibble · 19-01-2008, 01:02

Michał Marks one of the founders of M&S was indeed jewish. He was also of polish decent i believe.

mani · 19-01-2008, 03:01

i'm shocked that its taken so long for anyone to mention the fact m&s is a jewish owned company

what the hell was the muslim thinking workin for the infidels?!

behead her i say but only after she's put the bible in the bag...

steeljack · 19-01-2008, 05:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by keetah992000

just been reading this thread and it is interesting ... however i am not bothered who was right or wrong- but am wondering if M&S still has strong Jewish roots ?

yep , same here , I've been wondering if Garindas bacon is kosher or Halal