Omg ott! DNA for dogs

[davemac]

Originally Posted by kestrelx

That's right - these dog owners think they are beyond the law! This will take the smile of their faces they should have their noses rubbed in their dogs crap and then some!

don't you mean take the smile of their faeces

sorry for the late response,been busy (bizzy get it) no, never mind

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by davemac

don't you mean take the smile of their faeces

sorry for the late response,been busy (bizzy get it) no, never mind

Thought bizzy was a cop in Liverpool Dave

[DaveinGermany]

Is this another first for Hyndburn Council ? Even the National press have picked it up. And poor old Kenny boy is being named as the instigator.

Dog mess could be subjected to DNA testing under plans being considered by a council - Telegraph

[DaveinGermany]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Thought bizzy was a cop in Liverpool Dave

Scuffers Jay.

[MargaretR]

This is a second incident of misreporting/overinflating facts by the Observer.

Could a strongly worded solicitors letter deter them from doing it yet again?

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Scuffers Jay.

They must be two of the better names used for the police in Liverpool

[garinda]

Originally Posted by MargaretR

This is a second incident of misreporting/overinflating facts by the Observer.

Could a strongly worded solicitors letter deter them from doing it yet again?

The Observer 'story' only said what Ken's basically posted on here.

It's a non-story, but no laws have been broken.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by garinda

The Observer 'story' only said what Ken's basically posted on here.

It's a non-story, but no laws have been broken.

Only the laws of decent journalism Rindi

[garinda]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Only the laws of decent journalism Rindi

If you're operating on a shoestring this is what you get.

The days of the traditional local printed press are probably numbered.

Sadly.

How many people on here no longer get the Observer each weekend, but glance at their website, for free?

[DaveinGermany]

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Is this another first for Hyndburn Council ? Even the National press have picked it up. And poor old Kenny boy is being named as the instigator.

Dog mess could be subjected to DNA testing under plans being considered by a council - Telegraph

Don't know if you've realised or not but this story is from the pages of the "Daily Telegraph" and not the "Lancashire Telegraph".

[susie123]

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Don't know if you've realised or not but this story is from the pages of the "Daily Telegraph" and not the "Lancashire Telegraph".

That story may be crap (ha ha) but it has the cutest mutt!

[MargaretR]

It looks as though Ken is being targeted by this misreporting.

I wonder which member of the opposition he most upset, and is malicious enough to encourage the Observer to publish such stuff

[garinda]

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Is this another first for Hyndburn Council ? Even the National press have picked it up. And poor old Kenny boy is being named as the instigator.

Dog mess could be subjected to DNA testing under plans being considered by a council - Telegraph

Just as the story of the night-vision goggled dog wardens was picked up by the big boys.

Well we are Hyndburn International.

Even if all the stories that are now associated with Hyndburn are literally excrement.

In the Second World War everyone knew that 'Careless Talk Cost Lives'.

Perhaps the blabber mouths at H.B.C. should remember this, when feeding their tit-bits to the press.

Forget Floral Market Town.

Hyndburn - Where Crap Talks.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by MargaretR

It looks as though Ken is being targeted by this misreporting.

I wonder which member of the opposition he most upset, and is malicious enough to encourage the Observer to publish such stuff

I doubt the opposition knows what Cllr. Moss tells the press.

If you attempt to use the press for your own gain, there's very often a price to pay.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by MargaretR

It looks as though Ken is being targeted by this misreporting.

I wonder which member of the opposition he most upset, and is malicious enough to encourage the Observer to publish such stuff

Probably because the 'off-the-cuff' remark came from his lips.