The Tories - Page 166

Less · 18-02-2013, 10:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

I tried that With C'mon but it didn't make any difference, if you have a problem with spelling try and do something about it, at least I do try to make readable the stuff I write on here Less

Yes I know only teasing, I've watched you struggle and mess up your posts for what seems like 13 years now but I'll give you 9/10 for trying.

Gordon Booth · 18-02-2013, 10:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Yes I know only teasing, I've watched you struggle and mess up your posts for what seems like 13 years now but I'll give you 9/10 for trying.

That was due to 13 years of Labour mismanagement, Less.
You'll notice he's improved since the Torys got in!

jaysay · 18-02-2013, 10:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Yes I know only teasing, I've watched you struggle and mess up your posts for what seems like 13 years now but I'll give you 9/10 for trying.

Its actually only 8 Less but doesn't time fly when your enjoying yourself, sometimes

it just seems like 13, now that is a long time, a lot of irreparable damage can be done in that time

jaysay · 18-02-2013, 10:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth

That was due to 13 years of Labour mismanagement, Less.
You'll notice he's improved since the Torys got in!

Your a very shroud man Gordon

Gordon Booth · 18-02-2013, 10:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

Your a very shroud man Gordon

Hang on, jaysay, I'm not dead yet!

Eric · 18-02-2013, 10:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

Your a very shroud man Gordon

A true classic .... you get better with age

jaysay · 18-02-2013, 17:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth

Hang on, jaysay, I'm not dead yet!

Your very shrewd Gordon

cmonstanley · 20-02-2013, 18:35

ha ha listen to this he is off his rocker Audioboo / Iain Duncan-Smith's Explosive Row With James O'Brien

cmonstanley · 20-02-2013, 18:43

ian duncan smith failed politician. so how much mr smith ha ha

jaysay · 20-02-2013, 18:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

ian duncan smith failed politician. so how much mr smith ha ha

No mention of the jobless falling again C'mon or the fact that more people are in work in this country than ever before, If you think IDS is a failed politician, better not look at the a to z of Labour MPs they total 95% of failed politicians

cmonstanley · 20-02-2013, 19:05

jobless falling again ha ha .if somebodies working 3 hours a week they are saying they are in work and take away the workfare people and actually its up with the harsher sanction schemes .you havent got a clue.the figures dont add up.there goes axminster .

Eric · 20-02-2013, 19:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

jobless falling again ha ha .if somebodies working 3 hours a week they are saying they are in work and take away the workfare people and actually its up with the harsher sanction schemes .you havent got a clue.the figures dont add up.there goes axminster .

Actually, both you and your archenemy are out to lunch on this one. C'mon, you failed to notice the increase in full time work, along with a fall in part time. And Jaysay, whose knowledge of economics appears to rank right up there with his spelling and his fixation on the number "13", sees cause for optimism with an economy which is using an increasing number of bodies, working for less, in real terms, to generate a zero increase in output. The only thing you got right is that "the figures don't add up." And that is cause for concern.

cmonstanley · 20-02-2013, 19:32

they are classing workfare as full time hours. so im not wrong.if tje unemployment figures are so good how come out put is falling it dont add up]• The government claims unemployment is falling, despite minimal economic growth. In fact, the government's fiddling the unemployment figures, as usual, but by a new method: counting people on "workfare" as employed – as confirmed by Department of Work and Pensions and Office for National Statistics replies to freedom of information requests published on the Informed Consent blog. Workfare makes unemployed people work unpaid for private firms, including Conservative party donors, or else lose their benefits. The government's own research shows that it doesn't improve chances of finding paid work.

ONS figures and Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development research show half the people counted as newly employed are on workfare, government training schemes, or are self-employed, mostly in part-time, low-paid jobs like gardening and cleaning, in which they may be worse off as they lose benefits. Unemployment was at 2.51m when this government came to power in May 2010. It's now at 2.53m, even on their fiddled figures.

jaysay · 21-02-2013, 09:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

they are classing workfare as full time hours. so i'm not wrong.if the unemployment figures are so good how come out put is falling it don't add up]• The government claims unemployment is falling, despite minimal economic growth. In fact, the government's fiddling the unemployment figures, as usual, but by a new method: counting people on "workfare" as employed – as confirmed by Department of Work and Pensions and Office for National Statistics replies to freedom of information requests published on the Informed Consent blog. Workfare makes unemployed people work unpaid for private firms, including Conservative party donors, or else lose their benefits. The government's own research shows that it doesn't improve chances of finding paid work.

ONS figures and Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development research show half the people counted as newly employed are on workfare, government training schemes, or are self-employed, mostly in part-time, low-paid jobs like gardening and cleaning, in which they may be worse off as they lose benefits. Unemployment was at 2.51m when this government came to power in May 2010. It's now at 2.53m, even on their fiddled figures.

Well there's one think for sure your not interested in this country showing any sore of recovery all you are interested is trying to impress people with your skills at cutting and pasting now you've realized that nobody takes notice of the futile Guardian links you've kept posting, how can we tell its cut and pasted, there's no spelling mistakes and there's words which begin with capitals

Guinness · 21-02-2013, 16:04

So apparently the Tories screwed up again today with their candidate declining to take part in BBC debate. She's been pretty outspoken with some cracking 'foot in the gob' type stuff. So it's alleged that she has been deliberately hid away from any more media gaffes

Eastleigh by-election: Tories 'trying to hide candidate' Maria Hutchings - Telegraph

Anyhoo...our Dave gets a bit annoyed about this and says....

“I think the BBC has behaved badly and stupidly over this from everything I’ve heard about it. My understanding is that we were discussing with you for ages beforehand about the timing of the hustings and the fact that Maria wanted to be with me for this meeting. This is a totally got up thing by the BBC. You know you’re not the most important thing in this by-election – the candidates are.”

So there you have it folks.....straight from the mouth of the leader of the Tory party...the most important thing in this by-election are THE CANDIDATES????

Wonder how low in importance are us plebs to the tories?...you know the VOTING PUBLIC, the mugs that pay their wages!!!