![]() |
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
We may have also 'kept silent' if we had been offered a convenient accident or arranged suicide as an alternative
Don't scoff at that - you know it happens. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
Quote:
1. Ben talked about cabinet minister Ken Clarke groping his penis in political lobbyist Ian Greer’s office. 2. Ben talked about a top female BBC producer who likes to have sex with teenagers. 3. Ben listed the well known actors, casting directors, producers, directors, writers and executives who had abused him sexually, or attempted to abuse him sexually, while he was a child actor . |
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
"The 'Bin Laden of pedophiles"
Avrohom Mondrowitz, New York’s most notorious child molester - living scot-free in Israel. poorrichard's blog: Brooklyn child-molest monster 'got away with it' after fleeing to Israel |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Saw the Panorama documentary the other night - the scene of the "Clunk Click" program with him and Gary Glitter with there arms around those 16 (15) year old girls and Savile said to Glitter, "Get in there get between 'em!" Sordid... Gary Glitter was even in the Spicegirls Movie but his scene was deleted... Spiceworld: Gary Glitter (deleted scene) - YouTube |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
BBC News - MP raises claim of past paedophile ring linked to No 10 |
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
Interesting that the victims of Jimmy Saville are going to sue for millions
Jimmy Savile: BBC faces allegations over 'censored' emails, 12 victims abused by DJ head for court | Mail Online Yet the Hilsbrough families have to release a charity record to raise money BBC News - Musicians record track for Hillsborough families Justice.....:( |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
I bet spice girls are disgusted with themselves for singing that song. How he was allowed to be potrayed as a musician in the first place(back then) is disgusting enough to me. that song is an insult to any musician.
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
So a number of 1960s 'celebrities' are so worried they will become embroiled in the Jimmy Savile scandal, they have employed the services of the publicist Max Clifford.
:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused: :confused: What in goodness name is a PUBLICIST going to achieve for them? If they DIDN'T abuse children, they have nothing to worry about. If they DID abuse them, they deserve all they get. They'd be better off getting a good lawyer rather than a grubby publicist. And the excuse about being caught up in the 'hedonistic atmosphere of the times' doesn't remotely hold water. Child abuse was as much a crime then as it is now. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
.....and furthermore, if any of them HAS admitted to this Clifford character that they DID abuse children, he had better report it straight to the police or he will be laying himself open to charges of perverting the course of justice.
As far as i know, 'publicists' have no legal standing in withholding information from the police for reasons of client confidentiality. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Whilst it aint much of a shock Pervert Glitter has been arrested, it makes me wonder if this is n easy option fer em? Rather n arrest someone higher up the peado chain?
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
The main obstacle to exposure of pedophile networks is participation by police, politicians, and judges in the very practices that we are asking them to expose.
At the moment the disposable small fry are being hung out to dry. Deeper levels of the corruption will only get exposed if the 'free press' have the gumption to expose it. We can but hope that in the scramble to avoid exposure, the participants will reveal each other. It will be Murdoch's revenge.:D |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
I think it is coming Margaret. The day when the squealers come out of the woodwork.
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Because of the current furore about what went on all those years ago, it is now easier to bring up these episodes...and they know that more note will be taken of what is being said....it maybe that the squealers go to the press first.......many of the squealers have fulfilled their ambitions, and are only looking to cover their backs by exposing someone else.
My main concern is that those who are in high places in the judiciary/politics/police(and there will be some) may have had enough warning to destroy the evidence. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
Former Minister says Thatcher aide was paedophile who preyed on boys' home - and Hague should have known
Read more: Former Minister says Thatcher aide was paedophile who preyed on boys' home - and Hague should have known | Mail Online |
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
Glitter arrested, now who’s next? Officers in Savile probe prepare to swoop on more celebrities
Glitter arrested, now who¿s next? Officers in Savile probe prepare to swoop on more celebrities | Mail Online |
Re: Sir Jimmy Saville
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
There has been 2 threads running on this subject together
i and the other mods are fed up having to mod both threads as repeat posts are going in both threads so i have merged them into one thread. Now please stay on topic |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Good idea before I ever decided to start a new post I have a good look around to check if their are any I coud post to instead of starting a new one! That saves starting threads on the same topic.
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
The story was first broken by Miles Goslett in The Oldie magazine in February and picked up in the blogsphere by Guido Fawkes and the BCC only, reluctantly, got involved after ITV broke the story on television in early October.
Isn't it it strange that if it wasn't for ITV broadcasting the 'Exposure' programme all of this would still be unknown, despite a couple of little known on-liners bringing up the story back in February. These sites, it would seem, journalists follow closely. We have effectively had 7 months worth of media blackout on the activities of JavaScript et al! The proverbial hot potato that wasn't going to be touched by anyone in the media world, home or abroad. What a story for any journalist to break open, 'Savilegate' if you like, but with no editor of any media form, prepared to touch it. If it wasn't for ITV, JavaScript's activities would still remain unpublicised. I'll not be surprised if there are folders and folders of evidence and testimony in fleet street offices either locked away or now in shreds. Editors and journalists now getting rid of the evidence that they, the papers, knew the full story but weren't prepared to expose JavaScript. I guess that the information they may have had could have been gained as part of the hacking scandal, the one that closed down the NotW. Now who would want to expose that sort of activity, thereby risking their future! I feel that there's a lot more to come out of this whole deep episode |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
With all the recent revelations:
1.Are rapist's,pedo's running our country? 2.Are rapist's,pedo's running our church,boy scouts,hospitals,schools? 3.Are rapist's,pedo's running any institution which they would be able to perpetrate, rape upon defenceless and vulnerable kids? 4.Are rapist's,pedo's watching each others backs working their way into postions of power and influance so that rapist's,pedo's are not invesagated,evidence lost,crimes covered up?........... Sorry what i meant to say is: With all the recent revelations: 1.rapist's,pedo's are running our country 2.rapist's,pedo's are running our church,boy scouts,hospitals,schools 3.rapist's,pedo's are running any institution which they would be able to perpetrate, rape upon defenceless and vulnerable kids 4.rapist's,pedo's are watching each others backs working their way into postions of power and influance so that rapist's,pedo's are not invesagated,evidence lost,crimes covered up :rolleyes: I don't want to go through the evidence case by case (jimmy sav,catholic,preists,ted heath,ken clarke) |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Why do you need to point out what others, may have done? Is it something you've been tempted towards? Do you feel so relieved, that given temptation, you have resisted it therefore you can claim to be innocent? Well allow me to tell you, temptation has always been there, for every single bloke, but we don't need to bluster the way you do. Are you feeling guilty? :mad: |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
I am more concerned this took so long to come out, I am finding it very hard to believe he could keep this secret for so long. And why did the press and all though who knew said nothing for so long. Still I am sure you and Kestralex are loving this:rolleyes: I will say no more on this distasteful subject. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
http://ceop.police.uk/Media-Centre/P...ery-3-minutes/ |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
By the way is your avatar you sitting on a motorbike (or is it a torchi in your hand?) in a cowboy hat? If not can you explain it! :D |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
If i'm not mistaken its from Dr Strangelove 9 or how i learned to love the atom bomb) or something similar. Slim pickens riding a nuke down on to those peskt reds. :):):)
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
I'm not here to stir trouble,The only thing i'm guilty of is sharing a few views on Accyweb but i don't think thats criminal ;) |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
1 Attachment(s)
Seems like even the Archbishop of Canterbury wasn't safe :eek: ;)
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Alan is correct, the picture is of Slim Pickins, sitting astride a nuclear bomb in the bomb bay of a B52 Bomber, the film is indeed Dr Strangelove, or how I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Good find. :rolleyes:The more I see Savile now the more I think what a total ****! :( |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
I thought it was you coming into land on a daily basis, in your work! I know the film and the scene but that shot doesn't jog the memory.:) |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
So BBC Children in Need have announced that later years of operations did not use Savile, because they had become aware of the decades of pedo rumours.
This may well pacify you enough to consider making a donation this year, but consider that this 'charity', supposedly having the interests of children as its reason for being, chose to take no action on the allegations they were aware of. Children in Need has recently appointed Max Clifford as its Google Page Ranking representative, so you are about to have your perceptions manipulated. Max Clifford has been approached and employed by numerous 'celebrities' recently, who wish to avoid their names being implicated in Savile's criminal activity. This indicates that he has heard some 'confessions'. Please consider whether or not he should advise the police of what he has been told, or whether he should be allowed to profit from non disclosure. This video shows that Alan Clarke 'interfered with girls from the age of 14' Tory minister sex with 14 year olds: Clifford 'I've all the hidden evidence' on celebrities - YouTube |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Simon Cowell has his secrets covered up by Max Clifford by paying £250,000 a year for the last 7 years + bonuses
Max Clifford admits to covering for pervert clients. - YouTube |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
1 Attachment(s)
Here's a good overview asserting its the United Grand Lodge at the top ... keeping all the satanic pedo mess under wraps for decades ... and desperately trying to keep a lid on it all
JIMMY SAVILE: BRITISH ESTABLISHMENT EXPOSED LIKE NEVER BEFORE An article on his highlands property where numourus people could have been abused News | Mail Online ... abuse.html Some folk might be more upset than others that they were blind to his ways :eek: |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Max Clittord has a new client - newsnight tonight was to have named a politician (live one) but have been silenced by lawyers. learned from Twitters
It is time the attention was diverted away from celebrity gropers to the hardcore abusers (pun intended). |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Incredible,The number of people who knew about him whilst he was alive was truly vast. Yet, for whatever reason, they never reported him or if they did, no action was taken.
I wonder if So-VILE had links to the company that the Krays ran whilst they were in prison. Krayleigh Enterprises This is a good article on Krayleigh ... a protection racket run from prison that protected people like Sinatra. The Krays boasted "we have never lost a client yet". Ronnie Kray was described and known in the prison and Broadmoor to be a predatory homosexual ... Could that be a form of bond between he and SoVILE?? The connections are really interesting. Abel Danger Links Ken Clarke to Krayleigh Bodyguards and Obama Ambassador Rape - YouTube At 5.35 evidence from Blue Mountain (a massive private security firm) that Kenneth Clarke was invited to Bilderberg this year to show his allegiance to the cabal of the elite trying to create the NWO. Invitees feel privileged to be invited by such a powerful group ... but they learn their allegiance is obtained and maintained by blackmail. In the case of Clarke if was his cover up of major paedophile activities at Broadmoor involving SoVILE and the Krays. The bingo moment. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
And the witch hunt continues....
Suicide BBC reporter said ex-Radio 1 DJ Liz Kershaw threatened him in aggressive phone calls | Mail Online What's next..'I saw John Noakes groping Shep's pups through the round window' alleges former playschool icon Big Ted? |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
It was due to past generations of British armed forces who gave so much that allows you to spout your bile here today ! And the Military of today are following in that tradition of selflessness still, thereby allowing ingrates such as you to glibly cast aspersions on their integrity. I suggest you shut up or put up ! |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
2. I'm not interested in your suggestions |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So, from that we're to assume you can't substantiate your outlandish claim. That being the case, how much more of your other contributions are in the same vein ? |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Here's 1 link (2 seconds with the help of a google search) | The Sun |News |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Well I for one find your outpourings juvenile, tasteless, and of as much use as a wet fart. Do us all a favour, put your computer back in the box it came in and send it back to the manufacturers, it is far to complex for a child like you. :( |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Right, now you've put something up I can go with your comment, although I still find it distasteful in the extreme. But & this is the main thing it was other members of their unit that brought about their apprehension & exposure to justice. (highlighting my point of integrity)
Furthermore the article states .- They were held following complaints from other servicemen. Allegations Several laptops have been seized and their contents scoured by a team of military cops assigned to the inquiry. It is the first time allegations of abusing children have been levelled against British troops in either Afghanistan or Iraq. So the inference of "serious darkness" a little overboard I'd say & not to be compared to that vile creature Savile & his network. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
As for the masonic ritual of burying at an angle of 45 degrees and the last link you posted to this...it would be necessary, (would it not) to allow the people to see themselves(easily) in the mirror to have the bogus coffin placed at an angle of 45 degrees........this doesn not necessarily mean that it is a masonic ritual. I did try to find further evidence of this, as being common practice in masonry. I failed. I got fed up of reading guff and gubbins...and I'm afraid I ran out of steam before I came up with anything positive...well, the spuds needed peeling for the tea. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Do you find that hard to believe? |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Don't try to drag the decent majority of these lads, down to a level that satisfies your rather disconcerting interest in this unsavoury behaviour highlighted by complaints about Savile. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
If someone sends a email with footage of a child being abused i can only assume they assume the person their sending it to will get some sort of satifaction from said email. if the footage is of child being abused that makes that person complicit,unless they reported it. As to folk filming themselfs doing something 'funny' and hosting it on youtube,I hardly think it's in the same league as filming child abuse and sending it to a colleague :rolleyes: As i've said I have the upmost respect for some former/ present members of the British armed forces.i'm not trying to drag any of them down to jimbo's level as that would be impossible. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
To the members that have had enough of this idiots posts, use the report button frequently, I know the mod's are just as fed up with this clown as everyone else. :D |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
As much as you a few others(accyweb elite) maybe fed up with my posts I don't think that constitutes a banning or does it? To all the members that enjoy my posts feel to use the report button to report a online witch hunt ;) |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/i...lies/rofl3.gif |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
A bit of trolling to liven things up is OK but he's giving trolling a bad name! |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Mine was kind of an ambiguous post but I have you down as the "Grand Wizard" |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Crea...oing_magic.gif |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
After all the revelations about his past and all the accusations about him being a paedophile and sexual pervert and preditor,what is the general consensus on here,should he have his knighthood and papal knighthood and his OBE taken off him,as was the case with the queens picture advisor Sir Anthony Blunt QC when it was found out that he was a russian spy,I know that these allegations as yet are alleged and as yet not proven in a court of law,and with him being deceased would not really make a lot of diffenence to him personally,but should they be cancelled after all these things are now coming to light.
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Wouldn't think yeh would give a monkeys alan :D
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
a witty repost from you cashy,of course i would expect that sort of thing from some of the lowlife on here,but as it is my right to free speech i speak as i find it and it was an informative question about the circumstances that these allegatioins where founded on and if the members on here think that he should lose his titles,of course it being over 7 years ago since i made a stupid mistake and have paid for it please stop posting cheap inudoes and snide remarks aimed at my past,it is in the past and i for one have moved on,if this is the depth of your intelligence and morality then my go help you.i come on here to take part in and ask constructive questions and expect to be treated the same way i treat other members on here WITH RESPECT, SO GET OVER IT I HAVE
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
That's pretty funny. But. Does a few old men meeting for a beer or two on a Saturday afternoon count as a secret society? :p :do-one: |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
all the staff work hard on here and need a break once a week:thepint::thepint::thepint::thepint: |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
I don't go in case they have their trouser legs rolled up. There are some sights that an old biddy like me can't cope with. :D
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
I don't think Chris should have been barred.
Considering the reactions I got when I first started this thread - at the time it was a shot in the dark, but since starting it I have apparently been vindicated. :do-one: |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
You must not question the Forum Staff’s actions within the forums but communicate via Private Message or E-mail. The Forum Staff have the final say in all actions that they have taken. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
I don't consider you to be vindicated, if as you say, 'a shot in the dark', that I take to mean a guess, do we really need 'shots in the dark', or do we need sane factual posts? Please don't come back with the old freedom of speech dribble, there is no such thing, when we signed up as members we signed up to the rules, (yes even those of us that didn't read them), so if a mod/admin say's you're out, you're out. They need to give us no reason whatsoever. Tow a reasonable line don't ruin the site for others and you stay, otherwise suffer withdrawal. Oh the pain of my last ban wishing I could reply to your inane diatribe, (whatever it was), and having no keyboard to do it, luckily my ban was only temporary. :) |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
I would've agreed with kestrelx about the banning if Chris hadn't broken so many basic fundamental (universal) forum rules
Also being previously banned and not taking advice on how to stay a member of the forum the second time. It seemed to me that admin gave him a chance and he blew it. You can't ban members just because a bunch of other members don't like their views and quickyness. One thing I noticed is that Chris must have received quite a bit of positive karma. That goes to show that some people didn't mind him. Though I agree flooding the forum with the conspiracy nonsense is a no-go. I suppose that if he was to have not been banned, a thread in anything goes titled "Conspiracy" or something like that could've been purposed. Then most people wouldn't have to read the stuff. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
its simple to me, if it was him that posted obscene insulting comment in a anon karma message?, then it was a no-brainer.
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Agreed cashman
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2 |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Why what happened to your keyboard? :) |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
Thing is today it is on the front page of Mirror that Savile was quizzed about the ripper murders after a tip off. |
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
|
Re: Allegations about Jimmy Saville: covered up?
Quote:
but some retired copper wants to top up his pension and sensationalise an anonymous tip off from a member of the public, i bet Lord Lucan, Elvis, Glen Miller and a few others were also "reported", what a load of tripe!!!!! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com