Accrington Web
   

Home Gallery Arcade Blogs Members List Today's Posts
Go Back   Accrington Web > AccyWeb > General Chat
Donate! Join Today

General Chat General chat - common sense in here please. Decent serious discussions to be enjoyed by everyone!


Welcome to Accrington Web!

We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!



Like Tree8Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2009, 10:25   #76
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

You are too young to remember the Windscale fire of 1957.
Some of us oldies do not want history repeated - we are NIMBYs for good reason
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Accrington Web
Old 02-08-2009, 10:31   #77
God Member
 
andrewb's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR View Post
You are too young to remember the Windscale fire of 1957.
Some 50 years later I think we could at least reassess the situation on nuclear safety.
__________________
formerly cyfr
andrewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 10:37   #78
Resting in Peace
 
jaysay's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewb View Post
Some 50 years later I think we could at least reassess the situation on nuclear safety.
I tend to agree Andrew, after all we have actualy walked on the moon since then
__________________
35 YEARS AND COUNTING
jaysay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 10:45   #79
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

The french have had nuclear accidents too
TWO ACCIDENTS RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT FRANCE'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM - The New York Times

At the time of the fire, and for many years after, my parents had a weekend caravan on the coast at Crag Bank on Morecambe Bay.
They spent every weekend there. My father loved to walk out on the mudflats for most of those weekend days in summer.
Radioactive hotspots in the Wyre estuary have been reported less than 10 years ago.

My father died from multiple myeloma (white blood cell cancer)
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 10:46   #80
Senior Member+
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

The debate on wind farms on Ossy Moors is back on again of course. New Planning Application going in I'm led to believe.
Bernard Dawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 10:57   #81
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

I have read the this revised application will be for fewer turbines, and on Oswaldtwistle side of the boundary only.
National heritage intervened because of the prehistoric stone circle site.
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:08   #82
Senior Member+
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR View Post
I have read the this revised application will be for fewer turbines, and on Oswaldtwistle side of the boundary only.
National heritage intervened because of the prehistoric stone circle site.
That's my understanding also Margaret. The consultation rounds are going on at the moment.
Bernard Dawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:12   #83
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

So Hyndburn Council won't have to share(with Rossendale) the big chunk of money provided by the energy generation company as 'compensation'
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:19   #84
JFT96

 
Boeing Guy's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Not forgetting, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl. I never suggested that I was a strong proponent of Nuclear Energy, I am not, (what reasonable choice do we have?). But the stupidity of wind farms, .... well why don't we start a theory on that then.
__________________
"your mind will find a way to be unkind to you somehow. But all we really have is happening to us right now. Happiness is the road"

Steve Hogarth, lead singer Marillion
Boeing Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:40   #85
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR View Post
I have read the this revised application will be for fewer turbines, and on Oswaldtwistle side of the boundary only.
National heritage intervened because of the prehistoric stone circle site.
Reduced from 24 turbines to 12, they have a website to keep people in touch:

Hyndburn Wind Farm - Welcome to the Hyndburn Wind Farm website
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:44   #86
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

There is a theory that nicholas Tesla, who invented the system of alternating current, later devised way to produce free energy.
His experiment results were impounded by the US government who had a vested interest in oil production.
Chapter 7 of this link outlines the method he is credited with inventing.

Lost Journals of Nicholas Tesla - Tesla and Science-Research

but of course this is just a 'conspiracy'
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:46   #87
Senior Member+
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR View Post
So Hyndburn Council won't have to share(with Rossendale) the big chunk of money provided by the energy generation company as 'compensation'
They say that the new Planning Application addresses some of the concerns that were brought up around the original application

I haven't heard the one about compensation before.Although from the company's point of view, its probably easier to deal with one planning authority

I suppose there may also be talk of a section 106 agreement being attached to the application, which is a form of compensation.I'm not sure
Bernard Dawson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:52   #88
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bernard Dawson View Post
They say that the new Planning Application addresses some of the concerns that were brought up around the original application

I haven't heard the one about compensation before.Although from the company's point of view, its probably easier to deal with one planning authority

I suppose there may also be talk of a section 106 agreement being attached to the application, which is a form of compensation.I'm not sure
I do recall 'compensation' being mentioned in old press reports.
I have found reference to such 'compen' being paid in Scotland here-
BBC NEWS | UK | Scotland | Village fights for wind farm cash

ScottishPower, which is behind the plan, is expected to make regular payments for the benefit of the local community, totalling about £100,000 per year.
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 11:58   #89
Resting in Peace

 
katex's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MargaretR View Post
I do recall 'compensation' being mentioned in old press reports.
I have found reference to such 'compen' being paid in Scotland here-
BBC NEWS | UK | Scotland | Village fights for wind farm cash

ScottishPower, which is behind the plan, is expected to make regular payments for the benefit of the local community, totalling about £100,000 per year.
They are offering £100,000 to the Environmental Fund.
katex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2009, 12:01   #90
God Member
 
MargaretR's Avatar
 

Re: Windfarm anyone?

LEF Website
...so PB won't get a say in how it is spent?.....I can't see that happening
__________________



MargaretR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Other sites of interest.. More town sites..




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01.


© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1