Accrington Web

Accrington Web (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Community Talk (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f127/)
-   -   Planning Applications (https://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f127/planning-applications-27426.html)

park381 11-12-2010 18:15

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 868243)
I did puzzle about that one, Park, as to if he had some sort of interest ... just thought he may have been trying to do his best for one of his constituents. Wonder which way he voted though.

As stated previous, he should have declaired an interest and left the meeting, but you put it very well "one of his constituents" lol :alright:

park381 11-12-2010 18:17

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 868247)
I think they should make them remove the work they have done before the planning application is decided on. I think it is wrong for a builder to start without it as they know they need it. Stick them with a big fine so they will wait next time.

A perfect world.................I wish, but I agree with you.

Alan Varrechia 11-12-2010 20:07

Re: Planning Applications
 
I live just around the corner from there and they have been working on there for a good few weeks. Makes me hope they don't get the permission, but somehow i think thats already been sorted. The power of the brown envelope strikes again.........:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolle yes:

Neil 12-12-2010 07:00

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 868255)
A perfect world.................I wish, but I agree with you.

The planning lot at the Council appear to have no real power. Why are they not knocking on the site formans door and telling him to stop work as they have no planning permission to be working?

park381 12-12-2010 07:42

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 868333)
The planning lot at the Council appear to have no real power. Why are they not knocking on the site formans door and telling him to stop work as they have no planning permission to be working?

That is true, they add conditions to planning permissions granted, conditions designed to protect residents from noise, pollution, and extended working hours. Then make excuses as to why they do not enforce those conditions :rolleyes:

Neil 12-12-2010 07:49

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 868341)
That is true, they add conditions to planning permissions granted, conditions designed to protect residents from noise, pollution, and extended working hours. Then make excuses as to why they do not enforce those conditions :rolleyes:

Are any of our Councillor members on the planning committee?
If so maybe they can explain how a building delvelopment like this can start without planning permission and why it has not been shut down yet.

park381 12-12-2010 08:26

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 868343)
Are any of our Councillor members on the planning committee?
If so maybe they can explain how a building delvelopment like this can start without planning permission and why it has not been shut down yet.

Councillor M Haworth is vice chair, Councillor B Roberts, Councillor D Hayes are all members of the planning committee, if they are also members of accy web may be they could explain why the development is being allowed to carry on prior to planning permission being given ;)

Neil 12-12-2010 08:33

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 868346)
Councillor M Haworth is vice chair, Councillor B Roberts, Councillor D Hayes are all members of the planning committee, if they are also members of accy web may be they could explain why the development is being allowed to carry on prior to planning permission being given ;)

So what will be a no then.

The Councillors are only on the committe though, we must have enforcement officers. Is it not there job to make sure this sort of thing does not happen?

park381 12-12-2010 08:44

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 868348)
So what will be a no then.

The Councillors are only on the committe though, we must have enforcement officers. Is it not there job to make sure this sort of thing does not happen?

I think its the technical officers of the council that prepare reports for the planning committee that report will contain details of the application and reasons it should be either accepted or refused, however the planning committee do not always vote as per the report recommendation as has happened in the past, sometimes resulting in an appeal by the applicant. Yes HBC does have an "enforcement officer"...........over worked by all accounts but he/she has been a busy bee looking at the list attached.

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...s_01.11.10.pdf

jaysay 12-12-2010 09:20

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 868252)
As stated previous, he should have declaired an interest and left the meeting, but you put it very well "one of his constituents" lol :alright:

Don't think that is quite correct park, a councillor only has to declare an interest if he has involvement with the said application or with the applicant, can't see anything wrong with a constituent lobbying a councillor with regards to planning no more than contacting him/her with regards to say their dust bin not being emptied, so long as no sort of inducement is offered

park381 12-12-2010 09:42

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 868351)
Don't think that is quite correct park, a councillor only has to declare an interest if he has involvement with the said application or with the applicant, can't see anything wrong with a constituent lobbying a councillor with regards to planning no more than contacting him/her with regards to say their dust bin not being emptied, so long as no sort of inducement is offered


Those are your thoughts jaysay, why then did the officer make a point of including in the report the fact that a councillor who was a member of the planning committee had asked for the application to be considered by the planning committee.Did the officer not consider the councillor had displayed an interest in the application in this case. Plus the application would have been considered by the planning committee so there was no need for the councillor to make that request in the first place.

MargaretR 12-12-2010 09:45

Re: Planning Applications
 
On looking at the pdf file of enforcements I noticed
18 Nab Lane, Oswaldtwistle. 149 R37.1/ 149
This is the former home of my son- his ex inlaws live there now.
How do I find out what was enforced?

Bernard Dawson 12-12-2010 09:53

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 868362)
On looking at the pdf file of enforcements I noticed
18 Nab Lane, Oswaldtwistle. 149 R37.1/ 149
This is the former home of my son- his ex inlaws live there now.
How do I find out what was enforced?

The Planning Department would tell you. I may still have the agenda for the meeting.Is it a recent meeting?

jaysay 12-12-2010 09:58

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 868361)
Those are your thoughts jaysay, why then did the officer make a point of including in the report the fact that a councillor who was a member of the planning committee had asked for the application to be considered by the planning committee.Did the officer not consider the councillor had displayed an interest in the application in this case. Plus the application would have been considered by the planning committee so there was no need for the councillor to make that request in the first place.

Could well have been that the councillor was merely trying to move the application on by contacting the officer, on the behest of his constituent, after all that is what councillors are there for

MargaretR 12-12-2010 10:01

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 868366)
The Planning Department would tell you. I may still have the agenda for the meeting.Is it a recent meeting?

I don't know whether it was recent, nor do I have any date.
A large extension was under construction on the gable side at the time his (now ex) wife took off two years ago, leaving her parents in residence with him:eek:. An intolerable situation - he moved out - they stayed.
The divorce earlier this year signed his share in the property to his ex - the inlaws are still there.
Perhaps it is better that I don't know, since my son has now moved on to much greener pastures (wedding soon :D)

jaysay 12-12-2010 10:02

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 868372)
I don't know whether it was recent, nor do I have any date.
A large extension was under construction on the gable side at the time his (now ex) wife took off two years ago, leaving her parents in residence with him:eek:. An intolerable situation - he moved out - they stayed.
The divorce earlier this year signed his share in the property to his ex - the inlaws are still there.
Perhaps it is better that I don't know, since my son has now moved on to much greener pastures (wedding soon :D)

Another new hat Margaret:D

MargaretR 12-12-2010 10:07

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 868373)
Another new hat Margaret:D

Bought recently on ebay -a designer fedora type - no silly feather things for me.

park381 12-12-2010 10:52

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 868362)
On looking at the pdf file of enforcements I noticed
18 Nab Lane, Oswaldtwistle. 149 R37.1/ 149
This is the former home of my son- his ex inlaws live there now.
How do I find out what was enforced?

Planning Enforcement - Control of Unauthorised Development

jaysay 12-12-2010 11:47

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 868374)
Bought recently on ebay -a designer fedora type - no silly feather things for me.

Photo Please:D

MargaretR 12-12-2010 11:49

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 868387)

Interesting - thanks
Planning permission was granted for the extension - maybe the ex inlaws are tring to complete it in an unauthorised way - just glad that my son is rid of the problem.

katex 12-12-2010 12:13

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 868396)
Interesting - thanks
Planning permission was granted for the extension - maybe the ex inlaws are tring to complete it in an unauthorised way - just glad that my son is rid of the problem.


Can't just sort out how they number them Margaret.... think 37 is the week ... that would be w/c 19th Sept for 2010 .maybe 1 is the year and then a number for that year ? :confused:

Looks like you would have to apply if you wanted more details, however, a little more information is given when they come up at Planning Meetings:

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...t_13-10-10.pdf

I have gone back to 2007 .. nothing there.

katex 12-12-2010 12:19

Re: Planning Applications
 
There again, 149 appears to be some stables... so completely confused now ... :D

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa..._June_2010.pdf

MargaretR 12-12-2010 13:03

Re: Planning Applications
 
It isn't important that I find out - If the (ex)inlaws hear I am asking, it could stir a quietened hornets nest. If the facts aren't online I don't want to look further.
Thanks for the help in looking.

park381 13-12-2010 18:48

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 868408)
There again, 149 appears to be some stables... so completely confused now ... :D

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa..._June_2010.pdf

I am not surprised kate, I think the members of the planning committee will be confused as well, the report is designed to confuse, hence no questions, a good way to work if you can get away with it. There are several questions I will be asking the "enforcement team" some of the details in the report are not correct :D
I think the only way to find out is to send the email with the enforcement details identified and wait for the "zipped" file to land in your inbox. ;)

katex 15-12-2010 22:09

Re: Planning Applications
 
Still some proposed house building go on at least:

11/10/0516 Full: Erection of 8 No houses and associated 06/12/2010
parking

Hunts Yard Clayton Street
Great Harwood

Mr D Mason

Not sure where Hunts Yard is on Clayton Street ?

park381 16-12-2010 06:51

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 869319)
Still some proposed house building go on at least:

11/10/0516 Full: Erection of 8 No houses and associated 06/12/2010
parking
Hunts Yard Clayton Street
Great Harwood
Mr D Mason
Not sure where Hunts Yard is on Clayton Street ?

Clayton street, is that not where the famous chip shop is?

jaysay 16-12-2010 09:03

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 869350)
Clayton street, is that not where the famous chip shop is?

Best Chippy in East Lancs that Park, well it was, ain't been in for years

park381 16-12-2010 10:08

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 869367)
Best Chippy in East Lancs that Park, well it was, ain't been in for years

Me neither, used to make a point of being in Gt Harwood at lunch time when I was working............ like you say the best in East Lancs

park381 22-12-2010 18:33

Re: Planning Applications
 
I am a little confused here, from the LET

Row over new Accrington housing estate (From Lancashire Telegraph)

It seems that planning permission has been granted but I found this

http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk...ember_2010.doc

What are Hyndburn thinking about, allowing houses to be built where there is a risk of flood :confused:
Anyone found any other information that may shed some light on all this.

MargaretR 22-12-2010 18:41

Re: Planning Applications
 
To be built by 'Keepmoat Housing' - how ironic :D

I once found a floodplain map on the web. The housing on the site of the old Threebrooks Mill is in/on one - so this wont be the first time.

park381 22-12-2010 19:33

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 870604)
To be built by 'Keepmoat Housing' - how ironic :D

I once found a floodplain map on the web. The housing on the site of the old Threebrooks Mill is in/on one - so this wont be the first time.

nice one Margaret ;) Threebrooks mill ?

MargaretR 22-12-2010 19:39

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 870627)
nice one Margaret ;) Threebrooks mill ?

...at end of RoeGreave road Ossy.
My mum and dad worked in that mill - there was a mill lodge there too - fed by the adjacent Tinker Brook.

park381 23-12-2010 06:50

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 870630)
...at end of RoeGreave road Ossy.
My mum and dad worked in that mill - there was a mill lodge there too - fed by the adjacent Tinker Brook.

Are there not houses on there now?

jaysay 23-12-2010 08:39

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 870690)
Are there not houses on there now?

Been houses on there for about ten years now Park,

park381 23-12-2010 09:38

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 870691)
Been houses on there for about ten years now Park,

So that ia not the area connected with the planning permission that is causing the row, it could be an area subject to flooding, but has still been granted planning permission by Hyndburn Borough Council :confused: :confused:

jaysay 23-12-2010 09:55

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 870714)
So that is not the area connected with the planning permission that is causing the row, it could be an area subject to flooding, but has still been granted planning permission by Hyndburn Borough Council :confused: :confused:

To be quite honest Park I don't really follow planning, I only know that there are quite a few new houses on the left at the end of Roe Greave Road which have been there for a long time now

MargaretR 23-12-2010 10:01

Re: Planning Applications
 
Those houses and flats went up about 7 years ago. I have lived where I am for 8yrs and I recall the noise made during the site preparation
Accrington BB5, UK - Google Maps

jaysay 23-12-2010 10:19

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 870729)
Those houses and flats went up about 7 years ago. I have lived where I am for 8yrs and I recall the noise made during the site preparation
Accrington BB5, UK - Google Maps

Thought it was longer that that Margaret, but obviously not

park381 23-12-2010 11:00

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR (Post 870729)
Those houses and flats went up about 7 years ago. I have lived where I am for 8yrs and I recall the noise made during the site preparation
Accrington BB5, UK - Google Maps

Those are in ossy, the ones that have just been granted planning permission are off blackburn road / lower antley street, must be the land below the new bungalows or are they sheltered units.

glasgow guy 09-01-2011 09:52

Re: Planning Applications
 
the old adelphi pub down town is being turned into a large 4 bedroom house, plans have already been submitted and approved - and they have already began to clear it out..
I know this as my sister has bought the house next door to it and they were told and shown plans of the pub/soon to be house...

katex 09-01-2011 13:45

Re: Planning Applications
 
Indeed, GG and this was the approval, as I am sure your sister knows .. might be worth it for her to keep on eye on any deviations from the plans ;)

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/site/cu...0BB5%206PJ.pdf

We have discussed it on here somewhere .. can't find it though. :confused:

Tealeaf 09-01-2011 17:24

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 874406)
Indeed, GG and this was the approval, as I am sure your sister knows .. might be worth it for her to keep on eye on any deviations from the plans ;)

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/site/cu...0BB5%206PJ.pdf

We have discussed it on here somewhere .. can't find it though. :confused:

Aye, especially when in 6 months time there is a sign unveiled outside the building reading 'Adelphi Curry, Kebab & Pizza Takeaway'.

Neil 10-01-2011 08:49

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 874436)
Aye, especially when in 6 months time there is a sign unveiled outside the building reading 'Adelphi Curry, Kebab & Pizza Takeaway'.


Sounds about right, time to move I think.

claytonender 10-01-2011 22:02

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 874436)
Aye, especially when in 6 months time there is a sign unveiled outside the building reading 'Adelphi Curry, Kebab & Pizza Takeaway'.

They would have to apply for planning permission to change a dwelling into a commercial premises. As the building is in such a prominent place, I am sure that any change of use would be reported to the planning department.

Bernard Dawson 10-01-2011 22:31

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender (Post 874602)
They would have to apply for planning permission to change a dwelling into a commercial premises. As the building is in such a prominent place, I am sure that any change of use would be reported to the planning department.

You can rest assured on that point.

Neil 11-01-2011 07:48

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender (Post 874602)
They would have to apply for planning permission to change a dwelling into a commercial premises. As the building is in such a prominent place, I am sure that any change of use would be reported to the planning department.

I thought the usual way was to just do and apply for retro permission with the Council enforcement officers doing little to stop them. Can't remember last time I read about someone being stopped building or being forced to return a building to how it was because they did not apply for planning permission first.

Please prove me wrong on this, it would be good to know people can't just do what they want. There are some post on this thread about houses being built that had not had planning approved first

park381 13-01-2011 18:46

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 874623)
I thought the usual way was to just do and apply for retro permission with the Council enforcement officers doing little to stop them. Can't remember last time I read about someone being stopped building or being forced to return a building to how it was because they did not apply for planning permission first.

Please prove me wrong on this, it would be good to know people can't just do what they want. There are some post on this thread about houses being built that had not had planning approved first

I wish, some people think they can do as they please, but again that depends on who you are, hows this for trying to get away with it

No permission for dome on Blackburn mosque (From Lancashire Telegraph)

The dome is fixed to a bulit up felt roof that covers a "tank room", me thinks building regs, structural calcs.need I go on :rolleyes:

Neil 14-01-2011 10:09

Re: Planning Applications
 
I know I think about things in simple terms but almost everything without planning permission that requires it should be put back to its original state before planning permission can be apllied for.

That would cost those who wish to break the rules money and stop them doing it. Retrospective permission should be very rare.

Any work carried out by professional builders without permission should lead to a big fine for the builder. They know the rules so should not build without permission.

Why can our Councils/Government not see things so simply?

park381 14-01-2011 13:42

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 875158)
I know I think about things in simple terms but almost everything without planning permission that requires it should be put back to its original state before planning permission can be apllied for.
That would cost those who wish to break the rules money and stop them doing it. Retrospective permission should be very rare.
Any work carried out by professional builders without permission should lead to a big fine for the builder. They know the rules so should not build without permission.
Why can our Councils/Government not see things so simply?

How true, I agree with every word, the planning enforcement system needs to be toughened up, with heavy fines for those that try to "get away with it"

Neil 14-01-2011 13:49

Re: Planning Applications
 
You should have put


"heavy fines"


in big bold letters, someone at HBC might see it and think it could be a way to make a few quid.

park381 14-01-2011 13:55

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 875193)
How true, I agree with every word, the planning enforcement system needs to be toughened up, with heavy fines for those that try to "get away with it"

Here's another classic case, the applicant wants to chop more trees down because they are to near his new houses, houses not built in the spot that had been originally planned. :rolleyes:


Bid to knock down trees at luxury Blackburn project rejected (From Lancashire Telegraph)

The comments below this article in the let make interesting reading

Neil 14-01-2011 14:28

He should be forced to move the houses if they are built in the wrong place. If he can't read drawings to build them in the right place what else could he have done wrong. How far off the agreed site are they?

katex 14-01-2011 15:02

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by glasgow guy (Post 874334)
the old adelphi pub down town is being turned into a large 4 bedroom house, plans have already been submitted and approved - and they have already began to clear it out..
I know this as my sister has bought the house next door to it and they were told and shown plans of the pub/soon to be house...

This was the article in the LEC, GG re. advising change of use. Just spotted the comment by 'Manwell' ... eeew hek .. spooks... lol.

Plan to turn historic Accrington pub into family home (From Blackburn Citizen)

katex 14-01-2011 15:16

Re: Planning Applications
 
Agree there should be some heavy fine put in place for people who ignore planning rules ... 'Ignorance of the law is no excuse' should be applied.

There are loads of enforcement notices every year for the committee to consider .. granted those who have overstepped the mark on their granted PP mostly.

Having to pull a building down on retrospective if not in line with regulations does happen on all types of buildings including signs, shop fronts, etc. Think it reasonable to accept if they have built it in accordance with Planning, but a slap in the pocket, with a heavy fine, would not go amiss. Would at least help to cover the cost to the council.

Neil 14-01-2011 15:35

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875224)
Think it reasonable to accept if they have built it in accordance with Planning, but a slap in the pocket, with a heavy fine, would not go amiss. Would at least help to cover the cost to the council.

But what if they are built it as it should be but not in the right place though? Should they have to pull in down again and rebuild in the right place if they wish?

katex 14-01-2011 15:54

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 875233)
But what if they are built it as it should be but not in the right place though? Should they have to pull in down again and rebuild in the right place if they wish?

Only guessing like ... Park will probably know more, but I guess if it were on the same land, but just in a slightly different position which did not flout any planning rules would be OK. Does appear a bit suspicious though that maybe this builder thought that he would get permission to chop down the trees if he did this. Maybe that was his plan all along (whoops did I really say that !).

katex 14-01-2011 16:36

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 875092)
I wish, some people think they can do as they please, but again that depends on who you are, hows this for trying to get away with it

No permission for dome on Blackburn mosque (From Lancashire Telegraph)

The dome is fixed to a bulit up felt roof that covers a "tank room", me thinks building regs, structural calcs.need I go on :rolleyes:

If you scroll down on the comments, some jester ... SS11 .. has stated permission has been granted ! Was only submitted (retrospectively of course) on 12th January ... and no decisions yet as I can see. :rolleyes:

jaysay 14-01-2011 17:50

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875224)
Agree there should be some heavy fine put in place for people who ignore planning rules ... 'Ignorance of the law is no excuse' should be applied.

There are loads of enforcement notices every year for the committee to consider .. granted those who have overstepped the mark on their granted PP mostly.

Having to pull a building down on retrospective if not in line with regulations does happen on all types of buildings including signs, shop fronts, etc. Think it reasonable to accept if they have built it in accordance with Planning, but a slap in the pocket, with a heavy fine, would not go amiss. Would at least help to cover the cost to the council.

I think you'll find that if retro planning permission is applied for, it has to adhere to the planning regs just like any other, to turn it down is not really wise, because if appealed to, I think the home secretary, (I'm not sure on this) it could cost the council a hell of a lot of money, maybe Bernard or Joan my be able to shed light on this as they are at the coal face as it were

Bernard Dawson 14-01-2011 18:22

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 875276)
I think you'll find that if retro planning permission is applied for, it has to adhere to the planning regs just like any other, to turn it down is not really wise, because if appealed to, I think the home secretary, (I'm not sure on this) it could cost the council a hell of a lot of money, maybe Bernard or Joan my be able to shed light on this as they are at the coal face as it were

That's right, planning law applies whether it's retrospective or not.A planning authority can't turn down an application because it's retrospective. But a development that's been started without planning permission runs the risk of course of not complying with planning law. And then the developer could be told to knock it down.

Its the Planning Inspectorate that deals with appeals.

jaysay 14-01-2011 18:24

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 875291)
That's right, planning law applies whether it's retrospective or not.A planning authority can't turn down an application because it's retrospective. But a development that's been started without planning permission runs the risk of course of not complying with planning law. And then the developer could be told to knock it down.

Its the Planning Inspectorate that deals with appeals.

Thanks Bernard, but I think I'm right in saying that if an appeal is upheld it could cost the council a lot of cash

katex 14-01-2011 18:34

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 875276)
I think you'll find that if retro planning permission is applied for, it has to adhere to the planning regs just like any other, to turn it down is not really wise, because if appealed to, I think the home secretary, (I'm not sure on this) it could cost the council a hell of a lot of money, maybe Bernard or Joan my be able to shed light on this as they are at the coal face as it were

Of course it is not wise, that is what I was trying to say, as that would just be bloody minded on behalf of a council. If it fits all the rules, then they have to be reasonable and let it through .... although they still should be taught that PP has to be sought in the first place like everyone else.

It has to be something very special to reach the Secretary of State.

Bernard Dawson 14-01-2011 18:34

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 875293)
Thanks Bernard, but I think I'm right in saying that if an appeal is upheld it could cost the council a lot of cash

It can, and the Council as lost appeals in the past. And as you say it can be an expensive job. You've got to have sound planning grounds for turning an application down.

jaysay 14-01-2011 18:38

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 875299)
It can, and the Council as lost appeals in the past. And as you say it can be an expensive job. You've got to have sound planning grounds for turning an application down.

And of course that applies to ALL applications including retro

jaysay 14-01-2011 18:45

Re: Planning Applications
 
I think the last retro planning application that i can remember being turned down was the garden on the garage roof of the Chippy on Catlow Hall Street Ossy, and that was quite a few years ago

katex 14-01-2011 22:15

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 875307)
I think the last retro planning application that i can remember being turned down was the garden on the garage roof of the Chippy on Catlow Hall Street Ossy, and that was quite a few years ago

Oh dearest Jaysay, please don't have me looking for all the retrospective one's that have been turned down ... too hard a task.

They are usually very small as per your example you have submitted and even if they have stepped outside the rules, usually there is guidance to put it right.

You won't get many big builds doing this, so that is why you think they do not exist. If they did ... they know what the Planning rules are anyway.

Here is a little one from a recent meeting which is going to legal :

8. ENFORCEMENT NOTICES BEING PREPARED BY LEGAL
8.1
The enforcement officer has sent memos to the Council’s legal
department with a view to taking enforcement action in respect of:

-
208/210 Union Road, Oswaldtwistle – Unauthorised shop front in
conservation area (Following second refusal of retrospective planning
application)


lancsdave 14-01-2011 22:20

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875390)
8. ENFORCEMENT NOTICES BEING PREPARED BY LEGAL
8.1 The enforcement officer has sent memos to the Council’s legal
department with a view to taking enforcement action in respect of:

-
208/210 Union Road, Oswaldtwistle – Unauthorised shop front in
conservation area (Following second refusal of retrospective planning
application)





Not a good advert for an Estate Agent is it ? :D

katex 14-01-2011 22:36

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave (Post 875392)
Not a good advert for an Estate Agent is it ? :D
[/left]

Oh, is that what it is ..hahaha .. did wonder. Ironic.

jaysay 15-01-2011 08:50

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875395)
Oh, is that what it is ..hahaha .. did wonder. Ironic.

I Could just been a council officer just don't like estate agents:D:D

park381 15-01-2011 15:40

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875252)
If you scroll down on the comments, some jester ... SS11 .. has stated permission has been granted ! Was only submitted (retrospectively of course) on 12th January ... and no decisions yet as I can see. :rolleyes:

I do think BwD will be require full structural calcs, not be surprised if they don't make them take it down :D

park381 15-01-2011 15:54

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875239)
Only guessing like ... Park will probably know more, but I guess if it were on the same land, but just in a slightly different position which did not flout any planning rules would be OK. Does appear a bit suspicious though that maybe this builder thought that he would get permission to chop down the trees if he did this. Maybe that was his plan all along (whoops did I really say that !).

You could be correct kate, it is a big site and "had" a lots of trees. This guy is also building his big office block adjacent to the new petrol station (his) across from JJB so may be he will get away with the slight miss calculation that took place in the setting out of the houses, been past the site, the houses are huge

park381 15-01-2011 16:02

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875224)
There are loads of enforcement notices every year for the committee to consider .. granted those who have overstepped the mark on their granted PP mostly.

Have you had a good look at the enforcement notices kate, how many are served on householders, where the council know they will win, its all down to what it will cost the council if they loose, its just the same with appeals, mind don't think HBC has a very good record, they have lost a few of late ;)

katex 15-01-2011 16:35

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 875583)
I do think BwD will be require full structural calcs, not be surprised if they don't make them take it down :D

Think you may be correct ... allow for objections, etc.. :D

Did notice was constructed of fibre glass .. surprised me ... there again not a builder so is probably quite normal.

park381 15-01-2011 18:46

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 875630)
Think you may be correct ... allow for objections, etc.. :D

Did notice was constructed of fibre glass .. surprised me ... there again not a builder so is probably quite normal.

I think most of these domes are constructed of fibre glass, but still a fairly large mass screwed/bolted to a built up felt flat roof probably with a decking of stramite board that is not designed to take that sort of load, think of the wind blowing against the dome, trying to rip it off its mountings......then again they may have used "wood screws" to fasten it down, designed to fly off in a strong wind to prevent damage to the roof of the "tank room" ;) please don't ask how I know it's the tank room roof :D

Rob249 19-01-2011 15:00

Re: Planning Applications
 
See HBC are dragging theyre feet updating applications.

park381 19-01-2011 15:38

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob249 (Post 876607)
See HBC are dragging theyre feet updating applications.

Aye their festive break must continue in to Feb, no planning committee meetings until early Feb either, kate what you going to do to fill your time in, no applications.
On a brighter planning front there must be changes afoot on the website, just been talking to a friend that does planning application drawings, still uses the old drawing board. He has been told by planning that they will require all his drawings on CD, he asked why..........its for the website.
Think about that kate soon (lol) we will be able to look at the drawings attached to planning applications...........what progress :mosher:

katex 19-01-2011 16:16

Re: Planning Applications
 
That'll keep us busy. Got a nod 12 months ago this was going to happen ... hope it does now.. :mosher:

park381 19-01-2011 16:30

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 876620)
That'll keep us busy. Got a nod 12 months ago this was going to happen ... hope it does now.. :mosher:

The information is recent like today, it will increase cost for the person wanting the drawings done, unless the drawings are done in Cad on the computer, then it's easy to pdf them. As you say it will be more interesting viewing the plans. BwD have had this facility on their site for a few years now. :cool:

jaysay 19-01-2011 17:50

Re: Planning Applications
 
You two are planning junkies:D:D:D

park381 19-01-2011 17:58

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay (Post 876656)
You two are planning junkies:D:D:D

No, just like to know what is going on, there may be a planning application that affects our residential amenities :rolleyes:

Rob249 20-01-2011 07:08

Re: Planning Applications
 
Its been updated, maybe they read my post yesterday lol.

park381 20-01-2011 07:21

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob249 (Post 876840)
Its been updated, maybe they read my post yesterday lol.

Thanks, will have a look :)

katex 01-02-2011 16:40

Re: Planning Applications
 
Just some that may prove of public interest:

11/10/0510 Full: Erection of extension to Coppice 19/01/2011
Spectator Stand to provide catering and toilet facilities (139m2)

The Crown Ground Livingstone Road
Accrington
Accrington Stanley FC

11/11/0015 28 day prior notification: Demolition of 62 - 84 Portland Street 61 - 79 07/01/2011
dwellings and 66 - 88 Steiner Street 64 -
72 Frederick Street Accrington
Hyndburn Borough Council

11/11/0012 Full: Erection of 5 No dwellings following 23/12/2010
demolition of shops and flats currently on site

6 Within Grove Accrington
BB5 6HX
Contour Housing Group

And, of course, this controversial one:

11/10/0541 Full Major: Demolition of existing care home 14/12/2010
building and erection of part two-storey and C
part three-storey building comprising of 36
extra care apartments (Resubmission). (The
proposal falls within a Conservation Area.)

Hill Top,Manchester Road.
Baxenden



I Care Extra Care Ltd

I wonder why they stopped doing this ... found it really helpful when you could just look down a list:

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...8.07.10_7_.pdf

park381 01-02-2011 17:01

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 879824)
Just some that may prove of public interest:

11/10/0510 Full: Erection of extension to Coppice 19/01/2011
Spectator Stand to provide catering and toilet facilities (139m2)

The Crown Ground Livingstone Road
Accrington
Accrington Stanley FC

11/11/0015 28 day prior notification: Demolition of 62 - 84 Portland Street 61 - 79 07/01/2011
dwellings and 66 - 88 Steiner Street 64 -
72 Frederick Street Accrington
Hyndburn Borough Council

11/11/0012 Full: Erection of 5 No dwellings following 23/12/2010
demolition of shops and flats currently on site

6 Within Grove Accrington
BB5 6HX
Contour Housing Group

And, of course, this controversial one:

11/10/0541 Full Major: Demolition of existing care home 14/12/2010
building and erection of part two-storey and C
part three-storey building comprising of 36
extra care apartments (Resubmission). (The
proposal falls within a Conservation Area.)

Hill Top,Manchester Road.
Baxenden



I Care Extra Care Ltd

I wonder why they stopped doing this ... found it really helpful when you could just look down a list:

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...8.07.10_7_.pdf

Have the Hill Top plans been ammended to include pitched roofs or are they as shown in Observer? :confused:

May be they have stopped the "search pages" because of the proposed alterations to the website :confused:

katex 01-02-2011 17:15

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 879832)
Have the Hill Top plans been ammended to include pitched roofs or are they as shown in Observer? :confused:

May be they have stopped the "search pages" because of the proposed alterations to the website :confused:

Don't know about the detailed plans of Hill Top, Park ... only what is shown on the site. Will be interesting to see what objections will turn up from local residents this time. Not on the agenda for tomorrow's planning meeting.

Main one there is the Lonsdale Street development (ex Spring Hill Club) .. makes heavy reading if you want to look.

Thought that about the search pages myself, but from July ???

lancsdave 01-02-2011 17:16

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 879824)
Just some that may prove of public interest:

11/10/0510 Full: Erection of extension to Coppice 19/01/2011
Spectator Stand to provide catering and toilet facilities (139m2)

The Crown Ground Livingstone Road
Accrington
Accrington Stanley FC

Ah, so that was why they couldn't complete it for the 31st Dec deadline. It was down to the weather, unable to get to the postbox to submit the planning application due to snow :D

park381 01-02-2011 18:20

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 879840)
Don't know about the detailed plans of Hill Top, Park ... only what is shown on the site. Will be interesting to see what objections will turn up from local residents this time. Not on the agenda for tomorrow's planning meeting.

Main one there is the Lonsdale Street development (ex Spring Hill Club) .. makes heavy reading if you want to look.

Thought that about the search pages myself, but from July ???

They have already started in Lonsdale street, got the floor slabs down, must have had the nod from an officer, it would be good if the planning committee voted "no" that would be a laugh :D

katex 01-02-2011 21:31

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 879869)
They have already started in Lonsdale street, got the floor slabs down, must have had the nod from an officer, it would be good if the planning committee voted "no" that would be a laugh :D

Yes, mentioned in the report for the meeting... LOL.

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...n_02-02-11.pdf

What I do not quite understand is this bit :

(i) That delegated authority is given to the Chief Planning and Transportation Officer or
Development Control Manager to approve planning permission subject to a legal
agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act relating to the
payment of £15,549 for open space improvements in Accrington and Oswaldtwistle

Tealeaf 01-02-2011 22:12

Re: Planning Applications
 
Thats called a bribe, in order for the development to proceed.

park381 02-02-2011 06:55

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 879979)
Yes, mentioned in the report for the meeting... LOL.

http://www.hyndburnbc.gov.uk/downloa...n_02-02-11.pdf

What I do not quite understand is this bit :

(i) That delegated authority is given to the Chief Planning and Transportation Officer or
Development Control Manager to approve planning permission subject to a legal
agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act relating to the
payment of £15,549 for open space improvements in Accrington and Oswaldtwistle

Think that the facility for delegated authority has always been in place, if there is no objection to the application the Chief Planning Officer can approve, more power to the officers, open to comments such as Tealeaf's post :eek:

Neil 02-02-2011 07:44

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf (Post 879992)
Thats called a bribe, in order for the development to proceed.

Sounds like a fair enough explanation.

This is another explanation Section 106

jaysay 02-02-2011 08:58

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil (Post 880018)
Sounds like a fair enough explanation.

This is another explanation Section 106

I know a fairy called nough, fairy-enough ;)

park381 02-02-2011 18:13

Re: Planning Applications
 
This has got to be good news
£2.6 million for housing in Hyndburn (From Lancashire Telegraph)

Bernard Dawson 02-02-2011 18:28

Re: Planning Applications
 
Good news, but the money is not just for Woodnook as the Telegraph article states. Peel Ward was also part of the scheme. And there's a determination in Peel Ward, with both Councillors and Residents determined to get a fair share of that money.

park381 02-02-2011 18:52

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 880164)
Good news, but the money is not just for Woodnook as the Telegraph article states. Peel Ward was also part of the scheme. And there's a determination in Peel Ward, with both Councillors and Residents determined to get a fair share of that money.

It is good news for Hyndburn not just Woodnook or Peel wards, it shows that there is money out there............to regenerate these bomb sites that are all round the borough.

Now this is practice from the dark ages
http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk...market/?ref=eb

Bernard Dawson 02-02-2011 19:19

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 880166)
It is good news for Hyndburn not just Woodnook or Peel wards, it shows that there is money out there............to regenerate these bomb sites that are all round the borough.

Now this is practice from the dark ages
Town chiefs appeal over Bacup supermarket (From Lancashire Telegraph)

There are areas all over the Borough. But some areas have done a lot better than others when it comes to getting resources in the past. Areas like Woodnook and Peel have waited patiently for it's share.

The original bid incidentally for East Accrington was for 9million. Whilst the 2 million is to be welcomed, it's well short of what's needed to address the problems we've got in this part of the town

park381 02-02-2011 19:57

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 880174)
There are areas all over the Borough. But some areas have done a lot better than others when it comes to getting resources in the past. Areas like Woodnook and Peel have waited patiently for it's share.
The original bid incidentally for East Accrington was for 9million. Whilst the 2 million is to be welcomed, it's well short of what's needed to address the problems we've got in this part of the town

I hope they do better at new build than the ones they are building on Blackburn road, the "new" houses are nearer to the road than the houses they knocked down, never seen anything like it, what were the planners thinking of. :mad:

Bernard Dawson 03-02-2011 09:31

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by park381 (Post 880176)
I hope they do better at new build than the ones they are building on Blackburn road, the "new" houses are nearer to the road than the houses they knocked down, never seen anything like it, what were the planners thinking of. :mad:

I keep asking the same question every time I'm driving past those houses on Blackburn Rd.

park381 03-02-2011 12:18

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson (Post 880229)
I keep asking the same question every time I'm driving past those houses on Blackburn Rd.

Get all the scaffolding away and the houses occupied, cars parked in front of the houses windows full of dust from the road, they will be just the same as the houses on the same side near the willows lane junction.....a mess, Blackburn road car park extended :D

katex 16-02-2011 16:56

Re: Planning Applications
 
Ah well, Jaysay, at least you won't have far to move (only joking, honest) :D

11/11/0023 Full Major: Erection of 22 bed private , 03/02/2011
hospital for the care and treatment of people with mental disorders, specialising in the treatment of dementia

Land at James Street
Oswaldtwistle
Accrington BB5 3LJ

Mr Afzal Hussain

park381 16-02-2011 17:18

Re: Planning Applications
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by katex (Post 884083)
Ah well, Jaysay, at least you won't have far to move (only joking, honest) :D

11/11/0023 Full Major: Erection of 22 bed private , 03/02/2011
hospital for the care and treatment of people with mental disorders, specialising in the treatment of dementia

Land at James Street
Oswaldtwistle
Accrington BB5 3LJ

Mr Afzal Hussain

One never knows you may be right :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 16:22.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com